Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

ND: Refusal to submit statute doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment under McNeely

The North Dakota refusal to submit statute doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment or state constitution under McNeely. State v. Birchfield, 2015 ND 6, 2015 N.D. LEXIS 5 (January 15, 2015):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ND: Refusal to submit statute doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment under McNeely

CA7 & Cal.1: GPS placed in 2011 saved by GFE; one case a triple murder

When the GPS was put on defendant’s car in 2011 before Jones, binding precedent said that it was lawful, so the good faith exception applies. United States v. Taylor, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 601 (7th Cir. January 14, 2015); People … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA7 & Cal.1: GPS placed in 2011 saved by GFE; one case a triple murder

Cal.2: Continued combativeness of DUI suspect was exigency for no BAC warrant

Defendant was driving a semi that had a head-on collision with another vehicle where defendant was driving on the wrong side of the road. He stopped nearly ½ mile from the accident. When police arrived he was combative and profane … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on Cal.2: Continued combativeness of DUI suspect was exigency for no BAC warrant

WI: McNeely retroactive and abrogates prior law, but GFE saves prior blood draws

McNeely applies retroactively in Wisconsin, but the state gets the benefit of a Davis-type good faith exception [without citing Davis]. The lead case is State v. Kennedy, 2014 WI 132, 2014 Wisc. LEXIS 954 (December 26, 2014), where a car … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: McNeely retroactive and abrogates prior law, but GFE saves prior blood draws

ND: DUI implied consent warning doesn’t coerce consent

The DUI implied consent warning doesn’t coerce consent. One can always refuse. State v. Nagel, 2014 ND 224, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 236 (December 18, 2014): [¶12] The next question is whether the consent was voluntary. This Court has previously determined, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ND: DUI implied consent warning doesn’t coerce consent

CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

A search warrant issued for plaintiffs’ place based on a “13 year” drug investigation that led to trace evidence of drug usage in the basement. The charges filed were ultimately dismissed. The officers were qualifiedly immune because of the issuance … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: SW was not bare bones and a reasonable officer could rely on it; therefore, qualified immunity

Denver Post: Colorado DUI case sent to U.S. Supreme Court, focuses on blood tests

Denver Post: Colorado DUI case sent to U.S. Supreme Court, focuses on blood tests by Jorden Steffen: Arapahoe County prosecutors have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a decision by a state judge and the Colorado Supreme Court, which … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Denver Post: Colorado DUI case sent to U.S. Supreme Court, focuses on blood tests

CA3: No REP of passenger who abandoned car with stolen property in it

A passenger who walks away from a car when stopped has abandoned the car. He also has no reasonable expectation of privacy in stolen property he left in the trunk. In a suppression motion and hearing, any argument not raised … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on CA3: No REP of passenger who abandoned car with stolen property in it

ID applies McNeely and requires a warrant for DWI blood draws

McNeely requires a warrant for DWI BAC blood draws. State v. Halseth, 2014 Ida. LEXIS 313 (December 2, 2014). The EEOC sent emails about age discrimination to hundreds of plaintiff’s employees. The company sued the EEOC claiming, inter alia, a … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on ID applies McNeely and requires a warrant for DWI blood draws

CA11: Welfare recipients can’t be drug tested without reasonable suspicion

Welfare recipients can’t be drug tested without reasonable suspicion as a condition of receiving benefits under the Fourth Amendment. [This is Lebron II.] Lebron v. Sec’y of the Fla. Dept. of Children & Families, 772 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2014): … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on CA11: Welfare recipients can’t be drug tested without reasonable suspicion

IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’ implied consent statute is not unconstitutional per se under McNeely. Every case has to be judged on its own facts. This involved a serious accident with injuries requiring hospitalization and defendant consented to the blood draw. People v. Hasselbring, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Implied consent law not per se unconstitutional under McNeely

Cal.1st: McNeely DUI warrant requirement is subject to the Davis good faith exception

The McNeely DUI warrant requirement is subject to the Davis good faith exception. People v. Jones, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1083 (1st Dist. November 26, 2014): Prior to McNeely, all binding judicial precedent in this state, both at the Supreme … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.1st: McNeely DUI warrant requirement is subject to the Davis good faith exception

TX: BAC testing not categorically subject to warrant exception; SW required here

After a few dozen appellate decisions on McNeely and Texas’s implied consent law, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals takes one on the state’s petition for discretionary review and holds “the warrantless, nonconsensual testing of a DWI suspect’s blood does … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX: BAC testing not categorically subject to warrant exception; SW required here

OH4: Difficulty in finding a judge to get a SW at 3 am was exigency for BAC without warrant

Difficulty in getting a search warrant prepared and finding a judge at 3 am was exigency for dispensing with a search warrant in a DUI case because of natural dissipation of BAC. State v. Roar, 2014-Ohio-5214, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH4: Difficulty in finding a judge to get a SW at 3 am was exigency for BAC without warrant

CA5: City DPW worker driving pickup in accident he caused could be drug tested

City Public Works Department supervisor was subject to drug testing under city employment manual for an on the job vehicle accident where his pickup truck grazed a tree stump and he was admittedly at fault. The test was about three … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on CA5: City DPW worker driving pickup in accident he caused could be drug tested

NM: BAC blood draw by SW doesn’t require arrest already have occurred

A BAC blood draw by search warrant does not require the defendant be under arrest first. “[A] constitutionally permissible search of a person’s blood may arise either from an arrest pursuant to the Implied Consent Act or a valid search … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Due process | Comments Off on NM: BAC blood draw by SW doesn’t require arrest already have occurred

TN: Officer’s lack of experience in getting a search warrant is not an “exigency” for a warrantless blood draw

The officer’s lack of experience in getting a search warrant is not an “exigency” for a warrantless blood draw under McNeely. State v. Gardner, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1023 (November 12, 2014) (link not available when posted; go here … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on TN: Officer’s lack of experience in getting a search warrant is not an “exigency” for a warrantless blood draw

TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI

Exigent circumstances didn’t justify the warrantless blood draw. Neither the automobile exception nor the search incident doctrine can be used to search a person’s blood. Smith v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12372 (Tex. App.– Corpus Christi-Edinburg November 13, 2014):

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident | Comments Off on TX13: Neither automobile exception nor search incident permit warrantless blood draw for DUI

Two of this week’s Texas McNeely opinions

Defendant’s warrantless blood draw was without exigent circumstances after he withdrew his consent. The motion to suppress should have been granted. Leal v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12286 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist) November 13, 2014) (with dissent).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Two of this week’s Texas McNeely opinions

IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely

Illinois’s implied-consent statutory scheme did not unconstitutionally circumvent defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights by punishing him for refusing to take the chemical analysis by suspending his driver’s license and introducing his refusal against him at his criminal trial. A per se … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL implied consent statute not unconstitutional under McNeely