Category Archives: Probable cause

IL: Heroin overdose victim injected with Narcan is PC to arrest for possession

When the police come upon a heroin overdose and inject Narcan, there is probable cause to arrest the defendant for possession. People v. Teper, 2016 IL App (2d) 160063, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 794 (Nov. 17, 2016):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: Heroin overdose victim injected with Narcan is PC to arrest for possession

MA: Officer’s observation of obvious drug transaction by car pulling up on street was PC

The experienced police officer’s observation of defendant reaching into a car with Maine LPN was consistent with “car meets” for drug sales, and that was probable cause. Commonwealth v. Sanders, 2016 Mass. App. LEXIS 164 (Nov. 15, 2016). Plaintiff complained … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Officer’s observation of obvious drug transaction by car pulling up on street was PC

MD: Dog sniff two months earlier didn’t justify search incident on arrest

Defendant’s car was subjected to a drug dog sniff in March 2014 finding drugs, but he wasn’t arrested. Arrest warrants were issued later, and two months later he was arrested. A search incident for drugs wasn’t valid two months later, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on MD: Dog sniff two months earlier didn’t justify search incident on arrest

N.D.Cal.: Cursory look at cell phone that revealed nothing doesn’t preclude PC for SW

A cursory search of a codefendant’s phone produced nothing and a cursory look at defendant’s phone didn’t either. That does not, however, preclude a finding of probable cause to believe that there was evidence on the phone for a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Cursory look at cell phone that revealed nothing doesn’t preclude PC for SW

NY co.ct.: Noting split in case law, slight smell of MJ in the passenger compartment generally doesn’t justify a search of the trunk; here, however, trunk accessible from inside car

Noting a split in authorities, the court finds that the smell of marijuana in the passenger compartment [here, coming off the rental agreement] does not give probable cause to search the trunk. Here, however, the trunk was accessible from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY co.ct.: Noting split in case law, slight smell of MJ in the passenger compartment generally doesn’t justify a search of the trunk; here, however, trunk accessible from inside car

IA: All specifics of lack of PC need to be raised in trial court; here, this argument was waived

Defendant was stopped for having one headlight. The specific claim that there was no probable cause for pulling him over because he wasn’t on a public road was never presented to the trial court, and it’s waived. State v. Tusler, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: All specifics of lack of PC need to be raised in trial court; here, this argument was waived

OH5: Raw marijuana shake around in the front area of the car was PC for a search

Raw marijuana shake around in the front area of the car was probable cause for a search. State v. James, 2016-Ohio-7660, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4531 (5th Dist. Oct. 31, 2016). “In conclusion, Pankey is incorrect to present this case … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Raw marijuana shake around in the front area of the car was PC for a search

TX14: Dashcam video didn’t support officer’s version and appellate court won’t reverse suppression order

The dashcam video doesn’t support the state’s contention defendant was weaving before the stop, and there is no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s findings suppressing the stop for a “welfare check” that led to a DUI arrest. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX14: Dashcam video didn’t support officer’s version and appellate court won’t reverse suppression order

S.D.Cal.: Admission of MJ in the trunk was PC; officer didn’t have to check on MMJ prescription

An admission defendant had marijuana in the trunk didn’t require the officer to check into whether defendant had a prescription for it. United States v. Robbins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153558 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 3, 2016). Defense counsel did, in fact, … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Admission of MJ in the trunk was PC; officer didn’t have to check on MMJ prescription

D.N.M.: Def’s sister had keys to his storage units, and inquiry by the police led them to reasonably believe she had apparent authority

Defendant’s sister still had apparent authority to consent to search of his storage unit even though she didn’t know the access codes and she’d never been there. After inquiry by the police, it was reasonable for them to believe that … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s sister had keys to his storage units, and inquiry by the police led them to reasonably believe she had apparent authority

M.D.Ala.: Omission of city and county from address in SW wasn’t fatal where place to be searched was still apparent

The fact the affidavit had the address but no city and county doesn’t violate the particularity requirement. Yes, it would have been better to have done so, but the officers still could find the place they were looking for, so … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Omission of city and county from address in SW wasn’t fatal where place to be searched was still apparent

E.D.Mich.: SW for human body parts wasn’t a general warrant

Defendant was accused of unlawfully trafficking in human body parts, and the search warrant for his premises for body parts was not a general warrant. United States v. Rathburn, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140562 (E.D.Mich. Oct. 11, 2016). [It seems … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: SW for human body parts wasn’t a general warrant

D.Neb.: Def could file second motion to suppress on different ground; this one prevails for lack of PC and no GFE

Defendant filed a motion to suppress on one ground and lost. He was not prohibited by law of the case from arguing the different issue of a complete lack of probable cause in a subsequent motion, on which he prevails. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def could file second motion to suppress on different ground; this one prevails for lack of PC and no GFE

MA: PC showing was close, but, essentially, ties go in support of the warrant

The trial court held that the affidavit for the search warrant did not show probable cause under Aguilar-Spinelli (still followed in Massachusetts), but the court of appeals disagrees and reverses. There were direct police observations that corroborated the informant’s story. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: PC showing was close, but, essentially, ties go in support of the warrant

W.D.Mo.: Affidavit for SW did not mention CP but SW did; seizure of CP suppressed

Defendant was a suspect in identity theft and failure to register as a sex offender. The search warrant affidavit supported those offenses, but it also included child pornography yet no facts supporting a search for child pornography. Once in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Affidavit for SW did not mention CP but SW did; seizure of CP suppressed

E.D.Va.: Fact of a sex crime against a child does not, without more, mean there is CP on def’s computer

Mere evidence of forcible sodomy on a child does not ipso facto mean that there is probable cause to believe that there will be child pornography on the defendant’s computer, too. Only one circuit would make that inferential link (CA8), … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Fact of a sex crime against a child does not, without more, mean there is CP on def’s computer

D.Mass.: Another Playpen warrant upheld

Another Playpen warrant upheld. United States v. Allain, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134605 (D.Mass. Sept. 29, 2016).* This white collar case warrant was based on probable cause and was sufficiently particular. Good faith also would sustain the warrant. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Another Playpen warrant upheld

CA8: Detention of def’s semi for SW on PC was reasonable

Defendant was not in custody in this child pornography investigation when he was interrogated, and he even left the scene. “In light of the background investigation and Zavesky’s statements, law enforcement officers had probable cause to detain Zavesky’s semi-truck after … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Detention of def’s semi for SW on PC was reasonable

MA: Not being on the rental agreement as a permitted driver not an offense under state law for arrest

Defendant was driving a rental car rented by his mother that limited driving to her alone. Still, that didn’t make defendant guilty of anything under state law, and impounding and inventorying the car was unreasonable. Commonwealth v. Campbell, 2016 Mass. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Not being on the rental agreement as a permitted driver not an offense under state law for arrest

S.D.N.Y.: PC was shown, partly based on LEO’s expert opinion

There was probable cause for the search warrant in this case, partly based on a law enforcement officer’s expert opinion about drug trafficking. United States v. Lights, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130915 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2016). Another two Playpen cases; … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: PC was shown, partly based on LEO’s expert opinion