Daily Archives: May 11, 2025

AK: No PC shown for cell phone search in a Medicaid fraud case

In a Medicaid fraud case, the state did not show probable cause to believe evidence would be found on the cell phone of the Medicaid provider. The search warrant was also not particular for the cell phone. The warrant authorized … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on AK: No PC shown for cell phone search in a Medicaid fraud case

MI: Exigency for seeking cell phone consent doesn’t require actual knowledge def might destroy evidence on it

Defendant consented to seizure of his cell phone after officers learned there might be child sexual abuse material on it. A search warrant later issued. All this was reasonable. The officer doesn’t have to have evidence that defendant might delete … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Exigency for seeking cell phone consent doesn’t require actual knowledge def might destroy evidence on it

W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

An anonymous tip “here predicted Dodd would engage in future criminal activity and the tipster explained how they knew this information. Bullard then investigated these claims and learned new, non-public information that corroborated many of the allegations.” This was “reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

FL5: Traffic stops can be based on RS, not PC

Traffic stops can be based on reasonable suspicion, not just probable cause. State v. Howard, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618 (Fla. 5th DCA May 9, 2025). A light bar on a three wheel off road vehicle was reasonable suspicion for … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL5: Traffic stops can be based on RS, not PC

S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks claim fails. The omitted allegedly exculpatory evidence either wasn’t material to the probable cause finding or wasn’t known by law enforcement at the time the warrant issued. In this circuit, the collective knowledge doctrine applies to warrantless searches, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

W.D.Va.: Not IAC to logically choose 4A arguments

Trial counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing his desired defendant’s personal Franks issue when lack of probable cause was a better issue. He also wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that GPS tracking across state lines was unreasonable. Appellate counsel wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Not IAC to logically choose 4A arguments