Category Archives: Inventory

E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

A mixed motive for an inventory search doesn’t make it unreasonable as long as the inventory was reasonable. United States v. Dowl, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7184 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2017):

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

E.D.Okla.: Search of vehicle on roadside not unreasonable because it started as a proper inventory

Defendant was stopped for his tag light being out, and it resulted in finding that his DL was suspended. That meant that his vehicle would be towed. The inventory by all appearances was starting, because a video showed the inventory … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of vehicle on roadside not unreasonable because it started as a proper inventory

W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

There was no reasonable suspicion for a protective weapons search. Without reasonable suspicion, all cars are subject to search without cause, thereby nullifying the Fourth Amendment. Defendant was stopped in his driveway, and there was also an effort to call … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

After defendant’s car was stopped, the officers conducted a Michigan v. Long protective weapons search of the car while gaining control of the defendant, and a gun was located. There was a search incident: “Furthermore, he was standing at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

TX2: “the impoundment of the vehicle was a task tied to the traffic infraction” and didn’t extend it

Defendant was stopped for a brake light infraction, and neither he nor the passenger had a valid DL or insurance. Thus, impoundment is in order. “Similarly, the impoundment of the vehicle was a task tied to the traffic infraction, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on TX2: “the impoundment of the vehicle was a task tied to the traffic infraction” and didn’t extend it

IN: Search incident of jacket left in car on arrest for outstanding warrant was unreasonable

Defendant was pulled over because an LPN check showed his license was suspended and there was a warrant out for him. When he got out of the car, he took off his jacket and left it in the car. Since … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Search incident of jacket left in car on arrest for outstanding warrant was unreasonable

CA11: Prior drug sale from house was nexus for SW of house

Nexus was shown for the search of defendant’s house by the prior drug transactions that occurred inside the house. This was a seven year long conspiracy. United States v. Woodard, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21382 (11th Cir. Nov. 30, 2016). … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Nexus | Comments Off on CA11: Prior drug sale from house was nexus for SW of house

D.Minn.: The officer doesn’t need to cite the specific inventory policy section at the suppression hearing to make the inventory lawful

Defendant’s stop for speeding was justified. “Officer Petterson testified that he decided to impound the Acura because the Acura was not registered to Reilly; the owner was not present; both occupants of the vehicle were being taken into custody; the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The officer doesn’t need to cite the specific inventory policy section at the suppression hearing to make the inventory lawful

NY: Shoplifting custodial arrest justified impoundment and towing of def’s car

Defendant drove to a store and was custodially arrested there for shoplifting. Towing and inventory of his vehicle off their parking lot was reasonable. A valid inventory followed. People v. Tardi, 2016 NY Slip Op 07822, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3535 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Shoplifting custodial arrest justified impoundment and towing of def’s car

S.D.Ohio: More than a conclusory statement of recklessness or intent required for Franks hearing

Just because information is erroneous doesn’t get you a Franks hearing. More than a mere conclusion is required that the statement was recklessly or deliberately false. United States v. Kurtz, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160356 (S.D.Ohio Nov. 18, 2016). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: More than a conclusory statement of recklessness or intent required for Franks hearing

MA: Inventory of backpack was unnecessary where def’s grandmother was there and could have taken it; giving it to her satisfied legal justifications for inventory

There was no need to inventory defendant’s backpack when his car was being impounded where his grandmother was there and could have taken it away. Since a purpose of inventory is to prevent theft and false claims, turning the backpack … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Inventory of backpack was unnecessary where def’s grandmother was there and could have taken it; giving it to her satisfied legal justifications for inventory

CA10: If an inventory could be lawfully conducted, the fact it stopped when guns were found doesn’t make it void

Defendant’s car was subjected to an inventory which he contended was unreasonable. If he had been reasonably conducted, the firearms would have been found in any event, such as where an inventory starts but ends when something significant is found, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA10: If an inventory could be lawfully conducted, the fact it stopped when guns were found doesn’t make it void

E.D.Mo.: A vehicle inventory is not invalid because it is discretionary

Defendant had standing in his girlfriend’s car. His stuff was throughout it, and he drove it some. An inventory is not invalid because the decision to inventory or not is discretionary. United States v. Gilmore, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156240 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: A vehicle inventory is not invalid because it is discretionary

NY1: Search of a car doesn’t have to occur at the scene of stop

Defendant was stopped, and the smell of marijuana came from the car when he was stopped. A joint was seen on the console. The car was towed rather than searched at the scene. The search back at the station was … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NY1: Search of a car doesn’t have to occur at the scene of stop

MA: Seizing backpack from impounded car was unreasonable where def’s grandmother was present and would have taken it

Defendant’s grandmother came to the scene of his stop where his car was being impounded. The contents of the car, here a backpack, could have just been given to the grandmother rather than seize and search it, too. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Seizing backpack from impounded car was unreasonable where def’s grandmother was present and would have taken it

CO: State didn’t prove necessity for impoundment of car for driving on a suspended DL

The state failed to prove that defendant’s driving on a suspended license justified impoundment and inventory of the car. The state didn’t offer evidence to show that defendant would drive off from the ticket or that he would imperil other … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CO: State didn’t prove necessity for impoundment of car for driving on a suspended DL

D.Neb.: Eviction of the occupants of an apartment lose standing when the landlord takes over

An eviction of the occupants of an apartment lose standing when the landlord takes over. “The Court finds that defendant lacks standing. At the time of the search, the landlord was legally and lawfully in possession of the Arias Apartment. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Eviction of the occupants of an apartment lose standing when the landlord takes over

CA7: Family computer that everybody knew password to gives common authority to all

The computer in the house belonged to defendant but it was a family computer and everybody knew the password. That being the case, any one of them had common authority over the computer to consent to its search. The fact … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Inventory | Comments Off on CA7: Family computer that everybody knew password to gives common authority to all

AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

The 4 on the year on the LPN expiration sticker looked funny, so the Trooper ran the LPN and it came back expired in 2011. It had been altered with a marker. Defendant said he borrowed his friend’s pickup. Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on AR: Just because officer says on video “He’s been arrested for dope, dope, and dope … carrying a weapon” doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a valid inventory

E.D.N.Y.: Fact officer went back and looked again doing inventory didn’t prove it was investigative

The fact the officer doing the inventory went back and looked again because he thought he missed something or value doesn’t prove that the inventory was unreasonable. United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117530 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2016):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Fact officer went back and looked again doing inventory didn’t prove it was investigative