Category Archives: Third Party Doctrine

CA2: § 215 of the Patriot Act does not authorize the NSA’s bulk collection of metadata of telephone calls

§ 215 of the Patriot Act does not authorize the NSA’s bulk collection of metadata of telephone calls, but the decision is stayed. The third party doctrine is important, but it doesn’t have to be reached. SCOTUS’s Amnesty International v. … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA2: § 215 of the Patriot Act does not authorize the NSA’s bulk collection of metadata of telephone calls

Business Insider: A federal court just dealt a potentially huge blow to cellphone privacy

Business Insider: A federal court just dealt a potentially huge blow to cellphone privacy by Maxwell Tani: The government doesn’t need a warrant to search cellphone tower location records, a federal appeals court in Atlanta has ruled. In a potentially … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Business Insider: A federal court just dealt a potentially huge blow to cellphone privacy

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Eleventh Circuit rules for the feds on cell-site records — but then overreaches

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Eleventh Circuit rules for the feds on cell-site records — but then overreaches by Orin Kerr: The en banc Eleventh Circuit has ruled that historical cell-site records are not protected by the Fourth Amendment under the third-party … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Eleventh Circuit rules for the feds on cell-site records — but then overreaches

CA11 (en banc): CSLI third party information accessed under the Stored Communications Act does not violate the Fourth Amendment

CSLI third party information accessed under the Stored Communications Act does not violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Davis, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7385 (11th Cir. May 5, 2015) (en banc) (4 concurrences, 2 dissents):

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA11 (en banc): CSLI third party information accessed under the Stored Communications Act does not violate the Fourth Amendment

American Thinker: Homeland Chief: Fourth Amendment ‘Beyond My Competence’

American Thinker: Homeland Chief: Fourth Amendment ‘Beyond My Competence’ by Mark J. Fitzgibbons: Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson, a man with sweeping power to invade the property rights and privacy of every American using judge-less warrants to search and … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on American Thinker: Homeland Chief: Fourth Amendment ‘Beyond My Competence’

The Hill: Lawmakers in cybersecurity rush

The Hill: Lawmakers in cybersecurity rush by Cory Bennett: Lawmakers are rushing to pass a major cybersecurity bill this month before a divisive debate over reauthorizing the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs bogs them down. Lawmakers have maintained that their … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on The Hill: Lawmakers in cybersecurity rush

WaPo: DHS revives quest for license-plate access

WaPo: DHS revives quest for license-plate access by Ellen Nakashima: The Department of Homeland Security is seeking bids from companies able to provide law enforcement officials with access to a national license-plate tracking system – a year after canceling a … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: DHS revives quest for license-plate access

D.Mass.: Power company was not a state actor in providing electrical usage information

“The aphorism that ‘one man’s trash is another man’s treasure’ would certainly apply to the law enforcement officials who investigated this case.” Here, the city sanitation workers were seeing large amounts of marijuana debris coming in, and they called the … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Power company was not a state actor in providing electrical usage information

New Samsung TVs eavesdrop via microphone in remote

It’s for voice recognition for controlling the TV set, but Samsung admits that third-parties can intercept. And some have facial recognition. TechCrunch: Today In Creepy Privacy Policies, Samsung’s Eavesdropping TV Daily Mail (UK): Samsung warns viewers: Our smart TVs could … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on New Samsung TVs eavesdrop via microphone in remote

SC Magazine: Act would require gov’t to get warrant for electronic content, geolocation data

SC Magazine: Act would require gov’t to get warrant for electronic content, geolocation data by Teri Robinson: A bipartisan trio of legislators reintroduced the Online Communication and Geolocation Protection Act to extend Fourth Amendment rights to electronic communications. A bipartisan … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on SC Magazine: Act would require gov’t to get warrant for electronic content, geolocation data

N.D.Ill.: SW not required for cell site location information; the third party doctrine hasn’t changed

A search warrant is not required for cell site location information. Jones is inapplicable, and the third party doctrine hasn’t changed. United States v. Lang, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7553 (N.D. Ill. January 23, 2015):

Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: SW not required for cell site location information; the third party doctrine hasn’t changed

NYTimes: Holder Fortifies Protection of News Media’s Phone Records, Notes or Emails

NYTimes: Holder Fortifies Protection of News Media’s Phone Records, Notes or Emails By Matt Apuzzo: Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Wednesday eliminated what journalism groups worried could be used as a loophole in the rules governing how and … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NYTimes: Holder Fortifies Protection of News Media’s Phone Records, Notes or Emails

Payson Roundup: Editorial: Background Checks For Guns

Payson Roundup: Editorial: Background Checks For Guns. This Arizona newspaper thinks that a background check is an unreasonable search. Consider this: If the third party doctrine is going anywhere, maybe the NRA can get off its ass and push this … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Payson Roundup: Editorial: Background Checks For Guns

E.D.N.C.: Third-party doctrine well entrenched and SCA shows Congress isn’t changing it, yet

All things considered, the third party doctrine is well established in SCOTUS precedent, and the court declines to depart from it. In addition, the Stored Communications Act, remaining unchanged, is evidence that Congress intends it to remain that way. Cell … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Third-party doctrine well entrenched and SCA shows Congress isn’t changing it, yet

City AM: Uber has five out of six bases in New York City suspended after failing to hand over trip records

City AM: Uber has five out of six bases in New York City suspended after failing to hand over trip records by Guy Bentley: New York City has suspended the majority of Uber bases after the taxi app company refused … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Informational privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on City AM: Uber has five out of six bases in New York City suspended after failing to hand over trip records

TechDirt: Court Asked Why There’s No Expectation Of Privacy In Cell Location Data, But An Expectation Of Privacy In The Cellphone Itself

TechDirt: Court Asked Why There’s No Expectation Of Privacy In Cell Location Data, But An Expectation Of Privacy In The Cellphone Itself by Tim Cushing: from the warrants-warranted dept

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informational privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on TechDirt: Court Asked Why There’s No Expectation Of Privacy In Cell Location Data, But An Expectation Of Privacy In The Cellphone Itself