Daily Archives: August 7, 2016

NYLJ: Police Use of Force, the Constitution, and the New NYPD Policy

NYLJ: Police Use of Force, the Constitution, and the New NYPD Policy by Christopher Dunn: Earlier this summer, the NYPD—the nation’s largest and most influential police department—rolled out new use-of-force policies that have received precious little scrutiny. In light of … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYLJ: Police Use of Force, the Constitution, and the New NYPD Policy

SF Chronicle: Op-ed: First they take your stuff, then you get to ask for it back

SF Chronicle: Op-ed: First they take your stuff, then you get to ask for it back by Debra J. Saunders:

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on SF Chronicle: Op-ed: First they take your stuff, then you get to ask for it back

New law review article: The Original Fourth Amendment by Laura Donohue

New law review article: The Original Fourth Amendment by Laura Donohue, University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming. Abstract: The meaning of the rights enshrined in the Constitution provide a critical baseline for understanding the limits of government action — perhaps … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New law review article: The Original Fourth Amendment by Laura Donohue

ID: Accident investigation alone not exigency for warrantless blood draw

The fact of a motor vehicle accident investigation is alone not exigency for dispensing with a warrant for a blood draw. Instead, other officers could have been called in to help with the investigation or get the blood warrant. State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ID: Accident investigation alone not exigency for warrantless blood draw

MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to state tax proceedings

In this state tax case, the taxpayer claimed revenuers came to his liquor store and searched and seized by downloading his Quickbooks file to a flash drive. The state tax court holds that, even if the search was unreasonable, the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to state tax proceedings