Category Archives: Warrant requirement

OH3: Oral testimony for SW doesn’t have to be transcribed before SW served

Oral testimony in support of issuance of a search warrant did not have to be transcribed and made part of the record before the warrant was served. State v. Wilson, 2017-Ohio-5484, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2544 (3d Dist. June 26, … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH3: Oral testimony for SW doesn’t have to be transcribed before SW served

OR: There is no state constitutional requirement the state get a telephonic warrant to avoid exigency

The state showed adequate evidence that it would take 4-5 hours to obtain a search warrant in this case, and that was enough to show exigency here. The defense put on proof that the state could have obtained a telephonic … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: There is no state constitutional requirement the state get a telephonic warrant to avoid exigency

D.D.C.: Google has to produce e-mails on server in Ireland, declining to follow 2d Cir. in Microsoft II

After Second Circuit split 4-4 on whether Google could be compelled to provide e-mails stored in a server in Ireland by a warrant, a USMJ in D.C. holds that Google has to produce e-mails stored on that server. In the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, E-mail, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Google has to produce e-mails on server in Ireland, declining to follow 2d Cir. in Microsoft II

IN: Unchallenged SW that led to tax assessment made seizure reasonable

“In their second amended complaint, the Garwoods did assert a Fourth Amendment claim. … It is unclear what became of it, as it was still live when the State moved for summary judgment and survived that motion. In any event, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: Unchallenged SW that led to tax assessment made seizure reasonable

W.D.N.Y.: SW materials not yet releasable because investigation is ongoing; defense can get it later

The search warrant materials in this case are not released yet because the case is still pretrial and there is investigative and CI information that shouldn’t be disclosed yet. “In evaluating a common law claim of access to judicial documents, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW materials not yet releasable because investigation is ongoing; defense can get it later

IA: Failure to sign SW affidavit when sworn can be cured by testimony

The affiant swore to the affidavit for search warrant before the issuing magistrate, but it inadvertently wasn’t signed. That’s an error cured by testimony, even if the magistrate has to testify too. State v. Angel, 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 41 … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IA: Failure to sign SW affidavit when sworn can be cured by testimony

D.Nev.: Def’s unsupported allegation judge didn’t sign SW overcome by officer’s testimony

Defendant’s unsupported testimony that the search warrant does not appear to have a judge’s original signature on it fails in the face of testimony from the officer that he saw the judge sign it. The fact it took 120 days … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def’s unsupported allegation judge didn’t sign SW overcome by officer’s testimony

CA5: SW for 320 CR 401 didn’t include 320A; telephonic warrant fails for lack of a record of what caused to issue

A search warrant for 320 CR 401 did not objectively include 320A CR 401, a different address and building 200 yards away with a separate electric meter, so summary judgment was improperly granted the police. In addition, a telephone warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA5: SW for 320 CR 401 didn’t include 320A; telephonic warrant fails for lack of a record of what caused to issue

TN: Procedural errors in handling the paperwork of a SW after execution are overlooked if no prejudice

Alleged mishandling of the paperwork on a search warrant for new DNA in a cold case hit could have resulted in a motion to suppress, but it’s not obvious that it would be granted because procedural defects in the return … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Procedural errors in handling the paperwork of a SW after execution are overlooked if no prejudice

CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF

CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF by Zachary D Spilman:

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF

IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

Officers were tipped off to the defendant coming through with drugs eight hours before he was stopped. The stop was for speeding and weaving, and a drug dog was used which alerted. The fact the officers had eight hours warning … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: 4A doesn’t require a SW be obtained at the earliest possible time

W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

The wiretap underlying the search warrant has already been sustained by the USDJ, so that can’t support suppressing the search. Defendant’s Franks challenge to the affidavit because of the date is really just a typo (2004 v. 2012), so it … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

LA5: Typo as to IP source in CP case was irrelevant to existence of probable cause

A typographical error as to defendant’s internet provider did not undermine the probable cause for the search warrant for his child pornography on his computer. It has nothing to do with the probable cause. State v. Shiell, 2016 La. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on LA5: Typo as to IP source in CP case was irrelevant to existence of probable cause

IN: Cell phone photograph of SW sent to officer’s phone satisfied the statute for officer to have warrant for search

The officer here needed a search warrant for defendant’s blood for suspicion of DUI. When the warrant was issued, a photograph of it was sent to his cell phone. Defendant objected to the form of the warrant claiming that it … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone photograph of SW sent to officer’s phone satisfied the statute for officer to have warrant for search

W.D.N.Y.: USMJ accidentally crossing out a paragraph when a single sentence about no-knock was intended to be struck didn’t undermine PC; judge deciding the case made the mistake

The USMJ who issued the search warrant decides its validity. An entire paragraph was crossed out, but the court says that it only intended to cross out the no-knock authorization. Since the warrant was signed and the officers were directed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: USMJ accidentally crossing out a paragraph when a single sentence about no-knock was intended to be struck didn’t undermine PC; judge deciding the case made the mistake

LA rule permitting electronic warrant applications and issuance doesn’t violate 4A or Rule 41

The police got a search warrant from a Louisiana state judge by electronic means, but the case ended up in federal court. Louisiana’s criminal rule permitting electronic warrant applications does not violate the “oath or affirmation” requirement of the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on LA rule permitting electronic warrant applications and issuance doesn’t violate 4A or Rule 41

D.V.I.: Telephonic warrant requirements were complied with and GFE didn’t apply

The telephonic search warrant here failed the requirements of Rule 41, including the verbatim reading of the warrant to the issuing judge, and didn’t mention that they also wanted to search a car that was omitted from the warrant. The … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Telephonic warrant requirements were complied with and GFE didn’t apply

E.D.Wis.: Def didn’t show he was removed from house just so he couldn’t refuse consent

Defendant, a suspect in a shooting, was arrested in his house, handcuffed, patted down for a weapon, and removed to the police station. His girlfriend lived with him and consented to a search of the premises. Defendant could not show … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Def didn’t show he was removed from house just so he couldn’t refuse consent

CO: Humane Society employee not statutorily authorized to procure SW, but court refuses to suppress

While an “animal protection agent” of the Humane Society is not statutorily authorized to seek a search warrant under Colorado law, the court refuses to suppress because there was probable cause and the warrant was otherwise executed reasonably. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CO: Humane Society employee not statutorily authorized to procure SW, but court refuses to suppress

NC: Failure to give inventory to target of search doesn’t lead to suppression

The inventory to be given to the person from whom stuff was seized has to be given, but a failure to comply doesn’t warrant suppression. It’s after the search so it doesn’t involve the right to be free from unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NC: Failure to give inventory to target of search doesn’t lead to suppression