Monthly Archives: March 2015

N.D.N.Y.: Facially deficient motion to suppress is rejected on the merits

Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and statements is deficient in what it alleges, so the court goes with the government’s version and denies the motion. United States v. Aleem, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182475 (N.D.N.Y. April 30, 2014). Officers had … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Facially deficient motion to suppress is rejected on the merits

CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

A single access to child pornography from an IP address linked to defendant was not enough to find probable cause that the defendant had child pornography on the computer. The good faith exception, however, was sufficient to sustain the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Single incident of viewing CP on computer was not PC to believe CP on computer; GFE applies, however

SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks?

SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks? by Rory Little: Tuesday’s argument in City of Los Angeles v. Patel, a Fourth Amendment case, presents a particularly difficult example of a common Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTYSBlog: Argument preview: Hotel guest registers and the Fourth Amendment – harder than it looks?

Chicago Tribune: Why Apple can afford to get all gooey-eyed over the Fourth Amendment

Chicago Tribune: Why Apple can afford to get all gooey-eyed over the Fourth Amendment by Justin Fox. The last paragraph: Don’t get me wrong. It’s pretty awesome that Apple’s business model allows its chief executive officer to be an outspoken … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Chicago Tribune: Why Apple can afford to get all gooey-eyed over the Fourth Amendment

ATL: Criminally Yours: Your ‘One’ Phone Call

ATL: Criminally Yours: Your ‘One’ Phone Call by Toni Messina Above all, don’t give them your cell phone password Recently a lawyer asked me at a party, “If I’m arrested will police take my cell phone, and if they do, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ATL: Criminally Yours: Your ‘One’ Phone Call

CA6: Motion to suppress body-cam video wasn’t timely or specific; evidentiary prejudice only real issue

Body-cam video admitted, and the motion to suppress it wasn’t timely, even if it would have been granted as showing a potential Miranda violation. The video showed what officers would testify to; to limit it would require it be overly … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Motion to suppress body-cam video wasn’t timely or specific; evidentiary prejudice only real issue

IN: Walking drug dog through house as a probation search was reasonable

Probation searches in Indiana can be by any law enforcement officer on reasonable suspicion, and defendant was on electronic monitoring at home. Such searches are always governed by reasonableness, and the court does not find it unreasonable to walk a … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Walking drug dog through house as a probation search was reasonable

TN: Matching description of robber and being near stolen phone located by its find phone app was RS

A stolen phone’s locator app led the police to defendant, and he matched the description of the robber so there was reasonable suspicion. State v. Sykes, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 132 (February 25, 2015). Defendant was staying at an … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Matching description of robber and being near stolen phone located by its find phone app was RS

MA: Where possession of 1 oz of MJ is a civil infraction, seeing that much in a car doesn’t support a search

Seeing only enough marijuana to be a civil infraction is not probable cause for an automobile exception search of a car. Commonwealth v. Sheridan, 2015 Mass. LEXIS 102 (February 27, 2015):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Where possession of 1 oz of MJ is a civil infraction, seeing that much in a car doesn’t support a search

IA: Stop was admittedly pretextual, but objective facts supported it

Defendant was tried and acquitted of possession and was involved in a forfeiture action. Because he was acquitted the state can’t rely on losing the motion to suppress in the trial court because there was no appeal. The stop was … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on IA: Stop was admittedly pretextual, but objective facts supported it

W.D.Tex.: The collective knowledge rule applies to traffic stops on reasonable suspicion

The collective knowledge rule applies to traffic stops on reasonable suspicion. Questioning while defendant is rummaging around for this papers does not extend the stop. United States v. Saldana, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23850 (W.D.Tex. February 27, 2015). The argument … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: The collective knowledge rule applies to traffic stops on reasonable suspicion

M.D.La.: An interstate bus driver has common authority to consent to search of luggage on his bus[!]

Defendant was a passenger on a Tornado Bus Company bus, a company that hauls primarily Hispanic passengers around the U.S. This trip was from Houston to Atlanta. The bus was stopped in Louisiana for swerving over the line. The driver … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on M.D.La.: An interstate bus driver has common authority to consent to search of luggage on his bus[!]

S.D.W.Va.: Squeezing an express mail envelope not in his possession and feeling pills was not a “search” under Bond

Officers squeezing an express mail envelope not in recipient’s possession and feeling pills was not a “search” under Bond. United States v. Taylor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23978 (S.D.W.Va. February 27, 2015):

Posted in Search | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Squeezing an express mail envelope not in his possession and feeling pills was not a “search” under Bond