Category Archives: Protective sweep

NJ: Protective sweep of car that nobody was getting back into was unreasonable

Defendant was in a car with three others stopped for traffic violations. None of the four owned the car, but the driver produced the registration and insurance card and admitted his license was suspended. All four were frisked and nothing … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Protective sweep of car that nobody was getting back into was unreasonable

NH: Protective sweep applies to vehicles

Because defendant was known to have weapons and associated with violent persons, a protective sweep of his SUV was permissible under the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. State v. Francis, 2015 N.H. LEXIS 38 (May 12, 2015). Hand-to-hand drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NH: Protective sweep applies to vehicles

CA3: Three connected cases

When the officer went to an apartment in response to a shots fired call, and defendant came running out knocking the officer over, that was reasonable suspicion to detain him. The crack in his hand was dropped. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Three connected cases

E.D.Tex.: Protective sweep was justified just after door opened on knock-and-talk, but court doesn’t even tell us why

Thirteen police came to defendant’s house, and four came on the porch for a knock-and-talk. His wife answered and opened the door three feet. She stepped back and officers entered to conduct a protective sweep. After explaining the reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Protective sweep was justified just after door opened on knock-and-talk, but court doesn’t even tell us why

D.Nev.: Apt was small enough that protective sweep was valid, even to balcony

While the record isn’t clear, the apartment here appears to be small enough that a protective sweep validly covered all the space inside, including the balcony near where defendant was arrested. United States v. Washington, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43617 … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Apt was small enough that protective sweep was valid, even to balcony

D.Alaska: Seizure of a video recording from a child’s bedroom during a drug search warrant was an overseizure and suppressed

The protective sweep of the house before actual arrival of the search warrant was valid because an additional person stuck a head out the window when the officers first knocked, and they had to be sure there wasn’t another. [Since … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Seizure of a video recording from a child’s bedroom during a drug search warrant was an overseizure and suppressed

D.S.D.: Def arrested and handcuffed after hot pursuit into house still justified sweep for his gun

The initial entry into defendant’s home was justified by hot pursuit, but other officers followed after the detention, and a protective sweep was conducted. Because it was reasonably feared defendant was armed and the gun hadn’t been located, a sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def arrested and handcuffed after hot pursuit into house still justified sweep for his gun

IA: Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search

Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search. State v. Johannes, 2015 Iowa App. LEXIS 25 (January 14, 2015). Officers assembled outside a hotel room after neighbors complained that there was yelling and … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Burnt aluminum foil in plain view in a car is probable cause for a search

OH8: Although officers were invited in by apparent consent, protective sweep was justified in dark room with a closet

Officers received a call about a person being held at gunpoint at a house. Dispatch noted to itself that this might be a prank call, but didn’t tell the officers that. They got to the house and were let in. … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH8: Although officers were invited in by apparent consent, protective sweep was justified in dark room with a closet

N.D.Okla.: Longtime boyfriend given standing in girlfriend’s place whether spending night or not

Defendant was the boyfriend of the woman who was the householder, and he had standing to contest the police entry into her home. Whether he was an overnight guest at that moment, the course of their long relationship was such … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Longtime boyfriend given standing in girlfriend’s place whether spending night or not

D.Me.: Protective sweep permissible during knock-and-talk where RS was evident

Police conducted a knock and talk at defendant’s hotel room. They were there investigating sex trafficking and found drug paraphernalia in the hallway outside the room. After they were admitted to the room, a protective sweep was permissible. Buie involved … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Protective sweep permissible during knock-and-talk where RS was evident

CA3: Neither SI, exigency, nor protective sweep permitted re-entry to locate gun

A protective sweep had already occurred and defendant had been removed from his house in handcuffs and the house secured. A gun was suspected as unaccounted for, so they went back to look for it, and this was unreasonable. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on CA3: Neither SI, exigency, nor protective sweep permitted re-entry to locate gun

OH6: Reaching only for glove compartment not a “furtive gesture”

Only reaching toward the glove compartment is not a “furtive gesture.” The police secured defendant in the back of a police car and later searched the glove compartment, and it was not a lawful protective frisk of the car under … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH6: Reaching only for glove compartment not a “furtive gesture”

N.D.Ohio: A pretextual traffic stop can’t be used to remove a tracking device

The government doesn’t have the authority to have its officers simply stop a motorist under the guise of a traffic stop to remove a tracking device. Because tracking devices are always removed surreptitiously, there is no law on this anywhere. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, GPS / Tracking Data, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: A pretextual traffic stop can’t be used to remove a tracking device

N.D.Iowa: Strong ether odor big factor in PC for a meth lab

The Eighth Circuit has long held that the odor of ether is a strong factor in probable cause for a methamphetamine lab. Here, the affidavit for the search warrant recounted many other factors in his past drug history. At the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Strong ether odor big factor in PC for a meth lab

D.S.D.: Danger not defused, so officer could conduct frisk; it’s “akin to the doctrine of a ‘protective sweep'”

I’ve analogized a frisk of a car authorized under Long as a ‘protective sweep,’ which is usually of a dwelling. Here, a court does too: Officers responded to a use of force report that had been not completely defused. When … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Danger not defused, so officer could conduct frisk; it’s “akin to the doctrine of a ‘protective sweep'”

N.D.Ga.: Buie in the real world; it’s not always clear

The protective sweep in defendant’s small home was not justified by the circumstances, but it did not taint the subsequent consent. United States v. Smallwood, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96248 (N.D. Ga. June 27, 2014). Interesting discussion of Buie before … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Buie in the real world; it’s not always clear

OH5: Meth lab was in a building not on the curtilage

The meth lab on defendant’s property was not on the curtilage. It was a separate building away from the house. State v. Schorr, 2014-Ohio-2992, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 2933 (5th Dist. July 2, 2014).* The officer here was justified in … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Meth lab was in a building not on the curtilage

D.D.C.: Closet in small apartment was proper subject of a protective sweep

A closet was the proper subject of a protective sweep during a warranted arrest in a small apartment. It took defendant a while to answer the door, and there was a noise from the closet. Buie specifically recognizes this. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Closet in small apartment was proper subject of a protective sweep

E.D.Tenn.: Protective sweep invalid

Defendant was arrested outside and asked to go inside to get warm. They all sat in the kitchen. There was no reason for one officer to decide to walk through the rest of the house because there was no proffered … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Protective sweep invalid