Category Archives: Staleness

NC: “Thursday” in a SW affidavit means the previous Thursday, and the search warrant wasn’t stale when issued

This case started with an anonymous letter about alleged drug sales at defendant’s residence. A trash pull was conducted on “Thursday.” Read in context, that means the previous Thursday, and the search warrant wasn’t stale when issued. State v. Teague, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on NC: “Thursday” in a SW affidavit means the previous Thursday, and the search warrant wasn’t stale when issued

IL: PC existed ten days after a crime to seek the weapon involved in the crime

There was probable cause for a search warrant for defendant’s house for a firearm involved in a crime ten days after the crime. Firearms are possessions usually kept. People v. Rodriguez, 2018 IL App (1st) 141379-B, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on IL: PC existed ten days after a crime to seek the weapon involved in the crime

S.D.W.Va.: Def’s admissions on body camera duffle bag wasn’t his denies him standing

“The body camera recording clearly shows that Defendant denied any ownership interest in the duffel bag at the time of the stop. As such, the Court finds that Defendant voluntarily abandoned the duffel bag and therefore lost any reasonable expectation … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Def’s admissions on body camera duffle bag wasn’t his denies him standing

PA: Date typo in affidavit for SW could be corrected in context of totality

A typographical error in a date of an occurence in the affidavit for search warrant for the year (2013 instead of 2014) could be overlooked in context of the affidavit as a whole which showed it a mere typo. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on PA: Date typo in affidavit for SW could be corrected in context of totality

E.D.Mich.: Def’s disclaiming ownership of cell phone when seized is a lack of standing, even when he claimed it after it rang

Defendant had no standing to challenge a search of a cell phone found in his car that he said belonged to his girlfriend. “Jackson does not deny that he disclaimed ownership of the phone at the time it was seized. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s disclaiming ownership of cell phone when seized is a lack of standing, even when he claimed it after it rang

D.N.J.: Previous finding of good faith applies to later Franks challenge

Defendant had already filed a suppression motion and lost on good faith. Now he files a motion based on Franks that statements of witnesses in quote marks weren’t accurate. The previous finding of good faith carries over to here, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Previous finding of good faith applies to later Franks challenge

CA11: While time wasn’t clearly stated, it was inferred on the totality; therefore, not stale

While the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t clearly specify a time frame, it was inferred, and it was clearly reasonable to conclude on the totality that the defendant would still have the sought after images on his computer. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on CA11: While time wasn’t clearly stated, it was inferred on the totality; therefore, not stale

UT: While the CI’s stories alone were weak, police corroborated them

The two CI’s stories were weak in themselves, but the police succeeded in corroborating enough to rise to probable cause. State v. Matheson, 2018 Utah App. LEXIS 66 (Apr. 13, 2018).* Hitting the lane dividing line was justification for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on UT: While the CI’s stories alone were weak, police corroborated them

N.D.Ohio: There was a fair inference business records would be at def’s house

When a white collar investigation is underway, the staleness inquiry is more flexible because records, as opposed to drugs, are regularly kept for a long time. It was reasonable here to conclude that business records would be found at defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: There was a fair inference business records would be at def’s house

OH7: 23 days isn’t stale in a SW for guns

The police were in defendant’s house and observed guns. They didn’t realize that he was a felon in possession until two weeks later. Then they sought a warrant 23 days after seeing the guns. That wasn’t unreasonable considering the fact … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Staleness | Comments Off on OH7: 23 days isn’t stale in a SW for guns

D.Minn.: Older information about drugs confirmed by an ion scan of door knob 72 hours before SW not stale

Officers received detailed information in May 2017 of several being involved in the drug trade in April 2017. This resulted in a search warrant of others. Another CI provided information about June 2017. “In addition to Defendant being seen in … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Older information about drugs confirmed by an ion scan of door knob 72 hours before SW not stale

GA: Def failed to show standing in apt he was arrested in in early morning hours

Being arrested in an apartment that’s not yours doesn’t confer standing without some proof of a relationship to the property. The evidence at the suppression hearing did not address defendant’s status relative to the apartment; i.e., whether he was the … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Def failed to show standing in apt he was arrested in in early morning hours

S.D.W.Va.: SW for apartment five days after car was found nearby with PC inside it wasn’t stale

Defendant stopped at a DUI checkpoint, officers could see marijuana through the window, and then defendant fled the checkpoint. Officers gave chase. They found the car at an apartment complex, seemingly abandoned, parked with the door open and engine running. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: SW for apartment five days after car was found nearby with PC inside it wasn’t stale

CA6: SW for house where CP was created and sex trafficking occurred wasn’t stale after two months

Defendant was convicted of creating child pornography and sex trafficking minors. The search warrant was issued two months after the last act, but the list of acts (photography of CP; beatings) that occurred in defendant’s residence and the things sought … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: SW for house where CP was created and sex trafficking occurred wasn’t stale after two months

D.Mont.: Gun possession not stale after 5 months

A CI’s reference to guns in defendant’s house in Dec. 2016 was not stale by April 2017. Defendant’s arguments about a Franks violation are rejected for lack of materiality to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Wilson, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Gun possession not stale after 5 months

N.D.Ga.: Six month old information in gun sale case wasn’t stale

Defendant was alleged to have sold quantities of firearms more than once. Six month old information in a gun sale case was not stale. United States v. Fisher-Bland, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199259 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Six month old information in gun sale case wasn’t stale

OH3: PC for anticipatory SW exists here merely because drug traffickers commonly use their home to store drugs

The trial court did not err by denying the motion to suppress because the issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause for an anticipatory search warrant existed. Evidence of drug trafficking, without more, furnished probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Staleness | Comments Off on OH3: PC for anticipatory SW exists here merely because drug traffickers commonly use their home to store drugs

OH11: Admin SW for hoarding was issued with PC and wasn’t stale

Defendant here was referred to as “having a hoarding issue” because of a growing collection of junk in his yard and up against his house that was flammable and attractive to rodents. He was prosecuted for the exterior junk and … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH11: Admin SW for hoarding was issued with PC and wasn’t stale

D.Kan.: CP SW not stale [are they ever?]

The search warrant for child pornography was not stale, based on the officer’s experience. [Since no case has ever found staleness in child pornography cases, why don’t they just cut to the chase and take judicial notice?] United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: CP SW not stale [are they ever?]

PA: SW for firearm in defendant’s home was stale 15 months after the murder (but harmless)

A search warrant for a murder weapon in defendant’s house was stale when it was issued 15 months after the murder. It was, however, harmless error in this case. Commonwealth v. Jacoby, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 2274 (Sept. 28, 2017) (separate … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on PA: SW for firearm in defendant’s home was stale 15 months after the murder (but harmless)