Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

OR: It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement

It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement. State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 273 Ore. App. 298, 356 P.3d 674 (2015) (under submission 2½ years), aff’d, State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 361 Ore. 163, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 166 (March 2, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OR: It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement

CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

Not a search and seizure case, but we need to know it: It was established in 1984 at the time of one plaintiff’s conviction and 1991 of the other plaintiff that police had a duty to provide exculpatory evidence to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Settled by 1984 that Brady applied to police; qualified immunity denied

CA5: Using a Taser on a person no longer resisting is excessive force

Using a Taser on a person no longer resisting is excessive force. The mentally ill plaintiff was at first resisting but then stopped. At that point, it became excessive. Carroll v. Ellington, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15098 (5th Cir. August … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Using a Taser on a person no longer resisting is excessive force

CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

Four witnesses ID’d defendant for a crime. The fact that the charges were later dropped didn’t form a basis for a § 1983 case. There was probable cause and no reasonable jury would conclude otherwise and that’s qualified immunity. Hart … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Witness ID’s enough for arrest thus barring § 1983 case

CA9: Arrest of public defender summoned to court had no qualified immunity

A court security officer’s arrest of plaintiff public defender who was sent to get her to court had no qualified immunity for arresting her just because she sarcastically said “[i]f you want me to come right now, you’ll have to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest of public defender summoned to court had no qualified immunity

DC: Because the circuit hasn’t ruled on the standard for seizure of a child from the home, officials get qualified immunity

The circuits are split on whether a Fourth Amendment seizure of children from the home requires reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Moreover, what is an exigency is not consistent among the circuits. The point is that this circuit has not … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DC: Because the circuit hasn’t ruled on the standard for seizure of a child from the home, officials get qualified immunity

CA9: The statute of limitations for a § 1983 search claim runs from the date of the search

The statute of limitations for a § 1983 search claim runs from the date of the search. Belanus v. Clark, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13648 (9th Cir. August 5, 2015). Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to challenge the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: The statute of limitations for a § 1983 search claim runs from the date of the search

D.P.R.: Failure to challenge standing finding in R&R is waiver

Defendant was found without standing to challenge a search of an apartment, and he didn’t contest that in the R&R, so that’s binding. He did challenge the search of his person, and the case is remanded for further consideration of … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Failure to challenge standing finding in R&R is waiver

CA8: Quantity of alleged excessive force against an arrestee based on extent of injury a jury question

A jail altercation in Ferguson, MO led to the arrestee getting injured and he sued. The district court dismissed on the narrow ground the injuries were “de minimus.” The Eighth Circuit says, no, that’s a jury question here. Davis v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Quantity of alleged excessive force against an arrestee based on extent of injury a jury question

ME: Sufficient evidence supported searching passengers, too

Based on information that defendants’ car had drugs heading into Maine, the car was stopped and the occupants searched. It was all with probable cause, and Pringle controls the search of the passengers because it was reasonable to believe they … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on ME: Sufficient evidence supported searching passengers, too

CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

It was not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable in 2010. Arden v. McIntosh, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12725 (10th Cir. July 23, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Not clearly established that confiscating weapons from a potential suicide even after he was removed to the hospital was unreasonable

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court? by Steve Vladeck: Two weeks ago, I wrote about an important new decision by the US District Court for the District of Arizona, holding that the Fourth Amendment does apply … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Just Security: Are Cross-Border Shootings Heading to the Supreme Court?

CA7: Violation of state time limit for sheriff’s eviction didn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim

Plaintiff’s eviction by sheriff’s deputies took more time than state law allowed, and it was delayed, in part, by the presence of a skunk. He abandoned lots of stuff on the property, and it wasn’t possible to get it all … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Violation of state time limit for sheriff’s eviction didn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law, overruling all past cases. Reasonable suspicion is all that’s needed for a traffic stop, not probable cause. State v. Houghton, 2015 WI 79, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 484 (July 14, 2015). Fleeing into … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Wisconsin adopts Heien on reasonable mistakes of law

PA: DUI accident provided PC for automobile exception search

In a DUI accident, the officer had probable cause to search defendant’s vehicle for evidence of the impairment under the automobile exception. Commonwealth v. Best, 2015 PA Super 151, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 409 (July 16, 2015).* The officer’s participation … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on PA: DUI accident provided PC for automobile exception search

N.D.Ga.: Talking about using drug dog in def’s presence was not “interrogation”

Discussing in defendant’s presence that they were going to use a drug dog as a part of their search was not “interrogation” under Innis. “Here, the conduct of the officers in discussing their investigation within hearing range of the defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Talking about using drug dog in def’s presence was not “interrogation”

CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

The officer here came to serve a summons at plaintiff’s house, and he looked through the window and saw the place was in disarray. He went to the door, and it was unlocked. He never knocked. He decided to perform … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

CA5: Decision to use SRT to execute search warrant was not shown to be unreasonable on the totality

“Based on the totality of the circumstances, Officer Vinson’s decision to deploy the SRT to execute the search warrant for Ms. Bullock’s residence did not constitute force excessive to the need, nor was it objectively unreasonable.” Bailey v. Lawson, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Decision to use SRT to execute search warrant was not shown to be unreasonable on the totality

CA6: “[I]t is objectively unreasonable to frame an inmate” for a crime he didn’t commit

Plaintiff alleged an Art. III “injury in fact” in his claim that he was framed for a crime he didn’t commit. “Because it is objectively unreasonable to frame an inmate, we reverse the district court’s judgment and hold that Price … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA6: “[I]t is objectively unreasonable to frame an inmate” for a crime he didn’t commit

IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage

“[C]ourts have repeatedly and routinely held that a warrant that authorizes the search of ‘premises’ at a given residential address allows the search of detached garages, sheds, and other outbuildings even if these separate structures are not mentioned at all … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: “Premises known as xxx Street” in SW included detached garage on the curtilage