Category Archives: Warrant execution

EFF: Secret Court Orders Aren’t Blank Checks for General Electronic Searches

EFF: Secret Court Orders Aren’t Blank Checks for General Electronic Searches by Mark Rumhold:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on EFF: Secret Court Orders Aren’t Blank Checks for General Electronic Searches

D.Colo.: GPS tracking a car after it had been sold by target was unreasonable

Defendant bought a car that had a GPS device placed by the police with a 60 day tracking warrant. He paid for it for his girlfriend, with whom he had a child, and he drove it at the time of … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Colo.: GPS tracking a car after it had been sold by target was unreasonable

CA10: GFE saves general warrant where affidavit specific and affiant served the warrant

Where officers obtained a warrant and searched two cell phones seized at the time of defendant’s arrest, the search warrant was invalid because it did not satisfy the particularity requirement since it did not identify either of the phones that … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: GFE saves general warrant where affidavit specific and affiant served the warrant

OH7: The SW included def’s car, and her driving off before police could search it didn’t prevent stopping and searching it away from the house

The search warrant for defendant’s house included her car. When he arrived there, the police attempted to stop her to search the car, but she got away and was stopped about a mile away. Because the warrant provided for the … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH7: The SW included def’s car, and her driving off before police could search it didn’t prevent stopping and searching it away from the house

E.D.Pa.: Seizure of years of emails by SW for later discriminating search was still reasonable

This email search warrant sought specific information over a several year period, and the Google production was somewhat limited yet still substantial. Yet, included were emails between attorney and client and there were no search protocols. The court declines to … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Seizure of years of emails by SW for later discriminating search was still reasonable

IN: Tossing flash bang into room with only a 9 month old baby in a playpen during drug raid was excessive under the circumstances; suppressed

Using a flash bang device during a SWAT drug raid that went off in a room with only a nine-month old baby in a playpen violated the state constitution for its overall unreasonableness. Watkins v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Tossing flash bang into room with only a 9 month old baby in a playpen during drug raid was excessive under the circumstances; suppressed

S.D.N.Y.: Failure to follow a document search protocol in otherwise reasonably conducted computer and device searches wasn’t unreasonable under 4A

The court conducts a second hearing over whether blanket suppression is required for over searching numerous electronic devices seized from the defendant, some of which were later turned over by defense counsel. Defendant sought to bring his case within “United … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overseizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Failure to follow a document search protocol in otherwise reasonably conducted computer and device searches wasn’t unreasonable under 4A

M.D.Pa.: Def can have limited discovery about the search but not a prior draft of the affidavit

Defendant’s discovery request relating to the execution of search warrants on his property is granted in part and denied in part. Essentially, he gets that which is really relevant like a video of execution of the warrant, chain of custody … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def can have limited discovery about the search but not a prior draft of the affidavit

OH10: E-mail SW was not overbroad considering it sought evidence of solicitation of minors and the actual execution was limited

The e-mail search warrant in this case authorized the search of “any and all” e-mails. It was reasonable for the issuing magistrate to conclude that e-mails in the e-mail account predating the exchanges between a person answering an advertisement for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, E-mail, Overbreadth, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH10: E-mail SW was not overbroad considering it sought evidence of solicitation of minors and the actual execution was limited

TN: SW with the wrong name once after the correct name appeared several times was not invalid

In a search warrant that included the defendant’s name repeatedly and then mistakenly included another name on the computer printed search warrant, common sense dictates that the warrant was directed at her. State v. Szabo, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: SW with the wrong name once after the correct name appeared several times was not invalid

D.N.M.: CA10 recognizes blanket suppression for a “general search,” but this doesn’t measure up; “excessive photographing” not violation of 4A

Defendant doesn’t adequately explain why complete suppression is required for the search being allegedly excessive. It is a remedy under United States v. Medlin, 842 F.2d 1194 (10th Cir. 1988), when the officers’ search is overly excessive, but this just … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.N.M.: CA10 recognizes blanket suppression for a “general search,” but this doesn’t measure up; “excessive photographing” not violation of 4A

WaPo: The Watch: For nine years, DEA withholds names of masked agents who violently raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs

WaPo: The Watch: For nine years, DEA withholds names of masked agents who violently raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs. by Radley Balko: The Burley sisters say they were raided, roughed up and verbally abused, but because they can’t … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: The Watch: For nine years, DEA withholds names of masked agents who violently raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs

CADC: Executing daytime warrant at night was unreasonable and a violation of the 4A

Executing a daytime warrant at night violated clearly established law and was unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Jones v. Kirchner, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15759 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 26, 2016). This warrant provided: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CADC: Executing daytime warrant at night was unreasonable and a violation of the 4A

W.D.Va.: If SW includes marital privileged material, that’s for filter team, not motion to quash

The search warrant target moved to quash based on marital privilege. Under federal law, the privilege is based on common law and presumed. The affidavit for the search warrant, however, shows probable cause for witness tampering. Resolution of the marital … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: If SW includes marital privileged material, that’s for filter team, not motion to quash

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: After police raided an apartment building to arrest a suspect, others were left with the collateral damage

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: After police raided an apartment building to arrest a suspect, others were left with the collateral damage by Koran Addo: The aftermath of the standoff highlights a murky legal area where in some places law enforcement covers … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on St. Louis Post-Dispatch: After police raided an apartment building to arrest a suspect, others were left with the collateral damage

TN: Omitting one item from inventory on the SW return wasn’t a constitutional violation

One bullet was missing from the return on the warrant which wasn’t discovered until the defense brought it up at the suppression hearing, so the state amended the return. This isn’t a prejudicial error to void the search or keep … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: Omitting one item from inventory on the SW return wasn’t a constitutional violation

NV: Sealing affidavit without explanation or timely providing inventory not ground to suppress

The state showed reason to seal the affidavit for the search warrant in this murder case at the time of issuance, and the threshold isn’t high. [The court chides the defense for not citing law in support, then fails to … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NV: Sealing affidavit without explanation or timely providing inventory not ground to suppress

IN: Walking into a house during a drug raid justifies a frisk

Defendant drove up to a house in the process of a drug raid. Eight people were in custody. Defendant was stopped when he got to the door, and he was frisked and a gun was found. The search was valid … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Walking into a house during a drug raid justifies a frisk

AL SWs must be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed

Search warrants in Alabama have to be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed. Here, the warrant was to the Sheriff of Mobile County, but an officer of the Mobile PD executed it. This was invalid execution. … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL SWs must be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed

CA10: Wrong address in SW didn’t invalidate it where the right place was well described and correctly found

The wrong address did not invalidate the warrant where the right place was well described and correctly found. Goss v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7735 (10th Cir. April 26, 2016):

Posted in Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA10: Wrong address in SW didn’t invalidate it where the right place was well described and correctly found