Category Archives: Forfeiture

Reason: The FBI Hopes These Cute Puppies Will Distract You From Unconstitutional Civil Asset Forfeitures

Reason: The FBI Hopes These Cute Puppies Will Distract You From Unconstitutional Civil Asset Forfeitures by Scott Shackford: Surrender the Fifth Amendment or the dog dies.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: The FBI Hopes These Cute Puppies Will Distract You From Unconstitutional Civil Asset Forfeitures

TechDirt: Data From Court Documents Shows Texas Law Enforcement Playing Small-Ball Forfeiture, Not Doing Much To Stop Drug Trafficking

TechDirt: Data From Court Documents Shows Texas Law Enforcement Playing Small-Ball Forfeiture, Not Doing Much To Stop Drug Trafficking by Tim Cushing: Small seizures work out best for law enforcement. The cost of fighting the forfeiture usually outpaces the value … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on TechDirt: Data From Court Documents Shows Texas Law Enforcement Playing Small-Ball Forfeiture, Not Doing Much To Stop Drug Trafficking

CA9: Overbreadth as to one category in SW moot by fact documents were included in another

In a complex tax avoidance scheme, the IRS obtained search warrant was overbroad as to one category of things to be seized in ¶ u but it was mooted by the fact that items arguably seized under that category were … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Overbreadth | Comments Off on CA9: Overbreadth as to one category in SW moot by fact documents were included in another

M.D.Ala.: “Motions to suppress evidence are appropriate in civil forfeiture proceedings …”

“Motions to suppress evidence are appropriate in civil forfeiture proceedings because the seizure and subsequent civil forfeiture of assets implicates the Fourth Amendment. Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania, 380 U.S. 693, 702 (1965) (holding that the Fourth Amendment is applicable to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: “Motions to suppress evidence are appropriate in civil forfeiture proceedings …”

E.D.Tenn.: Confronting possible trespassers in a house and asking for IDs was reasonable

The officer here confronted trespassers which he suspected might be squatters and drug users. “The Court finds that the officer’s questions and actions were reasonably related to learning the identities of the people on the property, learning whether they were … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Confronting possible trespassers in a house and asking for IDs was reasonable

SCOTUS: The excessive fines clause of the 8A applies to the states via 14A as to in rem forfeitures

Timbs v. Indiana, 2019 U.S. LEXIS 1350 (Feb. 20, 2019). Syllabus:

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on SCOTUS: The excessive fines clause of the 8A applies to the states via 14A as to in rem forfeitures

Reason.com: How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech

Reason.com: How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech by Elizabeth Nolan Brown: Sex, publishing, and quasi-legal theft collide in the Backpage prosecution. Prosecutors are ignoring the Constitution and legal precedent in their zeal to punish … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason.com: How the Feds Are Using Civil Asset Forfeiture to Threaten Free Speech

OH9: Inadequate findings on officer safety patdown requires remand

The trial court’s findings of an alleged officer safety justification for his patdown are inadequate for the court of appeals to decide whether the state justified the patdown. Remanded for more findings. State v. Murphy, 2019-Ohio-515, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH9: Inadequate findings on officer safety patdown requires remand

IN: Seizure of only cash under SW for drugs and cash from drug sales was unreasonable and without PC

When police had a search warrant for a package that included cash for drug purposes in the particular description, the seizure of only cash wasn’t justified. Nothing showed that the money was related to crime. Hodges v. State, 2018 Ind. … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Overseizure | Comments Off on IN: Seizure of only cash under SW for drugs and cash from drug sales was unreasonable and without PC

OH6: Leaving house to do a drug deal and going back home right after is inference drugs at home

The affiant’s allegation that defendant left his house to conduct drug deals then returned there right afterward creates a reasonable inference that drugs are kept in the house. Thus, there was probable cause for the search warrant. State v. Pettaway, … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Inventory, Nexus | Comments Off on OH6: Leaving house to do a drug deal and going back home right after is inference drugs at home

S.D.N.Y.: Court can’t return property under Rule 41(g) after civil forfeiture starts

Once a civil forfeiture proceeding has started, the court loses jurisdiction to consider a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property. United States v. Paulino, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176893 (S.D. N.Y. Oct. 16, 2018). The seizure of defendant’s cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Court can’t return property under Rule 41(g) after civil forfeiture starts

OH2: Motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot

A motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot. State v. Housley, 2018-Ohio-4140, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 4467 (2d Dist. Oct. 12, 2018). There was no Franks violation. Officers got permission from a child to … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH2: Motion for return of property after a forfeiture order is final is moot

OR: Failure to appeal order denying return of property precludes later relief

Defendant’s denial of his motion for return of property was a final appealable order, and his failure to appeal foreclosed later recovery. State v. Fenton, 294 Ore. App. 48, 2018 Ore. App. LEXIS 1091 (Sep. 13, 2018). Defense counsel made … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OR: Failure to appeal order denying return of property precludes later relief

D.Ariz.: Threat to use a Taser vitiates consent

Defendant’s alleged consent at the I-19 checkpoint in Arizona was involuntary. She was on a bus that was stopped, she was seized, she could not leave the secondary checkpoint, the CBP agent followed her, “when Ms. Rodriguez hesitated or became … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Threat to use a Taser vitiates consent

OH11: DAs get no immunity for forfeiture of a firearm others had an interest in

Prosecutors had no absolute immunity for disposing of a firearm after defendant’s conviction when others had a legal interest in the firearm because it was an administrative function. Ownership and possession are different concepts, and forfeiture of others’ interests were … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH11: DAs get no immunity for forfeiture of a firearm others had an interest in

N.D.Ill. Bankr.: A bankruptcy filed after seizure can defeat an attempted forfeiture

The City of Chicago seized a car for a forfeiture, and the owner filed bankruptcy. The city refused to give the car up to the bankruptcy court, and the court holds the city violated the bankruptcy stay. In re Shannon, … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on N.D.Ill. Bankr.: A bankruptcy filed after seizure can defeat an attempted forfeiture

WaPo: Police seized $10,000 of a couple’s cash. They couldn’t get it back — until they went public.

WaPo: Police seized $10,000 of a couple’s cash. They couldn’t get it back — until they went public. by Deanna Paul. They won it gambling in a casino. The police didn’t bother to check. Or care.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on WaPo: Police seized $10,000 of a couple’s cash. They couldn’t get it back — until they went public.

CA11: Apparent consent for 5:30 am entry defeats “egregious” 4A violation for exclusion in immigration removal

Petitioner’s declaration did not make a prima facie case of an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment to preclude evidence in his removal proceeding. The entry was at 5:30 am, but there was also evidence of consent to the entry. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA11: Apparent consent for 5:30 am entry defeats “egregious” 4A violation for exclusion in immigration removal

WaPo: She saved thousands to open a medical clinic in Nigeria. U.S. Customs took all of it at the airport.

WaPo: She saved thousands to open a medical clinic in Nigeria. U.S. Customs took all of it at the airport. by Meagan Flynn: The questioning threw her off guard. She explained she had legally earned the money and she was … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Forfeiture | Comments Off on WaPo: She saved thousands to open a medical clinic in Nigeria. U.S. Customs took all of it at the airport.

Montgomery Advertiser: Opinion: Policing for profit prevails at Alabama Legislature

Montgomery Advertiser: Opinion: Policing for profit prevails at Alabama Legislature by Leah Nelson and Shay Farley, Alabama Voices:

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Montgomery Advertiser: Opinion: Policing for profit prevails at Alabama Legislature