Category Archives: Curtilage

D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

The search of defendant’s car ostensibly under the automobile exception fails under Collins v. Virginia. It was clearly on the curtilage, and the exclusionary rule is applied. United States v. Bautista, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197792 (D. Ariz. Nov. 20, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

FL1: Def’s car search outside his chain link fence was outside the curtilage

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, but he made it to his mobile home and parked outside the chain link fence. The court finds the car was outside the curtilage under Dunn when the stop and dog sniff occurred. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL1: Def’s car search outside his chain link fence was outside the curtilage

IL: Dog sniff at motel room door violates 4A

A 2014 dog sniff at a motel room door violates the Fourth Amendment, and a reasonably well-trained officer in Illinois would know that. Suppressed. People v. Lindsey, 2018 IL App (3d) 150877, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 807 (Oct. 30, 2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL: Dog sniff at motel room door violates 4A

AZ: Opaque fence, no trespassing signs, and security cameras might bar entry to curtilage; remanded for more findings

Defendant had an opaque privacy fence and allegedly had no trespassing signs. His mailbox was outside the fence and there were security cameras. The officer passed both to come to the door to knock, and then he could smell marijuana. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AZ: Opaque fence, no trespassing signs, and security cameras might bar entry to curtilage; remanded for more findings

IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door

IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door because an apartment is still a “house” under the Fourth Amendment, and a different rule is unfair. An apartment dweller’s curtilage is his or her … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff | Comments Off on IL refuses to differentiate between homes and apartment buildings for dog sniffs at the door

NC: Officers doing a knock-and-talk didn’t unreasonably “linger” in violation of Jardines

Officers could enter defendant’s driveway to conduct a knock-and-talk, and they didn’t “linger” long in violation of Jardines. They smelled marijuana coming from the garage, and that was sufficient to get a search warrant. Defendant’s argument about the sign on … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on NC: Officers doing a knock-and-talk didn’t unreasonably “linger” in violation of Jardines

CA6: Officer spent 90 minutes at plaintiff’s house on the curtilage trying to get him to come out for a probation breath test; that violated 4A but officer gets QI

Plaintiff is a probationer who had a police officer show at his house to get a breath sample per his probation conditions. Despite repeated knocking and use of the police car’s PA system, plaintiff didn’t come to the door and … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer spent 90 minutes at plaintiff’s house on the curtilage trying to get him to come out for a probation breath test; that violated 4A but officer gets QI

PA: The automobile exception doesn’t apply in def’s own driveway; PA SCt held that before Collins

The police had a defective search warrant to bring them to defendant’s house to search the car in the driveway. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held the year before Collins v. Virginia that the automobile exception didn’t apply in one’s driveway, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on PA: The automobile exception doesn’t apply in def’s own driveway; PA SCt held that before Collins

D.S.D.: Reasonable to stop car driving off rural property as police arrive to execute a SW

Officers arrived with a search warrant for a house on rural property, and a vehicle was leaving. It was reasonable to stop the vehicle to determine whether it or an occupant belonged at the house and was covered by the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Reasonable to stop car driving off rural property as police arrive to execute a SW

NC: Car parked on street was not on the curtilage

A car parked on the street next to a house was not on the curtilage as a matter of law. Based on undisputed facts in the record, however, the officer had probable cause to search the car on the street. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NC: Car parked on street was not on the curtilage

CA6: SWAT team surrounding a house for a knock-and-talk violates 4A

Sending the SWAT team to surround a house for a knock-and-talk violated the Fourth Amendment. Having officers in the backyard for officer safety may serve that function, but it’s still a violation of the curtilage under the Fourth Amendment. There … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: SWAT team surrounding a house for a knock-and-talk violates 4A

CA7: Pre-Carpenter CSLI was valid in good faith reliance on SCA (Davis not cited)

Defendant’s pre-Carpenter CSLI gathering was challenged under the theory that the SCA statute was unconstitutional. It was done in good faith reliance on the statute under Krull v. Illinois, and there would be no exclusion. (Davis good faith is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Curtilage, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA7: Pre-Carpenter CSLI was valid in good faith reliance on SCA (Davis not cited)

MN: Apt building common hallway not curtilage under Jardines for dog sniff

Dog sniff in the common hallway of an apartment building wasn’t unreasonable because it’s not curtilage under Jardines. State v. Edstrom, 2018 Minn. LEXIS 446 (Aug. 15, 2018). There was nexus: “Here, the investigating officer had significant experience. The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Nexus | Comments Off on MN: Apt building common hallway not curtilage under Jardines for dog sniff

FL2: Car outside motel room can’t be searched under SW for room; it’s not “curtilage”

Police surveilled three motel rooms for drug activity, and finally they procured a search warrant for the three rooms. They also searched the cars associated with those rooms under the theory the cars were within the curtilage of the motel … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL2: Car outside motel room can’t be searched under SW for room; it’s not “curtilage”

M.D.Ala.: Def’s 13 year old child could consent to entry, but not to search of house

ICE surveillance on defendant’s road into his property was not on the curtilage because it went to parts of defendant’s rural property other than the home. “Just as with the barn in Dunn, there is ample evidence that the road … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Curtilage | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Def’s 13 year old child could consent to entry, but not to search of house

GA: In responding to 911 call of a loud party where homeowners weren’t present, entry into backyard violated curtilage

Police received a report of a party going on at a house, and they walked to the back of the house where it was. There were many people on a deck, and they suspected from a radio call that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on GA: In responding to 911 call of a loud party where homeowners weren’t present, entry into backyard violated curtilage

N.D.Ill.: Collins v. Virginia doesn’t apply to a shared parking area which is not curtilage

Collins v. Virginia does not apply to shared parking areas which are not curtilage. “United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16409 (2d Cir. June 19, 2018), Jones’s vehicle was parked in a parking lot behind the multi-family building … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Collins v. Virginia doesn’t apply to a shared parking area which is not curtilage

Reason.com: Volokh Conspiracy: Collins v. Virginia and “the Conception Defining the Curtilage”

Reason.com: Volokh Conspiracy: Collins v. Virginia and “the Conception Defining the Curtilage” by Orin Kerr: A familiar idea “easily understood from our daily experience” — or is it?

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage | Comments Off on Reason.com: Volokh Conspiracy: Collins v. Virginia and “the Conception Defining the Curtilage”

SCOTUS: “The automobile exception does not permit the warrantless entry of a home or its curtilage in order to search a vehicle therein.”

The power of curtilage: Collins v. Virginia, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3210 (May 29, 2018) (8-1, Alito dissenting):

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Uncategorized | Comments Off on SCOTUS: “The automobile exception does not permit the warrantless entry of a home or its curtilage in order to search a vehicle therein.”

TN: Entry onto curtilage for trash pull violated 4A

Officers violated the curtilage by entering defendant’s property to do a trash pull. Removing that information from the affidavit for the search warrant leaves it without probable cause. The CI information that started the investigation alone isn’t enough to show … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on TN: Entry onto curtilage for trash pull violated 4A