Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

S.D.N.Y.: Screen chat service that passed information to NCMEC was still a private actor

Screen chat service that passed information to NCMEC was still a private actor. United States v. Ditomasso, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9645 (S.D.N.Y. January 26, 2015): On October 28, 2014, I ruled that DiTomasso had a reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Screen chat service that passed information to NCMEC was still a private actor

WaPo: New role for District police body cameras

Washington Post: New role for District police body cameras by Keith Alexander: When D.C. police began outfitting some officers’ shirts and glasses with miniature cameras in the fall, the objectives were obvious: to protect residents from overly zealous officers during … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: New role for District police body cameras

D.Kan.: Return of property denied; although this case dismissed, codefendant’s case still alive

Return of property denied despite the fact defendant’s case was dismissed. Defendant’s wife was his codefendant, and she was convicted, but she’s litigating a 2255, so the evidence may still be needed by the government. United States v. Neighbors, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Return of property denied; although this case dismissed, codefendant’s case still alive

NPR: Police Departments Issuing Body Cameras Discover Drawbacks

NPR: Police Departments Issuing Body Cameras Discover Drawbacks by Martin Kaste: Wearable video cameras are fast becoming standard-issue gear for American police. The cameras promise a technological answer to complaints about racial bias and excessive force. But in fact, the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NPR: Police Departments Issuing Body Cameras Discover Drawbacks

OH12: LEO use of the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System does not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy

Law enforcement use of the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System does not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy or the doctor-patient privilege. Here, a police officer was investigated for doctor shopping to obtain schedule III and IV drugs from multiple … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH12: LEO use of the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System does not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy

N.D.Ill.: Hospital owners and doctors had no standing in its bank or patient records

The operator of a small hospital corporation with at most 25 employees had no standing in the bank records of the corporation. Because they might have standing in their own offices doesn’t translate into standing over bank records. As to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Hospital owners and doctors had no standing in its bank or patient records

CA7: No reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation in the back of a police car

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation in the back of a police car. Just because the defendant was quiet when the officer was around doesn’t make it objectively reasonable. Williams and the squadrol (paddy wagon) distinguished. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA7: No reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation in the back of a police car

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review by Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz: On March 3, at 10 a.m., the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Los Angeles v. Patel, a fascinating case about the … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review

D.Vt.: Def had no REP by giving a load of MJ to a driver to take to him in another state

Defendant packed marijuana in a trailer and entrusted it to a driver to take it to him in Vermont. The trailer was stopped in Illinois, subjected to a dog sniff, and the marijuana was found. The driver agreed to continue … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Def had no REP by giving a load of MJ to a driver to take to him in another state

PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

In 2013, Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the state constitution prohibits warrantless taping inside a suspect’s home with a video camera planted on an informant. Commonwealth v. Dunnavant, 2013 PA Super 38, 63 A.3d 1252 (2013) (posted here). That decision … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

No REP in peer-to-peer file sharing. Yes, that issue is still raised

Defendant’s computer was on the Gnutella peer-to-peer network. The police went in and found 1571 files for sharing and did a software driven search and found child porn on some of them. A week later they went back and found … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on No REP in peer-to-peer file sharing. Yes, that issue is still raised

LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

There is no constitutional impediment to a wired CI coming into the defendant’s house to video record a drug transaction. He was invited in. State v. Montgomery, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2974 (La. App. 3 Cir. December 17, 2014). The … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on LA3: Invited in CI videoing drug transaction is not Fourth Amendment violation

MO holds overstaying hotel rental period waiver of REP

Defendant paid for a room at a hotel through 11/7. On 11/8 he was still there and hadn’t paid. Hotel security went to the room, unlocked it, and the inside latch was locked. The door opened only two inches. Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MO holds overstaying hotel rental period waiver of REP

WaPo: Volokh: Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment

WaPo: Volokh: Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr: Regular readers will recall the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment introduced by the DC Circuit in United States v. Maynard, by which law … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Two district courts adopt the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment

D.N.J.: No REP in a burner phone def didn’t claim he used and wasn’t subscribed to anybody

This defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in somebody else’s cell phone or the records of its use. He never used it or claimed any interest in it. He also lacks any standing in an unsubscribed burner phone. The … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: No REP in a burner phone def didn’t claim he used and wasn’t subscribed to anybody

N.D.W.Va.: Lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one

There is a lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one. Affirmative steps must be taken to lock it up and bar others. United States v. Skruck, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167952 (N.D. W.Va. December … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Lesser expectation of privacy in a commercial dumpster than in a residential one

NPR: NOLA Police Hope Body Cameras Provide Important Evidence

NPR: NOLA Police Hope Body Cameras Provide Important Evidence: Police officers in New Orleans started wearing cameras this spring. Independent police monitor Susan Hutson tells NPR’s Scott Simon how the NOPD’s camera implementation is going.

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NPR: NOLA Police Hope Body Cameras Provide Important Evidence

W.D.N.Y.: SW for dumpsters here didn’t violate “business curtilage” nor a REP

A search warrant was issued for dumpsters on a “large commercial property” for evidence of asbestos dumping in violation of EPA law. Accepting that there might be a “business curtilage,” the court finds this search warrant didn’t violate any reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for dumpsters here didn’t violate “business curtilage” nor a REP

The Atlantic: Seen It All Before: 10 Predictions About Police Body Cameras

The Atlantic: Seen It All Before: 10 Predictions About Police Body Cameras by Robinson Meyer: Twenty years ago, law enforcement and activists teamed up to support another video surveillance technology: in-car dash cams.

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Seen It All Before: 10 Predictions About Police Body Cameras

AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it’s not. Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014). … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Exclusionary rule, Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience