Category Archives: Good faith exception

WA: Breath test was valid as search incident

A breath test conducted under the implied consent law is a valid search incident to arrest. The state constitution does not impose a higher standard. State v. Nelson, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 354 (Feb. 14, 2019). Defendant didn’t raise a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WA: Breath test was valid as search incident

N.D.Ohio: Corroboration of CI for rectal SW was thin, but GFE applies

Based on a CI that was partially corroborated, officers believed defendant was concealing drugs in his rectum. They obtain a search warrant for a rectal search. The probable cause from the CI is thin. “Basic fairness requires the government to … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Corroboration of CI for rectal SW was thin, but GFE applies

Two controlled buys: one not done right, one good

The search warrant was based on a controlled buy, but the CI doing the buy was controlled enough to know that what was acquired came from defendant. Therefore, probable cause is lacking, and the good faith exception won’t be applied. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on Two controlled buys: one not done right, one good

CA7: SW affidavit failed to show nexus, but it was close enough for GFE

The affidavit for a search warrant for a third person’s home where defendant spent a lot of time was deficient on showing nexus and defendant’s connection to it, but it otherwise showed probable cause. Actually, right after three controlled buys, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA7: SW affidavit failed to show nexus, but it was close enough for GFE

OH5: Officers continually refreshed the voluntariness of the encounter so consent valid

Defendant’s consent to search was ‘voluntary, uncoerced and valid’ and the detectives continually refreshed the voluntariness of the encounter, and continued to meet with complete cooperation from defendant. State v. Gomez, 2019-Ohio-481, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 499 (5th Dist. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH5: Officers continually refreshed the voluntariness of the encounter so consent valid

CA11: PC showing in SW affidavit but “we cannot say that the officer’s reliance on the warrant was unreasonable.”

The affidavit for the search warrant didn’t clearly identify defendant as connected to the property or that there was drug trafficking just from the trash pulls, but it showed that there was drug activity. The court cannot say, however, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA11: PC showing in SW affidavit but “we cannot say that the officer’s reliance on the warrant was unreasonable.”

IA: Def’s consent to patdown for weapons wasn’t consent to open container that could not have contained a weapon

Defendant consented to a patdown for weapons. Removing an object and opening it that couldn’t be holding a weapon exceeded the consent. State v. Hampton, 2019 Iowa App. LEXIS 108 (Feb. 6, 2019). The evidence the police gathered showed that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IA: Def’s consent to patdown for weapons wasn’t consent to open container that could not have contained a weapon

Bloomberg Law: FBI Exceeded GPS Tracking Warrant, But Convictions Survive

Bloomberg Law: FBI Exceeded GPS Tracking Warrant, But Convictions Survive by Porter Wells: Duo of bank robbers ‘à la Bonnie and Clyde’ tracked by GPS Violating warrant terms not same as violating Fourth Amendment

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: FBI Exceeded GPS Tracking Warrant, But Convictions Survive

N.D.Ga.: Def showed no standing in a rented getaway car that they didn’t get back into before arrest where the car was rented with fake ID

Failure to attach search warrant to amended motion to suppress was abandonment of the motion. As to a rental car that was to be the getaway car in a robbery, rented with fake ID, defendant lacked standing. Moreover, there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def showed no standing in a rented getaway car that they didn’t get back into before arrest where the car was rented with fake ID

CA7: Exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of federal supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of federal supervised release, applying Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 (1998). United States v. Phillips, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 2799 (7th Cir. Jan. 28, 2019). CSLI … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA7: Exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of federal supervised release

CA2: Where PC was a close question, the court instead decides GFE applies

“The existence of probable cause in this case presents a close question. We need not decide the issue, however, because we conclude that, even assuming probable cause was lacking, the good faith exception applies.” The government was forthright in disclosing … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2: Where PC was a close question, the court instead decides GFE applies

E.D.Mich.: Def used two houses, and his drug operation was from one; the SW for the second was still valid under GFE despite lack of nexus

Defendant conducted a drug operation from what the court called the 1st Premises, and he lived in the 2nd Premises, apparently avoiding keeping any drugs there. When he went out to do a drug deal, he’d stop at the 1st … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def used two houses, and his drug operation was from one; the SW for the second was still valid under GFE despite lack of nexus

D.N.M.: Passenger’s conduct and answers during traffic stop provided RS

The passenger’s conduct here showed reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. United States v. Torres, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10590 (D. N.M. Jan. 23, 2019). The government obtained CSLI in 2015 for 57 days of defendants’ cell phones, and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Passenger’s conduct and answers during traffic stop provided RS

NE: GFE applied to CSLI obtained two years before Carpenter

Defendant’s CSLI was obtained two years before Carpenter with an order under the Stored Communications Act to connect him to a murder. Carpenter was decided while on appeal. The court follows every other case on the issue and applies the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on NE: GFE applied to CSLI obtained two years before Carpenter

E.D.Mich.: PC shown for records of the last number a murder victim called

Defendant’s cell phone number being the last number a murder victim called was at least a minimally sufficient basis for a search warrant for cell phone records to see who it was. It was also at least supported by the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC shown for records of the last number a murder victim called

CA6: Carpenter decided after notice of appeal didn’t apply to defendant

CSLI was admitted at trial without objection. Carpenter was decided after the notice of appeal. On plain error review, there is no error because the CSLI was lawfully obtained at the time and the good faith exception applies. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Carpenter decided after notice of appeal didn’t apply to defendant

CA6 sustains Playpen warrant under GFE

Playpen warrant was valid under good faith exception. United States v. Moorehead, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 639 (6th Cir. Jan. 9, 2019).* Defendant was not entitled to discovery of the exploit code used in the NIT warrant to locate him. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6 sustains Playpen warrant under GFE

D.Mass.: Part of CI’s criminal history wasn’t disclosed, but enough was; CI was corroborated, and there was PC

The affiant didn’t withhold enough of the CI’s criminal history to be misleading. Not all of it was disclosed, but enough was to show he was part of the criminal milieu. And even if the withholding was significant, there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Part of CI’s criminal history wasn’t disclosed, but enough was; CI was corroborated, and there was PC

D.V.I.: Court doubts legal authority for border searches from mainland to VI, but GFE applies

The court doubts the legal basis for customs searches of people traveling nonstop from the U.S. mainland to the Virgin Islands because there is no international travel. Reliance on the V.I. Code doesn’t provide any real help to the government. … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Court doubts legal authority for border searches from mainland to VI, but GFE applies

CA11: Questioning during stop exceeded Rodriguez, but it was before that, so GFE applies

The stop was reasonable, and the questioning of the motorist was valid at the time it happened (December 2013). Under Rodriguez, however, the stop was unlawfully extended. Under the good faith exception, the detention was still valid. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Questioning during stop exceeded Rodriguez, but it was before that, so GFE applies