Category Archives: Good faith exception

IN: Private university’s police dept serves police function; records thus public

Notre Dame’s police department serves a police function, therefore a public function, and it is subject to public records disclosure, even though the university as a whole isn’t. [So, no private search doctrine?] ESPN, Inc. v. Univ. of Notre Dame … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Private search | Comments Off on IN: Private university’s police dept serves police function; records thus public

D.Minn.: When lack of PC for SW is raised, this court looks to whether there was enough for reliance on SW to be objectively reasonable

Defendant argued lack of probable cause for search warrants for two vehicles and a computer, so the court goes first to good faith and analyzes the probable cause through that lens finding that reliance on the warrants with this much … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: When lack of PC for SW is raised, this court looks to whether there was enough for reliance on SW to be objectively reasonable

W.D.Va.: Four corners rule does not apply to additional facts supporting good faith exception

Defendant’s original motion didn’t support standing but his brief did, and the court finds he was an overnight guest with standing. “At the outset, the court seriously doubts that the search warrant in this case was valid. While a magistrate’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Four corners rule does not apply to additional facts supporting good faith exception

N.D.Cal.: Pre-Riley warrantless state search of cell phone was valid, so GFE applies

Defendant’s cell phone was searched without a warrant pre-Riley under California’s Diaz which expressly permitted warrantless cell phone searches. Therefore, that search was valid at the time under the good faith exception. United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Pre-Riley warrantless state search of cell phone was valid, so GFE applies

CAAF: Consent was withdrawn before seizure, and seizure lacked PC; no GFE for later SW

Defendant orally withdrew his consent before seizure of his computers and again in writing the next day. The seizure violated the Fourth Amendment because there wasn’t probable cause at the time, and that undermines the government’s alternative argument that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CAAF: Consent was withdrawn before seizure, and seizure lacked PC; no GFE for later SW

IL: Warrantless blood draws pre-Neely are valid under GFE

Illinois law before McNeely permitted warrantless blood draws, and pre-McNeely searches would be valid under Davis good faith. People v. Harrison, 2016 IL App (5th) 150048, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 73 (Feb. 18, 2016). A 2254 petitioner gets a COA … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Warrantless blood draws pre-Neely are valid under GFE

N.D.Cal.: Guilt by association here clearly wasn’t enough for a cell phone and CSLI search warrant, and GFE doesn’t apply

The cell phone and CSLI warrant were truly lacking in probable cause as to defendant. There was but a passing reference to him in an effort to show guilt by association, and that clearly was not a sufficient showing of … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Guilt by association here clearly wasn’t enough for a cell phone and CSLI search warrant, and GFE doesn’t apply

FL5: SW in burglary had no nexus, was fatally overbroad, and no GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant in this case completely lacked probable cause by showing a nexus to defendant, 12 other burglaries, and the place to be searched. Moreover, the list of things to be seized was completely without particularity … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Overbreadth | Comments Off on FL5: SW in burglary had no nexus, was fatally overbroad, and no GFE

D.N.M.: While affiant wasn’t sworn, other witnesses were in testifying on application

Defendant consented to a search after being told of the right to refuse. Officers also sought a search warrant for a safe from a tribal judge, and the affiant wasn’t sworn to. Additional testimony was, however. The consent saves the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.N.M.: While affiant wasn’t sworn, other witnesses were in testifying on application

MO: Even though SI was well after Gant, state hadn’t overruled prior authority, so David GFE applies

Even though Gant was decided in 2009, and Davis good faith post-Gant was decided in 2011, and the search incident here was in 2012, the good faith exception would be applied to save an unreasonable search incident because the state … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on MO: Even though SI was well after Gant, state hadn’t overruled prior authority, so David GFE applies

CA11: Two men, two beds = common authority over room

When two men shared a room with two beds, one can consent to a search of the whole room. This is joint custody and control. “Marvin had common authority to consent to search his shared bedroom, including Espinoza’s designated side … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Two men, two beds = common authority over room

Good faith as a part of inventory searches? In Ohio since at least 1992. Coming to a court near you. Is good faith being subsumed into the “reasonableness” inquiry?

In 2009’s Herring, “good faith” is referred to in the majority opinion seven times as a reason for not applying the exclusionary rule. There it was a search incident to a recalled arrest warrant, a Warrantless search. In Ohio, at … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on Good faith as a part of inventory searches? In Ohio since at least 1992. Coming to a court near you. Is good faith being subsumed into the “reasonableness” inquiry?

C.D.Cal.: Davis applies to GPS placed three years before Jones

A GPS device was placed on defendant’s motorbike in Phnom Penh, Cambodia in 2009 by a CI working for the U.S. government. Davis applies because Jones wasn’t decided until 2012. United States v. Boyajian, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170782 (C.D.Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Davis applies to GPS placed three years before Jones

W.D.Okla.: Rare successful Franks challenge on reckless statements of fact

Defendant made a successful Franks challenge in his drug case. The officer affiant was reckless in overstating facts that were critical to the finding of probable cause and the warrant was suppressed because a Franks violation means no good faith … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Rare successful Franks challenge on reckless statements of fact

Cal.5th: Schmerber applies pre-McNeely and def’s statement he was withdrawing from meth was exigency for a blood draw

Schmerber not McNeely was the law at the time of the blood draw here, and Davis means that Schmerber applies. Here, defendant said to a nurse he was withdrawing from methamphetamine and that reasonably was exigency. People v. Jimenez, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.5th: Schmerber applies pre-McNeely and def’s statement he was withdrawing from meth was exigency for a blood draw

IL: Where statute on which seizure was based was later held unconstitutional, it is void ab initio; Krull and Davis not followed

In People v. Aguilar, 2013 IL 112116, 377 Ill. Dec. 405, 2 N.E.3d 321 (2013), the Illinois Supreme Court held facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment the state flat prohibition on possession of firearms outside the home. This defendant’s arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Where statute on which seizure was based was later held unconstitutional, it is void ab initio; Krull and Davis not followed

D.Minn.: Assuming that the SW affidavit lacked PC, defendant makes no effort to show that the affidavit fit any of the exceptions to the GFE

Even assuming that the search warrant affidavit lacked probable cause, defendant makes no effort to show that the affidavit fit any of the exceptions to the good faith exception. United States v. Pettis, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154439 (D.Minn. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Assuming that the SW affidavit lacked PC, defendant makes no effort to show that the affidavit fit any of the exceptions to the GFE

VA: Davis good faith saves SI of a cell phone before Riley; even though no state case permitted it, CA4 did

Defendant’s cell phone was searched without a warrant months before Riley even had its cert grant. Even though no state case held that the warrant requirement applied to cell phones, the Fourth Circuit had concluded that the search incident doctrine … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on VA: Davis good faith saves SI of a cell phone before Riley; even though no state case permitted it, CA4 did

CA7: GPS installation 2 yrs before Jones was in good faith no matter how you cut it

Here the GPS was put on defendant’s vehicle two years before Jones and stayed 55 days. It was replaced repeatedly because of dead batteries or because it fell off. Defendant tried to get around Davis good faith by arguing that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA7: GPS installation 2 yrs before Jones was in good faith no matter how you cut it

VA: Davis-type good faith exception applies to the length of the detention where Rodriguez decided while case on appeal

Davis-type good faith exception applies to a violation of Rodriguez on the length of the detention where no state or Fourth Circuit case said an overlong stop was unreasonable. (Rodriguez was decided while the appeal was pending, but the defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on VA: Davis-type good faith exception applies to the length of the detention where Rodriguez decided while case on appeal