Monthly Archives: August 2020

OH3: Unsigned SW still entitled to GFE

Even though the search warrant wasn’t signed in violation of the state rule, the good faith exception applies because the issuing judge found probable cause and said he issued the warrant. State v. Harrison, 2020-Ohio-3920, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2821 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: Unsigned SW still entitled to GFE

Bloomberg Law: Protester Surveillance May Test Constitutional Privacy in Courts

Bloomberg Law: Protester Surveillance May Test Constitutional Privacy in Courts by Julia Weng & Daniel R. Stoller:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Protester Surveillance May Test Constitutional Privacy in Courts

CA11: A cell phone with 2kg of heroin and cash is PC for the phone

“[L]aw enforcement officers had probable cause to obtain a warrant to search the cell phone because it was found in a truck with two kilograms of heroin and $24,000 of loose currency during the investigation into the heroin-distribution conspiracy.” CoA … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA11: A cell phone with 2kg of heroin and cash is PC for the phone

CA6: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R is waiver of 4A claim

Defendant waived his Fourth Amendment challenge to his stop and frisk by not objecting to the USMJ’s R&R. United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24261 (6th Cir. July 31, 2020). Defendant doesn’t show any plausible basis for defense … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Failure to object to USMJ’s R&R is waiver of 4A claim

NV: Booking inventory invalid for lack of inventory and officer’s lack of memory of doing it

The booking inventory of defendant’s “bag” was invalid because of a lack of true inventory. The booking officer didn’t list what was in it because there was just too much stuff. Moreover, at the suppression hearing, she didn’t recall even … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on NV: Booking inventory invalid for lack of inventory and officer’s lack of memory of doing it

E.D.Wash.: Connecting seized cell phone to internet not a search

Connecting already seized cell phone to the internet was not shown to be a search (citing no law). United States v. Murray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136292 (E.D. Wash. July 2, 2020). 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Connecting seized cell phone to internet not a search

WaPo: Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you.

WaPo: Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you. by Harvey Rosenfield & Laura Antonini (“Operating in the shadows of the online marketplace, specialized tech companies you’ve likely never heard of are tapping vast … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you.

NY Times: Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried

NY Times: Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried by Heather Murphy (“Nearly two-thirds of GEDmatch’s users opt out of helping law enforcement. For a brief window this month, that didn’t matter.”):

Posted in DNA, Informational privacy | Comments Off on NY Times: Why a Data Breach at a Genealogy Site Has Privacy Experts Worried

CA7: Violation of police dept regulations can’t reasonably be a § 1983 claim or 4A violation

Violation of department violations can’t reasonably be a § 1983 claim or violation of the Fourth Amendment. Estate of Biegert v. Molitor, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 24211 (7th Cir. July 31, 2020):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: Violation of police dept regulations can’t reasonably be a § 1983 claim or 4A violation

IN: Def counsel’s not filing a motion to suppress was strategic for plea purposes, not because of conflict

Defendant claimed defense counsel had a conflict of interest in not filing a motion to suppress because counsel also represented defendant’s wife. Their interests were identical in the case. The decision not to pursue the motion was to secure a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Def counsel’s not filing a motion to suppress was strategic for plea purposes, not because of conflict