Daily Archives: October 17, 2023

CO: REP in Google search history which also implicates freedom of expression

“First, the court concludes that, under the Colorado Constitution, the defendant has a constitutionally protected privacy interest in his Google search history even when revealed only in connection with his IP address and not his name and that, under both … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CO: REP in Google search history which also implicates freedom of expression

E.D.Tex.: Pretextual claim of emergency aid exception to conduct a drug search leads to suppression

Defendant was having a seizure in his underwear on the street, about two blocks from his home. Officers could tell the smell of PCP about him. Officers went to his house and the door was cracked. Looking through the door, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Pretext | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Pretextual claim of emergency aid exception to conduct a drug search leads to suppression

E.D.Wis: Faced with motion to suppress DNA evidence, govt can seek it again

The government obtained DNA and defendant moved to suppress. Then the government sought DNA by warrant again with a new warrant. It is permitted to do so. United States v. Watson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185148 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.Wis: Faced with motion to suppress DNA evidence, govt can seek it again

PA: State obligated to raise all possible issues in defense of warrantless search in trial court

The state is obliged to raise whatever issues it can in defense of a warrantless search at the hearing. Piecemeal litigation by motion to reconsider must be avoided. Commonwealth v. Smith, 2023 PA Super 205, 2023 Pa. Super. LEXIS 482 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Prison and jail searches, Staleness | Comments Off on PA: State obligated to raise all possible issues in defense of warrantless search in trial court