Category Archives: Good faith exception

PA: Nexus not shown for house, and no GFE under state law: def arrested blocks from home with firearm, and that doesn’t mean more at home

Defendant shot at a cop and committed other felonies. He was sentenced to 66-132 years. He was arrested as a prohibited person with a firearm blocks from his home. The state showed no nexus to the house for other evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: Nexus not shown for house, and no GFE under state law: def arrested blocks from home with firearm, and that doesn’t mean more at home

E.D.Mich.: Warrantless CSLI valid no matter how Carpenter comes out

CSLI information was obtained without a court order. Despite Carpenter being argued November 29th, the current law is that this wasn’t unreasonable. If Carpenter wins, defendant can move to reconsider. [What an empty gesture that is.] United States v. Arnold, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Warrantless CSLI valid no matter how Carpenter comes out

NJ: Failure of affidavit for SW to say which apartment was def’s was fatal error under state const.

There was a reasonable basis for finding probable cause that drug sales were occurring from defendant’s house, but the affidavit for the warrant failed to show which apartment in a 30 unit complex was his. Since New Jersey doesn’t recognize … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ: Failure of affidavit for SW to say which apartment was def’s was fatal error under state const.

CA10: Catch-all phrase with “not limited to” in SW makes it overly general and no GFE

In an unpublished opinion (that will at least be in Federal Appendix), the Tenth Circuit holds that the use of a “catch-all” phrase and “not limited to” in a search warrant made it incurably overbroad. The court also held that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA10: Catch-all phrase with “not limited to” in SW makes it overly general and no GFE

E.D.Va.: Circuit authority doesn’t require SW for CSLI, so there’s no point in waiting for Carpenter

CSLI without a search warrant is permitted under the law of this circuit, so there’s no point in waiting for Carpenter to be decided. [Without explicitly saying it, Davis good faith exception will apply.] United States v. Simmons, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Circuit authority doesn’t require SW for CSLI, so there’s no point in waiting for Carpenter

N.D.Ga.: Facebook SW was valid when issued, but later case law said it would have been overbroad; valid by GFE

The Facebook warrant here was overbroad, but it was consistent with case law at the time. Later case law said that it would have been overbroad. Nevertheless, reliance on case law at the time the search warrant was issued is … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Facebook SW was valid when issued, but later case law said it would have been overbroad; valid by GFE

CA2: Traffic stop ignored traffic inquiries and went into carrying drugs within 5 minutes; unreasonable under Rodriguez but valid at time, so GFE applies

“This appeal arises out of a traffic stop of Defendant-Appellant Brayan Gomez and his resulting judgment of conviction for heroin-trafficking …. During the five-minute traffic stop prompted by multiple traffic violations, the officers prolonged Gomez’s seizure by asking him narcotics-related … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Traffic stop ignored traffic inquiries and went into carrying drugs within 5 minutes; unreasonable under Rodriguez but valid at time, so GFE applies

AZ: State didn’t argue GFE and court gives it a pass

The state didn’t raise the good faith exception in the trial court, but the court applies the “we can affirm on any ground” rule to apply it anyway. State v. Weakland, 2017 Ariz. App. LEXIS 202 (Nov. 28, 2017):

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Standards of review | Comments Off on AZ: State didn’t argue GFE and court gives it a pass

LA5: Five armed robberies in a month was exigency for ping order; GFE applied, too

Police developed defendant as a suspect in a string of five armed robberies in a month, and they sought and obtained an exigent circumstances cell phone ping order of defendant’s phone. His argument is that there were no exigent circumstances … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on LA5: Five armed robberies in a month was exigency for ping order; GFE applied, too

D.Kan.: AOL’s TOS deny an objective REP in CP transmitted by email (on remand from CA10)

In the district court’s original opinion, reversed for reconsideration in United States v. Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016), the district court assumed defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his emails. On remand, the court determines that … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Kan.: AOL’s TOS deny an objective REP in CP transmitted by email (on remand from CA10)

S.D.Tex.: Third Leon test essentially shores up PC here

The affidavit for the child pornography search warrant here was issued at least with a reasonable belief in probable cause under the third Leon test. [The court should have just found probable cause because it certainly looks like there is … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Third Leon test essentially shores up PC here

PA: One def pleads state constitution and wins, one doesn’t and loses

Birchfield came down after the blood draw in this case. Defendant only pled the Fourth Amendment and did not cite the state constitution. There is no good faith exception to the Pennsylvania exclusionary rule, but there is to the federal, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: One def pleads state constitution and wins, one doesn’t and loses

CA1: Using def’s keys to find his apt door was a “search” but it was still in GF even though that fact was in warrant application for apt

Defendant was arrested for drug dealing outside his apartment building. A search incident produced a set of keys. The police tried the keys on the apartment door until they worked. They didn’t enter but used the facts they’d developed plus … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Search | Comments Off on CA1: Using def’s keys to find his apt door was a “search” but it was still in GF even though that fact was in warrant application for apt

NE: Birchfield was decided day after def’s DUI conviction; GFE applies

Defendant was convicted of DUI the day before Birchfield was decided, and he moved for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion, and he appeals. The good faith exception applies to that which happened before Birchfield (without even … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on NE: Birchfield was decided day after def’s DUI conviction; GFE applies

SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

TX: Dissent added to Texas’s adopting Davis good faith exception to statutory exclusionary rule

Back in March was this post: Texas finally adopts the Davis good faith exception to its statutory exclusionary rule reporting on McClintock v. State, 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 291 (March 22, 2017). A dissent was just added in McClintock … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX: Dissent added to Texas’s adopting Davis good faith exception to statutory exclusionary rule

N.D.W.Va.: GFE generally doesn’t apply to warrantless searches

Defendant’s wife did not voluntarily consent to the police entry into the basement of her bar. First, they detained defendant behind the bar. Then police came to the bar in great numbers (6-15, depending on the witness) while the bar … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: GFE generally doesn’t apply to warrantless searches

E.D.Va.: While def’s Navy commander in CA couldn’t authorize military search on a base in VA, GFE applies

Defendant was in the Navy, and, due to a potential rape allegation against him, a pretext text message was sent to him by NCIS on behalf of the alleged victim. Defendant was stationed in San Diego, but he was in … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: While def’s Navy commander in CA couldn’t authorize military search on a base in VA, GFE applies

CA8: (1) In drug conspiracy case, the govt overcame staleness because of ongoing crime; (2) Issuance of SW in D.Neb. by non-cross designated USMJ in N.D.Iowa was subject to GFE

First, the search warrant in this drug conspiracy case wasn’t stale, although a long time had elasped during and between the times recorded in the affidavit of things that happened. While the evidence wasn’t strong, the deference accorded the issuing … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA8: (1) In drug conspiracy case, the govt overcame staleness because of ongoing crime; (2) Issuance of SW in D.Neb. by non-cross designated USMJ in N.D.Iowa was subject to GFE

D.Minn.: PC for SW doesn’t even need to be decided if the GFE would apply

Probable cause doesn’t even need to be decided if the good faith exception would apply. “Even assuming without deciding that the search warrants lacked probable cause, the Court concludes that the evidence is nonetheless admissible under the good-faith exception to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn.: PC for SW doesn’t even need to be decided if the GFE would apply