Daily Archives: January 1, 2016

D.Kan.: Govt failed to prove legal basis for impoundment and inventory

Defendant had standing in his father’s car that he let defendant drive. The inventory of the car and impoundment was not for a legitimate inventory purpose. It was impounded because another police department asked for it. “The government has failed … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Govt failed to prove legal basis for impoundment and inventory

IL: Refusal of consent to DNA or drug test admissible to show consciousness of guilt, analogizing DUI refusal

State’s argument that defendant refused to submit to a DNA and drug test was not irrelevant nor more prejudicial than relevant. The court analogizes its holdings on refusal in the face of implied consent laws in DUI cases as being … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on IL: Refusal of consent to DNA or drug test admissible to show consciousness of guilt, analogizing DUI refusal

S.D.Ind.: A car carrier is a bailee with the ability to consent to a search cars he is hauling

A car carrier as a bailee with exclusive control on a truck has the ability to consent to a search of a car he is hauling. (See the close case of United States v. Crowder, 588 F.3d 929 (7th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: A car carrier is a bailee with the ability to consent to a search cars he is hauling