Daily Archives: June 18, 2015

The Guardian: Congress warned that drones present ‘a nightmare scenario for civil liberties’

The Guardian: Congress warned that drones present ‘a nightmare scenario for civil liberties’ House committee considering future of US airspace worries about unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) filming football games but silent on law enforcement use

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on The Guardian: Congress warned that drones present ‘a nightmare scenario for civil liberties’

M.D.Fla.: Def lacked standing in any event, so whether defense counsel was ineffective for not calling him as witness at suppression hearing is moot

2255 petitioner had no standing, even on his own allegations, so whether defense counsel was ineffective for not calling him to testify to standing was moot. “Because the Court finds that Campbell’s underlying claim to have had a reasonable expectation … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Def lacked standing in any event, so whether defense counsel was ineffective for not calling him as witness at suppression hearing is moot

IL: Mere “acceptance” of a package for an anticipatory warrant is overbroad

This anticipatory warrant’s triggering condition was “accept[ance]” of a package, not opening it although there were devices on it to tell the police that, too. Mere acceptance of the package makes it overbroad and vests too much discretion in the … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Overbreadth | Comments Off on IL: Mere “acceptance” of a package for an anticipatory warrant is overbroad

CA2: Innocent 9/11 detainees arrested in 2002 stated a claim for relief for conditions of confinement in federal detention

After 9/11, 762 people were detained, some without the slightest probable cause. This case arose in 2002 after these plaintiffs were detained, held for months, sometimes in conditions sounding like they were war criminals, and later released. It’s a really … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA2: Innocent 9/11 detainees arrested in 2002 stated a claim for relief for conditions of confinement in federal detention

CA6: “[I]t is objectively unreasonable to frame an inmate” for a crime he didn’t commit

Plaintiff alleged an Art. III “injury in fact” in his claim that he was framed for a crime he didn’t commit. “Because it is objectively unreasonable to frame an inmate, we reverse the district court’s judgment and hold that Price … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA6: “[I]t is objectively unreasonable to frame an inmate” for a crime he didn’t commit

CA9: Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the AEDPA

Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the habeas limitations of AEDPA. Newman v. Wengler, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10094 (9th Cir. June 16, 2015). [This may be the only case to ever … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA9: Stone v. Powell bar and the full and fair litigation requirement survived adoption of the AEDPA