Daily Archives: January 13, 2022

IA: Conflict of laws: Federal SW that ends up in state prosecution governed by federal law, not state

When a federal search warrant results in a state prosecution, federal law applies to the search in state court. Here it applied to a scope of search question that might have been decided differently under state law. This court held … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IA: Conflict of laws: Federal SW that ends up in state prosecution governed by federal law, not state

S.D.Tex.: BOLO that matched defendant’s car was RS for stop

A BOLO that matched defendant’s car was reasonable suspicion for a stop. United States v. Yanez, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6376 (S.D.Tex. Jan. 12, 2022). Cell phone communication and text messages about drug deals with the defendant gave probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: BOLO that matched defendant’s car was RS for stop

CA7: Perfunctory 4A claim was treated as Heck barred

Plaintiff’s perfunctory Fourth Amendment claim is Heck barred because he seeks to undermine his conviction. If it were more specific, maybe it would have overcome Heck, but this doesn’t. Raney v. Wisconsin, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 966 (7th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA7: Perfunctory 4A claim was treated as Heck barred

CA10: That officer could have provided false affidavit is not a ‘substantial preliminary showing’ for Franks

“Velarde-Pavia has offered no evidence that Officer Juarez lied in his affidavit. Rather than make the needed ‘substantial preliminary showing,’ Velarde-Pavia only speculates that Officer Juarez could be lying–that is not enough.” As to informant hearsay, the affidavit for the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: That officer could have provided false affidavit is not a ‘substantial preliminary showing’ for Franks

S.D.Ind.: SoL for false arrest starts on release from custody

The statute of limitations for a false arrest case starts with release. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill. (Manuel II), 903 F.3d 667, 669 (7th Cir. 2018), on remand from Manuel v. City of Joliet, Ill., 137 S. Ct. 911 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: SoL for false arrest starts on release from custody