CA10: That search violated CO Const. was not an issue for federal court (on habeas)

Petitioner’s habeas argument that the search of his home violated the Colorado Constitution has nothing to do with a federal conviction where the search complied with the Fourth Amendment. In any event, he already lost on that issue in the direct appeal. Warren v. United States, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16171 (10th Cir. Aug. 24, 2017).*

There was no objective evidence or even subjective evidence that there was any reason to believe that there was an exigency for a warrantless entry. State v. Stanley, 287 Ore. App. 399, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1009 (Aug. 23, 2017).*

After defendant’s stop with reasonable suspicion, the smell of marijuana enabled the officer to go further. United States v. Gerald, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16190 (11th Cir. Aug. 24, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, State constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.