Category Archives: Franks doctrine

S.D.W.Va.: Officers falsely swore def’s friend “lived or stayed there”; she visited after a small heroin deal, and there was no PC at all

Defendant was visited by a friend after an $80 heroin sale. There was no nexus to defendant’s house by the friend who’d only visited a few times over a long period of time. The police also falsely swore that she … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Officers falsely swore def’s friend “lived or stayed there”; she visited after a small heroin deal, and there was no PC at all

M.D.Tenn.: Getting new evidence, def succeeds in a Franks challenge after initial denial of his motion to suppress

On a motion to reconsider denial of a suppression motion with new evidence, defendant succeeds on a Franks challenge. [The court initially had concerns about officer credibility, and this cinches it.] United States v. Anderson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29539 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Getting new evidence, def succeeds in a Franks challenge after initial denial of his motion to suppress

NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

No Fourth Amendment right of defendant was violated by recording his prison calls and then admitting them into evidence. He was well on notice that they were recorded. People v. Diaz, 2019 NY Slip Op 01260, 2019 N.Y. LEXIS 266 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

CA11: § 1983 malicious prosecution claim defeated by PC even though exonerating information omitted from arrest affidavit

Plaintiff police officers’ false arrest claim fails on qualified immunity. Even though allegedly exonerating information was omitted from the arrest affidavits, and the criminal case was dropped by the state’s attorney, it wasn’t enough to undermine the probable cause that … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: § 1983 malicious prosecution claim defeated by PC even though exonerating information omitted from arrest affidavit

M.D.Fla.: No showing of RS for protective sweep on entry; observations in other rooms suppressed

The protective sweep of other rooms had no reasonable suspicion justification under Buie that another person might be present. There were two and they were unreasonable. The product of the walk through made it into a search warrant for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: No showing of RS for protective sweep on entry; observations in other rooms suppressed

D.Nev.: DNA match overcame alleged Franks violation

The court finds that a minimal showing of at least recklessness was made in a representation in the search warrant application that a black cloth had not been disturbed during a crime. The video surveillance shows several people did. On … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: DNA match overcame alleged Franks violation

GA: Motion for a Franks hearing on arrest warrant mooted by indictment

Defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing on his arrest warrant was mooted by his indictment. Young v. State, 2019 Ga. LEXIS 55 (Feb. 4, 2019). Defendant was a sheriff’s deputy, and he was suspected of sexual misconduct with a minor. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on GA: Motion for a Franks hearing on arrest warrant mooted by indictment

N.D.Tex.: Pet’r raised his 4A claim at every level in state court, and that forecloses habeas relief on the merits

Petitioner raised in his 2254 a lack of probable cause for the search warrant. “Petitioner raised this Fourth Amendment claim in the trial court, on direct appeal, and in his state habeas petition. He has failed to show he did … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Pet’r raised his 4A claim at every level in state court, and that forecloses habeas relief on the merits

N.D.Ala.: No Franks proffer so motion fails

“In this case, the defendant has not attempted to make any preliminary showing that the information contained in the application/affidavit was knowingly or recklessly false. The closest he comes to doing so is the assertion that the application/affidavit avers that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: No Franks proffer so motion fails

PA: There’s no right to a warning before fleeing from the police during a stop

Defendant had no right to a warning before he fled from police when he was stopped. “Here, as a practical matter, it is not all clear that police had a reasonable opportunity to issue Dunham verbal commands directing his movement. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on PA: There’s no right to a warning before fleeing from the police during a stop

D.Minn.: Def’s Franks challenge had no offer of proof and thus was a mere complaint without support

Defendant’s Franks challenge to the search warrant wasn’t specific and was actually a mere “complain[t]” without an offer of proof, and that’s just not enough. United States v. Yackel, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12819 (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2019)*:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def’s Franks challenge had no offer of proof and thus was a mere complaint without support

E.D.Ky.: Disagreement with some of the facts of the alleged PC doesn’t undermine it; it might be relevant at trial

Defendant’s disagreement with some of the facts that led to his arrest didn’t undermine the probable cause and search incident. They may be relevant at trial, but probable cause still exists. United States v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12033 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Disagreement with some of the facts of the alleged PC doesn’t undermine it; it might be relevant at trial

CA2: Where PC was a close question, the court instead decides GFE applies

“The existence of probable cause in this case presents a close question. We need not decide the issue, however, because we conclude that, even assuming probable cause was lacking, the good faith exception applies.” The government was forthright in disclosing … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2: Where PC was a close question, the court instead decides GFE applies

CA10: District court was within its discretion to limit cross as to extraneous matters in SW affidavit at suppression hearing in light of issues

In light of the controlled buy that formed the basis for the search warrant here, the district court acted within its discretion in limiting broad cross-examination of the officer about what it found were extraneous matters in the affidavit. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA10: District court was within its discretion to limit cross as to extraneous matters in SW affidavit at suppression hearing in light of issues

N.D.Ind.: Mistake as to address for SW was precipitated by def and doesn’t implicate Franks

Mistake as to address (Green v. Gretna) was precipitated by defendant having given a Green Street address during a prior stop. There’s no showing of a deliberate or even reckless falsehood by the officer in getting the state search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Mistake as to address for SW was precipitated by def and doesn’t implicate Franks

CA7: Franks is settled law, and false statements to procure arrest warrant denied qualified immunity

Plaintiff stated a Franks claim that his arrest warrant was based on false evidence and omitted exculpatory evidence. The officer is denied qualified immunity. Rainsberger v. Benner, 17 2521 (7th Cir. Jan. 15, 2019):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Franks is settled law, and false statements to procure arrest warrant denied qualified immunity

CA6: One doesn’t get a Franks hearing without a proper showing; it’s not the way to test the argument

Defendant’s Franks argument in the district court didn’t argue that probable cause would be lacking. The search warrant affidavit as a whole shows probable cause. “On appeal, Fuller does not contend that he made the requisite ‘substantial preliminary showing,’” and … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: One doesn’t get a Franks hearing without a proper showing; it’s not the way to test the argument

D.Nev.: CI’s alleged (and unsupported) false statement isn’t a Franks violation; has to be the affiant’s

Defendant claims a Franks violation because the CI is believed to be Rudnick, and Rudnick has credibility problems. Defendant doesn’t allege what is false to even get a hearing. Besides, Rudnick is the CI and not the affiant. Denied. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Nev.: CI’s alleged (and unsupported) false statement isn’t a Franks violation; has to be the affiant’s

ID: Def counsel’s refusal to say officers attempted to mislead the issuing magistrate was fatal to Franks claim

Defendant entered the Pocatello federal courthouse with a backpack. The x-ray scanner revealed a meth pipe, and the local police were called. After police searched the backpack and found meth, they went to defendant’s pickup truck, placed the backpack in … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: Def counsel’s refusal to say officers attempted to mislead the issuing magistrate was fatal to Franks claim

OR: Using cell phone while driving is PC for a stop

Pushing buttons on a cell phone while driving was probable cause for a stop. State v. Pham, 295 Ore. App. 322, 2018 Ore. App. LEXIS 1572 (Dec. 14, 2018).* Defendant questions a representation of the officer in the probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Using cell phone while driving is PC for a stop