Daily Archives: June 4, 2015

OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

On remand from the Supreme Court, the state asserted an argument never made in the trial court, and it’s treated as waived since there was no factual development. The prior decision is adhered to. State v. Heater, 271 Or. App. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: State could not raise new argument in CoA after remand never developed in trial court

M.D.Pa.: “Stalking horse” theory of police involvement in probation searches is apparently no longer valid

The “stalking horse” theory of police involvement in probation searches is apparently no longer valid. United States v. Flowers, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71673 (M.D.Pa. May 14, 2015):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: “Stalking horse” theory of police involvement in probation searches is apparently no longer valid

AZ: 911 hang up call justified entry onto curtilage and look in windows when no one answered door

Police received a 911 hang up call, and the call back was unanswered. They are treated as emergencies, and two officers responded. No one answered the door, so they went to a window to look in, and a marijuana plant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Protective sweep | Comments Off on AZ: 911 hang up call justified entry onto curtilage and look in windows when no one answered door

CA3: Social guest without belongings on premises for day lacked standing; leaving open standing question for better facts later

Defendant was on the premises of another when the search occurred, but he was a social guest at the moment, and not an overnight guest with stuff there. The case law grants higher standing to an overnight guest. While it … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Social guest without belongings on premises for day lacked standing; leaving open standing question for better facts later

N.D.Ga.: Def’s failure to respond to gov’t’s questioning his standing was waiver

Defendant has the burden of establishing standing. At the hearing, the government contested standing, and defendant didn’t respond or brief it. Therefore, standing was waived. United States v. Tolbert, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71047 (N.D.Ga. April 30, 2015).* Probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def’s failure to respond to gov’t’s questioning his standing was waiver