Monthly Archives: July 2021

WA: PC and nexus shown for CSLI warrant before Carpenter

Defendant was a suspect in a diamond theft. Police obtained a search warrant for his cell phone location records and that placed him near the burglary at the time it happened, and there was probable cause for it. The search … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Overseizure, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: PC and nexus shown for CSLI warrant before Carpenter

Cal.2: Nest and surveillance camera on one’s own property to record ptfs’ loud parties didn’t violate their REP

Defendant’s cameras on their own property, including a Nest camera, that was intended to record plaintiffs’ loud parties did not invade their reasonable expectation of privacy, even if the Nest camera enhanced sound. Mezger v. Bick, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Cal.2: Nest and surveillance camera on one’s own property to record ptfs’ loud parties didn’t violate their REP

D.Vt.: CP SW doesn’t need a temporal limitation

A search warrant for child pornography doesn’t really need a temporal limitation, considering the nature of what’s sought. United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122802 (D. Vt. June 29, 2021):

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Vt.: CP SW doesn’t need a temporal limitation

DC: Probationer’s GPS records don’t need a SW

A search warrant isn’t required for police to obtain a probationer’s GPS records from the PO. United States v. Jackson, 214 A.3d 464 (D.C. 2019). Crocker v. United States, 2021 D.C. App. LEXIS 167 (July 1, 2021). The officers did … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on DC: Probationer’s GPS records don’t need a SW

LA2: Cell phone seizure and search moot where nothing used in court

Contemnor was in a grand jury proceeding, and he was holding his cell phone like he was recording it. Based on witness reports, a contempt order issued and the phone was seized. The court issued an order authorizing it be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA2: Cell phone seizure and search moot where nothing used in court

OH6: No RS as to def in a crowd in high crime area

Police arrived at a crowd on a parking lot in a high crime area. People were drinking in public and there was the smell of marijuana in the air, but none of that had anything to do with defendant. Thus, … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH6: No RS as to def in a crowd in high crime area

CA1: Failure to object to R&R was waiver for appeal

Defendant’s failure to object to the R&R on a search claim was waiver of the issue for appeal. United States v. Maldonado-Peña, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 19508 (1st Cir. June 30, 2021). Motorist passed out at the wheel and the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Failure to object to R&R was waiver for appeal

WI: With no police misconduct and they “acted by the book” there is no suppression

“In this case, the Sheriff’s Office detectives acted by the book.” The exclusionary rule would not be applied to police officers finding a prior download of data in a police database and using it to connect defendant to this homicide. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on WI: With no police misconduct and they “acted by the book” there is no suppression

WaPo: Federal agencies need stricter limits on facial recognition to protect privacy, says government watchdog

WaPo: Federal agencies need stricter limits on facial recognition to protect privacy, says government watchdog by Gerrit De Vynck (“Black Lives Matter protesters, Jan. 6 rioters and regular travelers are among those targeted by agencies using the tech, including the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: Federal agencies need stricter limits on facial recognition to protect privacy, says government watchdog