Daily Archives: June 1, 2015

Foreign Policy: Forget the Patriot Act – Here Are the Privacy Violations You Should Be Worried About

Foreign Policy: Forget the Patriot Act – Here Are the Privacy Violations You Should Be Worried About by Stephen Vladeck America hasn’t even begun to have a meaningful debate about curtailing the government’s right to spy on citizens.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Foreign Policy: Forget the Patriot Act – Here Are the Privacy Violations You Should Be Worried About

NYTimes: Key Parts of Patriot Act Expire Temporarily as Senate Moves Toward Limits on Spying

NYTimes: Key Parts of Patriot Act Expire Temporarily as Senate Moves Toward Limits on Spying by Jennifer Steinhauer & Jonathan Weisman: WASHINGTON — The government’s authority to sweep up vast quantities of phone records in the hunt for terrorists expired … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on NYTimes: Key Parts of Patriot Act Expire Temporarily as Senate Moves Toward Limits on Spying

WaPo: Sun sets on some NSA surveillance powers as Rand Paul foils extension

WaPo: Sun sets on some NSA surveillance powers as Rand Paul foils extension by Mike DeBonis & Ellen Nakashima: The legal authority for several national security programs expired at midnight Sunday and will not be renewed for at least two … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on WaPo: Sun sets on some NSA surveillance powers as Rand Paul foils extension

W.D.Pa.: Distancing oneself from ownership and control over the vehicle searched “effectively has eviscerated his ability to challenge the warrantless search of it.”

Defendant’s distancing himself from ownership and control of the vehicle searched by the government “effectively has eviscerated his ability to challenge the warrantless search of it.” He has no standing to suppress what his wife had. United States v. King, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Distancing oneself from ownership and control over the vehicle searched “effectively has eviscerated his ability to challenge the warrantless search of it.”

W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

Defendant’s 12 cell phones could be seized as instrumentalities of a drug crime under a search warrant. Calling a number the officers obtained during a wiretap to identify a phone was not an illegal search. Turning on the phones just … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A cell phone is an “instrumentality” of a drug crime; turning on a cell phone to see if it answers is not a “search”

IL: “Officer safety” here didn’t justify a search because of an alleged “furtive gesture” where defendant was quiet and compliant

Not every movement in a car is a “furtive gesture.” The defendant was quiet and compliant before the officer decided to search the back seat area for “officer safety” solely because defendant reached that way. No other reason for a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IL: “Officer safety” here didn’t justify a search because of an alleged “furtive gesture” where defendant was quiet and compliant

NY1: Voluntariness shown by experience with criminal justice system and advice of right to refuse; handcuffs removed before consent granted

“Defendant, who had prior contacts with the criminal justice system, provided his consent to search both orally and in writing, and he acknowledged that he had been notified of his right to refuse consent …. Although a large number of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NY1: Voluntariness shown by experience with criminal justice system and advice of right to refuse; handcuffs removed before consent granted