Daily Archives: January 19, 2025

DE: Instagram SW was narrowly limited by time

Instagram warrants were supported by probable cause showing both that crimes occurred and that evidence would be found in the account, based on the detailed facts in the affidavits. The warrants satisfied the particularity requirement as the date ranges were … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Social media warrants | Comments Off on DE: Instagram SW was narrowly limited by time

CA5: Where place to be searched appeared to be one residence, not two, SW valid

The search warrant was for 8977 Deer Trail Run, but it turned out to be two properties. “From all outward appearances there was only one property, not two. The officers acted in objectively reasonable good faith in relying on the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: Where place to be searched appeared to be one residence, not two, SW valid

E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

Stopping and searching the car and person of defense counsel coming into a USMS jail did not violate defendant’s right to access to counsel. The limitations were all reasonable. United States v. Freeman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6745 (E.D. Okla. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

NY Albany Co.: Unrestrained administrative searches of cannabis stores violates 4A

Petitioners show a likelihood of success on their claim for injunctive relief from unrestrained “administrative inspections,” essentially without boundaries. Super Smoke N Save LLC v. N.Y. State Cannabis Control Bd., 2025 NY Slip Op 25009 (Albany Co. Jan. 13, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on NY Albany Co.: Unrestrained administrative searches of cannabis stores violates 4A