Category Archives: Standing

W.D.Pa.: Def was not an overnight guest, but his connection to the property was substantial, he had a key, and he could come and go at will, so that’s sufficient

On the spectrum of standing from overnight guest to somebody with minimal connection to the premises, defendant was not an overnight guest, but he had a key and pretty much free reign over the premises. The court concludes he had … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Def was not an overnight guest, but his connection to the property was substantial, he had a key, and he could come and go at will, so that’s sufficient

CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

“The Probation Department employees’ alleged threat to send Repotski back to jail does not state a constitutional violation cognizable under § 1983. See McFadden v. Lucas, 713 F.2d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 1983) (noting that mere threats do not amount … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Search, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

OH2: Part owner of a business didn’t have standing to challenge seizure of surveillance DVR with video of him committing assault

Defendant was a part owner of a business with computer access cards to get in doors. He still didn’t have a sufficient reasonable expectation of privacy in the computer storage system of a surveillance video system showing where he committed … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on OH2: Part owner of a business didn’t have standing to challenge seizure of surveillance DVR with video of him committing assault

W.D.Okla.: Def’s on-again off-again relationship with decedent didn’t give him standing in a search of her premises when they were off-again; he had no key

“Though Defendant may have had an ‘ongoing and meaningful connection to [Zotigh’s] home as a social guest’ at certain times prior to the searches, Zotigh’s termination of their relationship, her refusal to allow Defendant to stay in her mobile home … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def’s on-again off-again relationship with decedent didn’t give him standing in a search of her premises when they were off-again; he had no key

WA grants automatic standing to a car thief but finds inventory of the car reasonable

“We are asked to answer two questions under article I, section 7 of our state constitution: first, whether defendants have standing to challenge the scope of a warrantless inventory search of a vehicle when that vehicle is stolen and, second, … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on WA grants automatic standing to a car thief but finds inventory of the car reasonable

D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

The car that was searched was being hauled by a car carrier. By turning over a car to a car hauler, the car hauler has complete possession and actual and apparent authority to consent to a search, and the person … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A car hauler has actual and apparent authority to consent to a car in his possession for transport

OH8: Misstating the owner of a cell phone in warrant application was not material when it was seized as part of a burglary conspiracy

A burglar alarm in an industrial area at 1 am brought the police who saw men scattering, and one vehicle leaving. There was reasonable suspicion for stopping the vehicle. The search warrant for a cell phone was proper because it … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OH8: Misstating the owner of a cell phone in warrant application was not material when it was seized as part of a burglary conspiracy

M.D.La.: State privacy law confers no additional standing in federal court

As a mere passenger, defendant has no standing to contest a search of the car. “The Court also rejects Defendant’s argument that his state-law right to privacy somehow confers standing in this federal action. Defendant has the burden of establishing … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: State privacy law confers no additional standing in federal court

M.D.Fla.: Guest’s host’s consent was coerced and suppressed

Defendant was an overnight guest with standing. His host’s consent was coerced by the police and wasn’t voluntary. United States v. Powell, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141017 (M.D. Fla. July 16, 2019)*:

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Guest’s host’s consent was coerced and suppressed

E.D.Mich.: Def lacked standing in a hotel room he occasionally frequented but hadn’t been in for 17 days

Officers conducted a raid on hotel rooms for human trafficking evidence. Defendant’s name on a receipt was found in the room from 17 days earlier. He admits that he wasn’t a guest the night before or regularly before the raid. … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def lacked standing in a hotel room he occasionally frequented but hadn’t been in for 17 days

CA11: Ptf’s excessive force claim overcomes QI; his facts show clearly established law violated

Defendants were properly denied qualified immunity in using excessive force to arrest plaintiff. Plaintiff’s version of the facts showed clearly established rights were violated. Heck v. Humphrey didn’t apply because plaintiff wasn’t seeking to attack his conviction. Cendan v. Trujillo, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf’s excessive force claim overcomes QI; his facts show clearly established law violated

TN: Codefendant suppressed contents of a camera, but def can’t because no standing

Codefendant succeeded in suppressing photographs from an illegally seized camera. This defendant, however, had no property or privacy interest in the camera and thus no standing. State v. McClancy, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 473 (Aug 10, 2019).* State’s notice … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Codefendant suppressed contents of a camera, but def can’t because no standing

OH10: Def’s stop turned from consensual to a seizure when the officer saw a baggie of drugs in his hand

Defendant and another were encountered by police after coming out of a drug house. The encounter was consensual until defendant tried to walk away, but the officer had already seen a baggie of drugs in his hand by plain view. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on OH10: Def’s stop turned from consensual to a seizure when the officer saw a baggie of drugs in his hand

OH9: Citizen informant’s 911 call properly admitted at suppression hearing even though hearsay

A 911 call from a citizen informant was properly admitted into evidence becuase hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings. There was a factual basis for defendant’s stop on reasonable suspicion for DUI. The CI’s report was that he was too … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH9: Citizen informant’s 911 call properly admitted at suppression hearing even though hearsay

D.P.R.: Being handed a bag for five seconds wasn’t enough to create standing

Analyzing bailments under PR law and First Circuit and SCOTUS cases (particularly Rawlings), defendant’s precipitous five second holding of a bag handed off to him wasn’t sufficient to create a bailment or give him standing in the bag. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Being handed a bag for five seconds wasn’t enough to create standing

CA1: Standing can’t be based on an untranslated document to put into evidence; even in D.P.R.

Defendant’s claim of standing in the home of another depends upon a Spanish language document [in PR federal court where everyone is bilingual] that was untranslated for the judge [and apparently not for appeal]. Therefore, his standing argument fails. But … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA1: Standing can’t be based on an untranslated document to put into evidence; even in D.P.R.

M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

On the Sixth Circuit’s remand of Byrd v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1518 (2018), to the District Court, the court finds the good faith exception applies to standing issues arising before it was decided. United States v. Byrd, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

N.D.Ala.: Renting bedroom from homeowner and paying in drugs still gave renter standing; but owner had apparent authority to consent

Defendant lived in a drug dealer’s house where he rented the room in exchange for drugs. He had unfettered access to come and go. That gave him standing in his own room. The owner, however, also had unrestricted access to … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Renting bedroom from homeowner and paying in drugs still gave renter standing; but owner had apparent authority to consent

D.Me.: Even if omission was reckless, missing info only added to PC

Even if the officer’s omission was reckless or intentional, adding in the missing information only makes the probable cause stronger. Therefore, his Franks claim fails. United States v. O’Neal, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126426 (D. Me. July 30, 2019).* Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.Me.: Even if omission was reckless, missing info only added to PC

KY: Officers approached men on a street corner talking; telling def to “hang tight for a minute” because he wanted to run his name and SSN was a seizure requiring RS

Officers saw a group on a corner, so they initiated contact, just because they wanted to. They also attempted to get them to clean up the trash on the corner, which wasn’t shown to be their fault or responsibility. When … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Officers approached men on a street corner talking; telling def to “hang tight for a minute” because he wanted to run his name and SSN was a seizure requiring RS