Category Archives: Third Party Doctrine

GA: State computer privacy statute doesn’t protect IP information from third-party disclosure

A state computer privacy statute cannot be interpreted to protect IP information from administrative subpoena. The state courts have already held it isn’t protected because it’s third-party information. Courtney v. State, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 56 (Feb. 17, 2017): Here, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on GA: State computer privacy statute doesn’t protect IP information from third-party disclosure

WaPo: How to stop data collection on your Vizio (or other smart) television

WaPo: How to stop data collection on your Vizio (or other smart) television by Hayley Tsukayama:

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: How to stop data collection on your Vizio (or other smart) television

WaPo: These smart TVs were apparently spying on their owners [mere third party data?]

WaPo: These smart TVs were apparently spying on their owners by Hayley Tsukayama. So, if this is third party data, is it subject to mere subpoena and not a search warrant? Feel free to be creeped out. I have a … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: These smart TVs were apparently spying on their owners [mere third party data?]

New Law Review: “The Positive Law Model of the Fourth Amendment,” for evaluating new technological problems and the third-party doctrine

New Law Review: “The Positive Law Model of the Fourth Amendment,” 129 Harv. L. Rev. 1821 (2016) by William Baude & James Y. Stern: For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches” under … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on New Law Review: “The Positive Law Model of the Fourth Amendment,” for evaluating new technological problems and the third-party doctrine

WaPo: Companies may be willing to pay for data from Fitbits, other wearable sensors

WaPo: Companies may be willing to pay for data from Fitbits, other wearable sensors by Des Bieler: Naturally, privacy concerns abound here, and Olshansky emphasized that he was ‘acutely sensitive to those issues.’ He added: ‘We think that personal health … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Companies may be willing to pay for data from Fitbits, other wearable sensors

American Banker: IRS Quest for Coinbase Data Sets Dangerous Precedent

American Banker: IRS Quest for Coinbase Data Sets Dangerous Precedent by Jerry Brito:

Posted in Administrative search, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on American Banker: IRS Quest for Coinbase Data Sets Dangerous Precedent

WA prescription drug monitoring program doesn’t violate 4A or state const’l rights of physicians

The Washington prescription drug monitoring program records do not violate the Fourth Amendment or state constitutional rights of physicians. Alsager v. Bd. of Osteopathic Med. & Surgery, 2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 2768 (Nov. 15, 2016):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WA prescription drug monitoring program doesn’t violate 4A or state const’l rights of physicians

E.D.Pa.: CSLI warrant upheld

CSLI warrant upheld: “ The cell site data obtained by the government is admissible because the government’s actions did not constitute a ‘search’ falling under the protection of the Fourth Amendment. Even if the government had violated the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: CSLI warrant upheld

GA: Police entry onto the curtilage to look into the car windows for a plain view was unreasonable

Police entry onto the curtilage to look into the car windows for a plain view was unreasonable. State v. Vickers, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 610 (Nov. 1, 2016). While there may have been some remedy to the defendant Kentucky Open … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on GA: Police entry onto the curtilage to look into the car windows for a plain view was unreasonable

OR: Adm subpoena was within agency’s power; third party doctrine issue saved for later with better facts

The administrative subpoena issued here by the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services was “squarely” within its statutory investigative power of regulating unregistered securities. “Given the factual and legal posture in which this issue arises, we resolve this case … Continue reading

Posted in State constitution, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Adm subpoena was within agency’s power; third party doctrine issue saved for later with better facts

WaPo: Facebook, Twitter and Instagram sent feeds that helped police track minorities in Ferguson and Baltimore, report says

WaPo: Facebook, Twitter and Instagram sent feeds that helped police track minorities in Ferguson and Baltimore, report says by Craig Timberg and Elizabeth Dwoskin: A powerful surveillance program that police used for tracking racially charged protests in Baltimore and Ferguson, … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Facebook, Twitter and Instagram sent feeds that helped police track minorities in Ferguson and Baltimore, report says

NE: Third party doctrine unchanged: CSLI has no REP

Defendant’s CSLI information was obtained by court order under the Stored Communications Act, and defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in this third party information. State v. Jenkins, 294 Neb. 684, 2016 Neb. LEXIS 133 (Sept. 9, 2016):

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NE: Third party doctrine unchanged: CSLI has no REP

CA7: No REP in IP address because it is broadcast

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the IP address one is using because it’s broadcast far and wide. It is a mere business record under the third party doctrine, and Jones doesn’t alter the third party doctrine. United … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: No REP in IP address because it is broadcast

IN: CSLI is intrusive and protected by 4A; not a mere third party record

CSLI is not just ordinary third party records, and they have Fourth Amendment protection without a warrant. CSLI is collected surreptitiously while bank (Miller) and telephone tolls calls (Smith) are provided willingly and knowingly. Moreover, CSLI is far more intrusive … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on IN: CSLI is intrusive and protected by 4A; not a mere third party record

NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

New Jersey requires a court order, albeit on less than probable cause, to get telephone records. To enable criminal investigations to proceed, probable cause isn’t required. State v. Lunsford, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 717 (Aug. 1, 2016) (syllabus):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

CA4 en banc: CSLI is mere third-party information not requiring SW

CSLI is third-party information the government does not need a warrant to obtain. 221 days worth of information was admissible. It’s up to Congress or SCOTUS to change the third-party doctrine. United States v. Graham, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9797 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA4 en banc: CSLI is mere third-party information not requiring SW

New American: Obama Attacks Sen. Rand Paul for Protecting Fourth Amendment [but not trying to change the third-party doctrine]

New American: Obama Attacks Sen. Rand Paul for Protecting Fourth Amendment by Alex Newman. This is from a source I don’t post from because its stuff is almost always so constitutionally off the wall. This one is particularly worth comment, … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on New American: Obama Attacks Sen. Rand Paul for Protecting Fourth Amendment [but not trying to change the third-party doctrine]

techdirt: National Intelligence Office’s Top Lawyer Fires Off Spirited Defense Of Bulk Surveillance, Third Party Doctrine

techdirt: National Intelligence Office’s Top Lawyer Fires Off Spirited Defense Of Bulk Surveillance, Third Party Doctrine by Tim Cushing: Robert Litt, General Counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, has been given space at the Yale Law … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on techdirt: National Intelligence Office’s Top Lawyer Fires Off Spirited Defense Of Bulk Surveillance, Third Party Doctrine

VT: Broad computer monitoring condition of a sex offender on probation had to be narrowed

A computer monitoring and internet bar probation condition of a convicted sex offender was modified to better match his circumstances. He can have access to the internet, and, on reasonable suspicion, the PO can search his computer. State v. Cornell, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on VT: Broad computer monitoring condition of a sex offender on probation had to be narrowed

Windows IT Pro: Microsoft to DOJ: The cloud isn’t an automatic Fourth Amendment exemption; challenging the third-party doctrine in the Cloud

Windows IT Pro: Microsoft to DOJ: The cloud isn’t an automatic Fourth Amendment exemption by Michael Morisy: Company fights government demands for secret searches of cloud customers

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Windows IT Pro: Microsoft to DOJ: The cloud isn’t an automatic Fourth Amendment exemption; challenging the third-party doctrine in the Cloud