Daily Archives: August 2, 2016

S.D.N.Y.: Buying a vehicle and loaning it for a drug run is a loss of the REP; denial of knowledge of a secret compartment is a waiver of the REP

Defendant who bought a vehicle and then loaned it to another to do a drug run lacked standing in the vehicle. “Having provided the Yukon to Sandy for purposes of making the trip to New Orleans, Jorge Gomez thereby relinquished … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Buying a vehicle and loaning it for a drug run is a loss of the REP; denial of knowledge of a secret compartment is a waiver of the REP

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment?

ABA Journal: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment? by Erwin Chemerinsky: In the recently completed Supreme Court term, Utah v. Strieff was the only major decision where the conservatives prevailed in an ideologically divided … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on ABAJ: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment?

NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

New Jersey requires a court order, albeit on less than probable cause, to get telephone records. To enable criminal investigations to proceed, probable cause isn’t required. State v. Lunsford, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 717 (Aug. 1, 2016) (syllabus):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

MI dismisses grant of discretionary review on application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk

Michigan granted discretionary review to determine the application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk, but dismissed it after considering the briefs. Three justices dissented from declining to decide the case. People v. Radandt, 2016 Mich. LEXIS 1591 (July 29, 2016)*:

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MI dismisses grant of discretionary review on application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk

W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

There was more than probable cause, and inference on inference here showed it on the totality. A crack cocaine deal going down in a hotel room proved to be exigent circumstances. It would take two hours to get a search … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

S.D.Ill.: “perfunctory, one-sentence argument” in motion to suppress was no motion at all

“Mr. Lee made a perfunctory, one-sentence argument that the evidence seized during the search of his residence should be suppressed because there was ‘no probable cause to believe evidence related to [the charged] offenses would be found in Jonesboro Arkansas … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: “perfunctory, one-sentence argument” in motion to suppress was no motion at all

S.D.N.Y.: PC doesn’t have to be shown, just objective reliance on the showing for the issuance of the warrant

The affidavit for the search warrant was a close enough showing of probable cause to make reliance on the affidavit objectively reasonable under the good faith exception. United States v. Melendez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98940 (S.D.N.Y. July 28, 2016):

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: PC doesn’t have to be shown, just objective reliance on the showing for the issuance of the warrant

NH: Hot pursuit of a suspected murderer with a tracking dog permitted entry onto curtilage

Officers were in hot pursuit after a murder with a tracking dog when they entered defendant’s curtilage. The entry was reasonable under the circumstances. A house can be entered in hot pursuit; this entry onto the curtilage was minimal by … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NH: Hot pursuit of a suspected murderer with a tracking dog permitted entry onto curtilage

KS: Search incident does require actual proof of threat to officer safety, just a reasonable belief it’s a risk

To invoke the search incident doctrine, “the State need not prove that the officer’s safety was actually in jeopardy or that the officer believed his or her safety was in jeopardy before the officer has authority to seize personal property … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on KS: Search incident does require actual proof of threat to officer safety, just a reasonable belief it’s a risk