Category Archives: Informant hearsay

D.Utah: Double hearsay can support a SW

In a trade secrets theft case, reliance on double hearsay in the affidavit for search warrant was not unreasonable. The source was the company defendant worked for. Defendant relies on the elements of the trade secrets theft law and argues … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Utah: Double hearsay can support a SW

IL: Two anonymous calls of man with a gun resulted in finding only def in the area who walked like he was holding

The frisk of defendant did not violate the Fourth Amendment, so the trial court did not err by denying defendant’s motion to suppress the firearm. The officer encountered defendant after an unknown caller placed two 911 calls, defendant matched the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Two anonymous calls of man with a gun resulted in finding only def in the area who walked like he was holding

FL5: CI rented car for def to commit a robbery; told police and they put GPS on car; stop was with PC

The CI had knowledge defendant was going to commit a robbery and was enlisted to rent a car for it. The CI told the police, and they planted a GPS on the car with the CI’s permission. After the robbery, … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on FL5: CI rented car for def to commit a robbery; told police and they put GPS on car; stop was with PC

ID: State’s claim of exigency for warrantless entry into house was unsupported; suppression affirmed

Defendant was allegedly selling tainted marijuana from his house. Police did a warrantless entry with exigency as the excuse. There wasn’t any claim that anybody inside was in distress, and no questions about it. Suppression affirmed. State v. Sessions, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: State’s claim of exigency for warrantless entry into house was unsupported; suppression affirmed

LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

Defendant was detained unreasonably without reasonable suspicion and then her car was searched for a weapon but none was found. Then the detaining officer called for a female officer to conduct a search of her person. “Because reasonable suspicion was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

D.N.M.: It’s not a Franks violation to fail to mention any deals with the CI; it’s assumed

“Second, as to Mr. Ramos-Castillo’s argument that Agent Godier omitted material information by failing to include law enforcement’s numerous promises to Mr. Salazar, the Court finds that the failure to explicitly include this information does not amount to material omission … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.N.M.: It’s not a Franks violation to fail to mention any deals with the CI; it’s assumed

W.D.Mo.: Search incident permitted for offense of walking in the street at night

Search incident for walking in the street instead of on the sidewalk was permissible and that produced keys. Alternatively, officers had reasonable suspicion for a “protective patdown” based on other factors. United States v. Cunningham, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164331 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Search incident permitted for offense of walking in the street at night

NC: When two CIs are used, both need to be known and reliable; here, one wasn’t

Defendant raised multiple issues in his motion to suppress that led to a general denial “with some reluctance.” The court of appeals doesn’t find enough in the record to resolve what the court was thinking and vacates and remands for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NC: When two CIs are used, both need to be known and reliable; here, one wasn’t

NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

There was a scrivener’s error in describing the cell phone subject to the search warrant, and it could be corrected by looking to the affidavit. State v. Stelly, 304 Neb. 33 (Sept. 13, 2019). Defendant has no claim that the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

TX1: Warrantless DUI arrest then blood draw without exigency suppressed

After an accident where defendant was alleged to have killed a motorcyclist, defendant waited for the police at a gas station. They took him to the scene and then arrested him. This was followed by a warrantless blood draw. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TX1: Warrantless DUI arrest then blood draw without exigency suppressed

TN: Factual statements from other LEOs not judged as CI statements in affidavit

Relying on factual statements of other law enforcement officers for a search warrant affidavit is more than just adopting the bare conclusions of others. They are entitled to more credibility than statements of CIs. State v. Almahmmody, 2019 Tenn. Crim. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: Factual statements from other LEOs not judged as CI statements in affidavit

OH10: 1st time CI’s admission of own crimes aided his credibility

First time CI’s admission of own criminal involvement bolstered his credibility for use in probable cause. State v. Mendoza, 2019-Ohio-3382, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3457 (10th Dist. Aug. 22, 2019). There was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH10: 1st time CI’s admission of own crimes aided his credibility

CA11: Officer has discretion to let another take vehicle or impound it with inventory, and he can change his mind

Allowing defendant’s vehicle to be taken by another instead of impounding it was within the officer’s discretion. At first he said he would do that, then changed his mind. That doesn’t make the inventory unreasonable. United States v. Sibert, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory | Comments Off on CA11: Officer has discretion to let another take vehicle or impound it with inventory, and he can change his mind

E.D.Mich.: Officers’ efforts to avoid towing vehicle on def’s arrest showed lack of pretext to search it

The government satisfied its burden in showing that the inventory of defendant’s car was reasonable and not for an investigative purpose. Important to that, they attempted to work with defendant to avoid towing the vehicle at all by getting a … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officers’ efforts to avoid towing vehicle on def’s arrest showed lack of pretext to search it

FL2: Def gets benefit of Byrd where issue raised before it was decided; remanded

Defendant was not listed as an authorized driver of a rental car, and he moved to suppress the search of the rental car. Because his case was in “the pipeline,” he gets the benefit of Byrd and the case is … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on FL2: Def gets benefit of Byrd where issue raised before it was decided; remanded

OH2: 911 caller whose number is recorded isn’t really anonymous

911 caller whose number was recorded wasn’t truly anonymous, and the information was detailed and first hand. Even if anonymous, it was still reliable enough. State v. Gregory, 2019-Ohio-3000, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3093 (2d Dist. July 26, 2019):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH2: 911 caller whose number is recorded isn’t really anonymous

IA: Where owner of car was female and had a suspended license, a stop was reasonable when a woman and three men got into it

Officers knew the owner of the car was female, and there was a woman in the group that got into it, so, for reasonable suspicion purposes, it was reasonable to believe she might be driving and stop the car where … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Where owner of car was female and had a suspended license, a stop was reasonable when a woman and three men got into it

MT: 911 call about drunk driver was corroborated when car found

A 911 call reported a potential drunk driver. When the car was found, the officer’s observations were at least reasonable suspicion justifying a stop. Indreland v. Mont. DOJ, 2019 MT 141, 2019 Mont. LEXIS 226 (June 18, 2019). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MT: 911 call about drunk driver was corroborated when car found

E.D.Mich.: Failure to leave a copy of the SW does not require suppression

Failure to leave a copy of the search warrant does not require suppression. There is no prejudice. United States v. Robinson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99902 (E.D. Mich. June 14, 2019). The CI was creditable because of admissions against interest … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Protective sweep, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to leave a copy of the SW does not require suppression

RI: IP address in CP case is PC for the premises

Rhode Island decides for the first time that IP information in a child pornography case is probable cause for the building at that location. Yes, it could be another person at that address, but that’s not the point. In re … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on RI: IP address in CP case is PC for the premises