Daily Archives: February 6, 2021

ME: 18 yo son could consent to police entry

Defendant’s 18 year old son living in the home was reasonably believed to have authority to consent to an entry. Then the officers went to find defendant. State v. Glenn, 2021 ME 7 (Jan. 28, 2021). In the direct appeal, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on ME: 18 yo son could consent to police entry

AR: Reasonableness of a probation search has to be presented to revocation court first

Defendant didn’t argue in the revocation court that the probation search was unreasonable, so it can’t be argued on appeal. Mathis v. State, 2021 Ark. App. 49, 2021 Ark. App. LEXIS 57 (Feb. 3, 2021). Defendant was on release and … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Standards of review | Comments Off on AR: Reasonableness of a probation search has to be presented to revocation court first

CA7: Computer search condition was not related to crime of conviction and was thus unreasonable

Defendant’s computer search release condition had no rational relationship to the crime. He was not a sex offender and there was no computer link to his crimes. United States v. Morgan, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 2972 (7th Cir. Feb. 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Overseizure, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA7: Computer search condition was not related to crime of conviction and was thus unreasonable

CA11: When “[n]o force was justified, … any force was excessive.”

“We agree with the district court that Officer Kahl’s use of force was unreasonable. Although Officer Kahl’s actions did not result in severe physical harm, they were not proportional to the situation. The severity of injury may be evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: When “[n]o force was justified, … any force was excessive.”

CA2: The officer’s perceptions were reasonable that entry into defendant’s backyard was necessary

“Nor can we say that Galligan’s enforcement action was clearly unlawful. The undisputed facts of this case demonstrate that Plaintiffs kept a variety of unusual objects in their backyard, causing it to resemble a junkyard. The question is not whether … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA2: The officer’s perceptions were reasonable that entry into defendant’s backyard was necessary