Daily Archives: January 24, 2016

The Hill: 5 things to watch in Internet privacy fight

The Hill: 5 things to watch in Internet privacy fight By Mario Trujillo: Advocates are pressing the Federal Communications Commission to quickly propose strong Internet privacy rules, one of the unfinished parts of last year’s net neutrality order. The agency … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Hill: 5 things to watch in Internet privacy fight

MA Suffolk: Since state constitution protects CSLI, it also protects against gathering constant pinging info without probable cause for warrant

Since the SJC said in Commonwealth v. Augustine, 467 Mass. 230, 4 N.E.3d 846 (2014), that CSLI was protected under the state constitution, it must also apply to information about constant pinging which is even more intrusive. Commonwealth v. Jordan, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on MA Suffolk: Since state constitution protects CSLI, it also protects against gathering constant pinging info without probable cause for warrant

IL: When a vehicle is stopped because of a warrant on owner, even when discovered owner not driving, officer can ask for DL

Defendant’s van was pulled over because there was a warrant for the owner, a woman. The man driving could not be the owner, and the officer asked for his DL, which was permissible and lawfully incident to the stop under … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IL: When a vehicle is stopped because of a warrant on owner, even when discovered owner not driving, officer can ask for DL

CA11: After an illegal drug search, the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to a § 1983 case

Plaintiffs were the target of a search warrant of their property which got suppressed in Georgia state court. Then they sued the cops, and qualified immunity was denied. The cops appealed, and the exclusionary was held inapplicable to the civil … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA11: After an illegal drug search, the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to a § 1983 case

NC: RS came from hand-to-hand transaction observed by one of officer’s CIs

The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant after an apparent hand-to-hand transaction where the officer recognized him as one of his former CIs who bought drugs for him. State v. Travis, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 105 (Jan. 19, 2016). … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: RS came from hand-to-hand transaction observed by one of officer’s CIs

CA10: Def consented to a car search, and he took up offer to sit in patrol car; that with passenger’s suspicious conduct and high crime area justified frisk finding gun

Defendant consented to a search of his car during a traffic stop, and defendant took a deputy up on an offer to sit inside the patrol vehicle during the search. That led to a frisk because the officer would have … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Def consented to a car search, and he took up offer to sit in patrol car; that with passenger’s suspicious conduct and high crime area justified frisk finding gun