Daily Archives: June 27, 2020

CA9: Not precisely following CHP inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable

Not precisely following CHP policy in filing out the inventory papers didn’t per se make the inventory search unreasonable. United States v. Magdirila, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 19477 (9th Cir. June 23, 2020). The community caretaking function of police permitted … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory | Comments Off on CA9: Not precisely following CHP inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable

S.D.Ohio: Collective knowledge applies to traffic stops

The collective knowledge doctrine applies to traffic stops. United States v. Murray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111040 (S.D. Ohio June 24, 2020). “Applying this [deferential] standard of review to the warrant application, the Court has reviewed the application and finds … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Collective knowledge applies to traffic stops

MA: No right to counsel at execution of SW

“The defendant has presented no case law supporting his proposition that the target of a search warrant has a right to have counsel present during the execution of a warrant. The officers executed a warrant to search the defendant’s cell … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on MA: No right to counsel at execution of SW

E.D.Ky.: Objection to USMJ’s findings must specifically challenge 4A rationale

“Defendant’s objections do not address the Magistrate’s analysis or conclusions regarding Grounds 11 and 15. Instead, Defendant vaguely asserts that his counsel should have challenged the ‘validity of [the] evidence[.]’ (DE 406 at 7.) Defendant provides no basis to challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Objection to USMJ’s findings must specifically challenge 4A rationale

NY1: Seizure for forfeiture fails for lack of notice to owner

The city failed in its burden of proof for seizure for forfeiture that the owner was aware. Matter of Smith v. City of New York, 2020 NY Slip Op 03600, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3687 (1st Dept. June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on NY1: Seizure for forfeiture fails for lack of notice to owner

AZ: Challenging neutral and detached magistrate requires showing “systemic or patent partiality”

“In the appeal, Macias argued against the application of the good-faith exception, claiming that the magistrate’s conduct showed he had abandoned impartiality or was unable to act in a neutral and detached manner. … However, to warrant exclusion of the … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on AZ: Challenging neutral and detached magistrate requires showing “systemic or patent partiality”

WI: Incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional re implied consent; but GFE applies here

“We conclude that the incapacitated driver provision is unconstitutional because the implied consent that incapacitated drivers are deemed to have given and presumed not to have withdrawn does not satisfy any exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. However, we … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WI: Incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional re implied consent; but GFE applies here

Cal.1: Despite the pandemic, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of PC

Despite the pandemic and court closures, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause under Gerstein. Bullock v. Superior Court, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 575 (1st Dist. June 24, 2020). During a search of defendant’s house under … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.1: Despite the pandemic, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of PC

D.Minn.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require affiant officer to independently corroborate

The affidavit for the search warrant here was adequate to show nexus and probable cause for a search. The reliance on other officers’ information didn’t require this officer to independently corroborate it. United States v. Velazquez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require affiant officer to independently corroborate

IL: Arguing only lack of arrest warrant waives lack of PC

Pleading and litigating a motion to suppress in the trial court that the officers lacked an arrest warrant or an exception waived his appellate claim of a lack of probable cause. People v. Montes, 2020 IL App (2d) 180565, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IL: Arguing only lack of arrest warrant waives lack of PC