Daily Archives: November 9, 2016

TX14: Dashcam video didn’t support officer’s version and appellate court won’t reverse suppression order

The dashcam video doesn’t support the state’s contention defendant was weaving before the stop, and there is no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s findings suppressing the stop for a “welfare check” that led to a DUI arrest. State … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX14: Dashcam video didn’t support officer’s version and appellate court won’t reverse suppression order

CA8: Key fob in pocket, common today, is not RS def was driving a nearby stolen car

A key fob in one’s pocket, common today, is not reasonable suspicion defendant was driving a nearby stolen car. The seizure was suppressed. United States v. Craddock, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20118 (8th Cir. Nov. 8, 2016):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA8: Key fob in pocket, common today, is not RS def was driving a nearby stolen car

E.D.Wash.: Defending on lack of connection to property was best course; no IAC for lack of standing, and if motion made it would have lost on merits, too

Defendant’s counsel wasn’t ineffective: “This Court unequivocally finds that Defendant manifested a deliberate abandonment to any interest in his neighbor’s shed. Counsel was not ineffective by tactically defending the charge by highlighting the absence of positive evidence tying Defendant to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Defending on lack of connection to property was best course; no IAC for lack of standing, and if motion made it would have lost on merits, too

CADC: Bomb squad’s search hours later was not exigent and no QI

A top to bottom search of plaintiff’s home by the D.C. bomb squad hours into a “situation” at his home (actually based on a mistake) wasn’t remotely justified by exigent circumstances. Moreover, qualified immunity doesn’t apply (2-1 on this issue) … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Independent source | Comments Off on CADC: Bomb squad’s search hours later was not exigent and no QI

N.D.Iowa: Def’s GF who shared home who called police on him had apparent authority to consent

Defendant disavowed control over a bedroom in the single family home he lived in, and he had standing in the house as a whole and thus standing to challenge seizure of the gun found in that bedroom. The police here … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Def’s GF who shared home who called police on him had apparent authority to consent

S.D.Cal.: Admission of MJ in the trunk was PC; officer didn’t have to check on MMJ prescription

An admission defendant had marijuana in the trunk didn’t require the officer to check into whether defendant had a prescription for it. United States v. Robbins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153558 (S.D.Cal. Nov. 3, 2016). Defense counsel did, in fact, … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Admission of MJ in the trunk was PC; officer didn’t have to check on MMJ prescription

N.D.W.Va.: “Officers are not required to completely confirm reasonable suspicions before they may perform an investigative stop — only to possess a suspicion that is reasonable.”

“Defendant’s identity was not relevant to reasonable suspicion that he committed an assault, since the witnesses who reported the assault did not know his identity and therefore could not report it to Captain Root. Captain Root had only a physical … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: “Officers are not required to completely confirm reasonable suspicions before they may perform an investigative stop — only to possess a suspicion that is reasonable.”

S.D.Cal.: SW which was not overbroad merely by including a “tending to show” phrase

Scanning text messages on a cell phone at the border was reasonable. This wasn’t a full search, and this was just a “non-forensic scan” of the phone and not a “searching inquiry.” This led, however, to a search warrant which … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: SW which was not overbroad merely by including a “tending to show” phrase

D.N.M.: Def’s sister had keys to his storage units, and inquiry by the police led them to reasonably believe she had apparent authority

Defendant’s sister still had apparent authority to consent to search of his storage unit even though she didn’t know the access codes and she’d never been there. After inquiry by the police, it was reasonable for them to believe that … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s sister had keys to his storage units, and inquiry by the police led them to reasonably believe she had apparent authority