Daily Archives: February 21, 2021

CT: Police knowledge def’s cell phone was used to communicate with co-conspirators and victim was justification for seizure then SW

There were exigent circumstances for seizure of defendant’s cell phone incident to his arrest and probable cause for a search warrant to search it. The police developed information that the conspirators communicated with the victim by phone before the crime. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CT: Police knowledge def’s cell phone was used to communicate with co-conspirators and victim was justification for seizure then SW

N.D.Cal.: Potential for risk of violence justified nighttime search

Defendant’s motion to suppress on several grounds is denied. The affidavit showed probable cause, and the good faith exception would apply anyway. The affidavit for a firearm wasn’t stale; the information about weapons was still “fresh” even though a shooting … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Potential for risk of violence justified nighttime search

N.-M.: Military def counsel ineffective for not making a suppression motion that would have been granted

Military defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the command authorized inspection of his off-base private housing. The exigency justification proffered below had no factual basis for a search of defendant’s closet where a small grow operation was found. The … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.-M.: Military def counsel ineffective for not making a suppression motion that would have been granted

N.D.Tex.: Def counsel wasn’t obliged to argue a Franks issue to the jury at trial; that’s presumptively strategy

Defense counsel wasn’t obliged to raise a Franks issue in closing argument. That’s quintessentially a strategic decision. “The Supreme Court has recognized that ‘judicious selection of arguments for summation is a core exercise of defense counsel’s discretion,’ and counsel ‘is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Def counsel wasn’t obliged to argue a Franks issue to the jury at trial; that’s presumptively strategy