CA7: Perfunctory 4A claim was treated as Heck barred

Plaintiff’s perfunctory Fourth Amendment claim is Heck barred because he seeks to undermine his conviction. If it were more specific, maybe it would have overcome Heck, but this doesn’t. Raney v. Wisconsin, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 966 (7th Cir. Jan. 12, 2022).

“Here, Movant offers no reason to conclude he did not have a full and fair opportunity to challenge the warrant at trial. … ‘The relevant inquiry is whether petitioner had the opportunity to litigate his claim, not whether he did in fact do so or even whether the claim was correctly decided.’ Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 899 (9th Cir. 1996).” The argument that defense counsel somehow had a conflict of interest on the search question is rejected for being conclusory. McReynolds v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6005 (D.Ariz. Jan. 12, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.