Daily Archives: January 13, 2016

Just Security: Content Is Content, No Matter How Small

Just Security: Content Is Content, No Matter How Small by Jeffrey Vagle: Recently, Orin Kerr and I had a brief conversation on Twitter regarding the Fourth Amendment and the content/non-content distinction. Specifically, Orin asked those of us who subscribe to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Just Security: Content Is Content, No Matter How Small

CA11: Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law

Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law. Denial of qualified immunity denied. The officer’s subjective belief that force was necessary doesn’t carry any weight when … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law

CA5: Protective sweep generally can go between a mattress and box springs

It is not unreasonable for an officer to conclude generally that a protective sweep between a mattress and box springs is necessary. Here, there were factual indications that somebody else might be in the room further supporting it. [And plenty … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA5: Protective sweep generally can go between a mattress and box springs

MA: State const. gives probationers more rights than parolees; parolee house search may occur on RS

“We conclude that art. 14 offers greater protection to parolees than does the Fourth Amendment. Article 14 does not, however, offer as much protection to parolees as it affords to probationers. Therefore, where a parole officer has reasonable suspicion to … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: State const. gives probationers more rights than parolees; parolee house search may occur on RS

N.D.Cal.: Consent given after threat to search was involuntary where search would have violated Fourth Amendment

Defendant consented to a search of a his backpack after he was told it was going to be searched. The problem with the search was that the search would have violated the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the consent was invalid, as … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Consent given after threat to search was involuntary where search would have violated Fourth Amendment

N.D.Ga.: Forensic search of cell phone after SW’s expiration date not a constitutional violation here

Defendant was a Delta baggage employee accused of conspiring with others to ship firearms by air from Atlanta to NYC and bypassing TSA security. Search warrants were obtained for his cell phone and house. The forensic search of the cell … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Forensic search of cell phone after SW’s expiration date not a constitutional violation here