CA2: Where PC was a close question, the court instead decides GFE applies

“The existence of probable cause in this case presents a close question. We need not decide the issue, however, because we conclude that, even assuming probable cause was lacking, the good faith exception applies.” The government was forthright in disclosing the omissions in its investigation. [The court talked about alleged staleness, but no case has ever found staleness in a child pornography case.] United States v. Boles, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504 (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2019).

The court held a Franks hearing over whether there were material misstatements in a Facebook warrant, and it concluded there were none. United States v. Liburd, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11850 (E.D. N.Y. Jan. 24, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.