Category Archives: Social media warrants

E.D.Mich.: Giving password to computer and Facebook account waived REP as to that person

Defendant gave his passwords to his computer and Facebook to his victim. Her searches are not Fourth Amendment violations. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169622 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 1, 2019). The state’s admission on appeal that they … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Giving password to computer and Facebook account waived REP as to that person

E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

Knowing that defendant and his confederates talked about drug transactions on Facebook messenger, the limited search warrant for that was based on probable cause, and a message was recovered referring to acquiring a “ball” and it was almost certainly an … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

W.D.Ky.: There is no suppression remedy for obtaining IP information from Facebook

IP information from Facebook is not subject to suppression by statute. There are civil and criminal penalties, and that’s it. As for the search warrant for his house, it was constitutionally particular. United States v. Carter, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: There is no suppression remedy for obtaining IP information from Facebook

Reason: No Probable Cause Required for Cops To Access User Data From Popular Apps

Reason: No Probable Cause Required for Cops To Access User Data From Popular Apps by Ben McDonald: Only three states require police to obtain a warrant before requesting private user data from companies.

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on Reason: No Probable Cause Required for Cops To Access User Data From Popular Apps

LA4: Def has no REP in his shooting victim’s Instagram account

Defendant was accused of a murder. The state got a search warrant for the victim’s Instagram account, and he moved to suppress. [Remember, Louisiana gives broad standing, but, still] He has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched. … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on LA4: Def has no REP in his shooting victim’s Instagram account

E.D.N.Y.: Facebook SW was far too broad, but court declines to decide 4A question and goes with GFE instead

This Facebook warrant just seeks way, way too much information when it could have been far more narrowly tailored. “That said, the court need not decide whether the Facebook Warrant violated the Fourth Amendment because, even if it did, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Facebook SW was far too broad, but court declines to decide 4A question and goes with GFE instead

Virginia Gazette: Police department searches of social media, cellphone data increasingly common

Virginia Gazette: Police department searches of social media, cellphone data increasingly common by Steve Roberts Jr: According to a Virginia Gazette analysis of 511 search warrants digitized and filed in the Williamsburg-James City County Circuit Court since 2011, there has … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Virginia Gazette: Police department searches of social media, cellphone data increasingly common

CA8: PC shown for Facebook SW; no suppression just because Facebook produced on the 15th day

Officers had seen photographs on defendant’s Facebook page holding guns, and he was a convicted felon. There was thus probable cause for a search warrant to Facebook to produce the account. The warrant was served on Facebook with a 14 … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: PC shown for Facebook SW; no suppression just because Facebook produced on the 15th day

Forbes: Utah Bans Police From Searching Digital Data Without A Warrant, Closes Fourth Amendment Loophole

Forbes: Utah Bans Police From Searching Digital Data Without A Warrant, Closes Fourth Amendment Loophole by Nick Sibilla:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Forbes: Utah Bans Police From Searching Digital Data Without A Warrant, Closes Fourth Amendment Loophole

New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online

New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online by Wayne A. Logan & Jake Linford, Minnesota Law Review, Forthcoming: Abstract:

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online

S.D.N.Y.: SW over use of Instragram justifies SW for cell phone as source

Defendant’s alleged use of Instagram justifies a search warrant for his cell phone as the source of the usage. United States v. Sosa, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58467 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 5, 2019):

Posted in Cell phones, Social media warrants | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW over use of Instragram justifies SW for cell phone as source

N.D.Ga.: No nexus shown for Facebook SW, but GFE applied

The District Court disagrees with the USMJ that there was probable cause and nexus for a search warrant for defendant’s Facebook page. But, reasonable judges disagree, and that is enough for the court to conclude that the good faith exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No nexus shown for Facebook SW, but GFE applied

S.D.Ill.: Merely living in a house and being alleged to be a criminal doesn’t create nexus; more is required, and the govt had it here

It is settled in this circuit that merely because a person lives in a house doesn’t create a nexus to the house for crime; more is required. Here, the government gets over that hurdle. Defendant was overheard talking about having … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Merely living in a house and being alleged to be a criminal doesn’t create nexus; more is required, and the govt had it here

E.D.Mo.: Def has no standing to challenge SW for another person’s Facebook account

Defendant was charged with drug dealing and the overdose death of A.C. He has no standing to challenge the search warrant for A.C.’s Facebook account. United States v. Brewer, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220055 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 18, 2018). Despite … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Def has no standing to challenge SW for another person’s Facebook account

Cal.4: There is no 4A issue in police creating fake social media identities to “friend” a suspect to see more private pages

There is no Fourth Amendment issue in a police officer posing as a false friend on social media accounts to see defendant’s private pages he shares with others. Here, defendant was seen wearing a gold chain taken from his robbery … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Social media warrants | Comments Off on Cal.4: There is no 4A issue in police creating fake social media identities to “friend” a suspect to see more private pages

D.S.D.: SW affidavit attachments referred to in affidavit and were used at the pre-search briefing to narrow the search

The application for the search warrant could have been more clear, but it was still apparent that the attachments were incorporated, and they completed the probable cause showing. Moreover, the attachments were used in the pre-search briefing of the officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.S.D.: SW affidavit attachments referred to in affidavit and were used at the pre-search briefing to narrow the search

D.Kan.: All SW needed to prove was that def had a Facebook account, but the police sought the entire contents of the account; suppressed as overbroad

Defendant doesn’t lose standing to contest a Facebook warrant because he’s a sex offender and the Facebook terms of service state that sex offenders can’t have accounts. He had an account, and he had standing. While this court has found … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Kan.: All SW needed to prove was that def had a Facebook account, but the police sought the entire contents of the account; suppressed as overbroad

D.Conn.: Posting things to Facebook is a waiver of any REP, even in a “friends” setting

By posting to Facebook, even with a friends only setting, defendant waived his reasonable expectation of privacy in his postings. On the merits of the search warrant for Facebook, probable cause was shown. United States v. Westley, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Posting things to Facebook is a waiver of any REP, even in a “friends” setting

E.D.N.Y.: Facebook warrants have to be broad; showing the crime under investigation is limit enough

If probable cause is shown, Facebook warrants have to be broad. There must be some attempt to limit by at least the crime under investigation, but the result will likely be production of the entire account. That is not unreasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Facebook warrants have to be broad; showing the crime under investigation is limit enough

Cal: Victim and witness’s public social media pages subject to subpoena by defense (with a history of the SCA)

Murder defendants sought private and public Facebook pages of the victim and state’s witnesses for their defense. The court of appeals quashed, and the court remands. The public pages shall be produced because they are public by consent. There’s a … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on Cal: Victim and witness’s public social media pages subject to subpoena by defense (with a history of the SCA)