Daily Archives: January 10, 2016

CA6: SW for cell phone for video of def’s obstructing officer properly led to finding CP

Defendant was stopped by a police officer and became argumentative, and he refused to provide his license, insurance, and registration. He said he was attempting to record the officer on his cell phone but he was too busy with it … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: SW for cell phone for video of def’s obstructing officer properly led to finding CP

SD: A pipe with residue on the person is PC for an automobile exception search

The officer decided to stop defendant who was parked under a “no parking” sign. When he approached the vehicle, an open container was visible between the driver and passenger seats. It turned out defendant’s DL was revoked. While normally a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception | Comments Off on SD: A pipe with residue on the person is PC for an automobile exception search

ID: Officer stalled the stop to give drug dog time to arrive without RS

Defendant argued that his motion to suppress should have been granted because the officer slow walked the stop for 19 minutes without reasonable suspicion to give time for the drug dog to arrive. The trial court’s findings were not helpful … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Officer stalled the stop to give drug dog time to arrive without RS

NYTimes Editorial: Drone Regulations Should Focus on Safety and Privacy

NYTimes Editorial: Drone Regulations Should Focus on Safety and Privacy: Though it would have been inconceivable just a few years ago, among the most popular gifts this past holiday season was the drone. Increasingly coveted by hobbyists and businesses, these … Continue reading

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on NYTimes Editorial: Drone Regulations Should Focus on Safety and Privacy

OH10: “The Fourth Amendment exists to be enforced, which means providing a remedy.”

Defendant was a student in school, and his unattended bag was first cursorily searched to identify the owner. Then it was dumped out to search because he was suspected to be a gang member. The school resource officers were state … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on OH10: “The Fourth Amendment exists to be enforced, which means providing a remedy.”