Category Archives: Privileges

CA6: Marital privilege doesn’t apply to a recorded jail call

Marital privilege doesn’t apply to jail telephone calls defendant knew would be recorded because of the lack of a confidential communication. United States v. Ayala, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 31345 (6th Cir. Nov. 6, 2018). The Pennsylvania Wiretap Act is … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on CA6: Marital privilege doesn’t apply to a recorded jail call

IL: Marital communications obtained by SW remained privileged

Confidential spousal communications obtained by a search warrant do not lose their privileged character. People v. Gliniewicz, 2018 IL App (2d) 170490, 2018 Ill. App. LEXIS 818 (Nov. 2, 2018). The state seized text messages but didn’t disclose them in … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on IL: Marital communications obtained by SW remained privileged

FL4: Order to juvenile to produce cell phone passcode quashed

A minor was in juvenile court for being in an accident under the influence. The police wanted the contents of his cell phone. The juvenile court’s order for him to disclose the password to his cell phone is quashed because … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on FL4: Order to juvenile to produce cell phone passcode quashed

S.D.Fla.: The FTC sought an order of production of cell phones and laptops for search in an action for injunction; production not testimonial and PC shown

The FTC sued defendants for injunctive relief and sought an order for production of cell phones and laptop computers. On the first issue of preservation of the Fourth Amendment claim in addition to the clearly asserted Fifth Amendment, the court … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: The FTC sought an order of production of cell phones and laptops for search in an action for injunction; production not testimonial and PC shown

LA4: When state fails to get a SW for def’s medical records, it doesn’t get a do over to fix it

In State v. Skinner, 10 So.3d 1212 (La. 2009), the state supreme court held that there was a state constitutional warrant requirement for defendant’s medical records. Failing to do it right can’t be cured by a later warrant after it’s … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Staleness, State constitution | Comments Off on LA4: When state fails to get a SW for def’s medical records, it doesn’t get a do over to fix it

Draft article: Orin S. Kerr, Compelled Decryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination

Orin S. Kerr, Compelled Decryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, forthcoming in the Texas Law Review, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3248286 Abstract:

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on Draft article: Orin S. Kerr, Compelled Decryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination

D.Ariz.: When a criminal defense lawyer’s office was the target of a SW, a special master was appropriate

Defendant is a criminal defense lawyer, and his office was subjected to a search and some client files were seized. When a criminal defense lawyer is the target of the search, there are clear Sixth Amendment concerns. While courts often … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: When a criminal defense lawyer’s office was the target of a SW, a special master was appropriate

IN: Order compelling owner of iPhone to unlock it violates 5A self-incrimination; the state is seeking to extract information from her mind

Defendant claimed she’d been sexually assaulted by her boyfriend. In investigating that, it turned into a stalking and harassment investigation of her. The state got a search warrant for her phone. When she wouldn’t unlock it, they sought a court … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on IN: Order compelling owner of iPhone to unlock it violates 5A self-incrimination; the state is seeking to extract information from her mind

LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail

LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail by Hannah Fry:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail

OR: Property tax reassessment claim dismissed for refusal to permit inspection

Taxpayer’s property tax assessment appeal is dismissed for refusing an inspection of the property claiming a Fourth Amendment violation. He claimed the records of the assessor are incorrect, and the assessor wants to see whether that’s true. He was told … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Privileges | Comments Off on OR: Property tax reassessment claim dismissed for refusal to permit inspection

LA Times: Editorial: Bugging conversations between criminal defendants and their lawyers is bad news

LA Times: Editorial: Bugging conversations between criminal defendants and their lawyers is bad news: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and under various court rulings that means government agents must first get warrants before listening in on … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: Editorial: Bugging conversations between criminal defendants and their lawyers is bad news

ID: Cell seizure of def’s notes for conversation with defense lawyer presumptively prejudicial; remanded to see if state can overcome prejudice and whether DA disqualified

Defendant was convicted of attempted murder. “While he was incarcerated prior to trial, Robins’s cell was searched and handwritten notes he had prepared in anticipation of a meeting with counsel were seized and delivered to the prosecuting attorney. The district … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on ID: Cell seizure of def’s notes for conversation with defense lawyer presumptively prejudicial; remanded to see if state can overcome prejudice and whether DA disqualified

LA Times: Authorities recorded privileged attorney-client conversations, district attorney’s office says

LA Times: Authorities recorded privileged attorney-client conversations, district attorney’s office says by Nina Agrawal:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: Authorities recorded privileged attorney-client conversations, district attorney’s office says

The Hill: Special master in Cohen case rejects more than a third of legal team’s privileged items

The Hill: Special master in Cohen case rejects more than a third of legal team’s privileged items by Aris Folley: According to court documents filed Thursday, Special master Barbara Jones found that 1,452 out of the 4,085 items designated privileged … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on The Hill: Special master in Cohen case rejects more than a third of legal team’s privileged items

MotherJones: A Private Prison Company Gave 1,300 Recordings of Confidential Inmate Phone Calls to Prosecutors

MotherJones: A Private Prison Company Gave 1,300 Recordings of Confidential Inmate Phone Calls to Prosecutors by Tonya Riley: Kansas’ US Attorney’s Office has admitted listening to opposing lawyers’ conversations. Securus, the company responsible for recording the calls, has already faced … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on MotherJones: A Private Prison Company Gave 1,300 Recordings of Confidential Inmate Phone Calls to Prosecutors

DE: Search of jail cell seizing legal materials violated 6A; dismissal of indictment required

The search of defendant’s prison cell seizing his legal materials without judicial approval violated his Sixth Amendment rights, not his Fourth Amendment rights. The lead prosecutor in his case reviewed the legal materials. The state should have used a taint … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on DE: Search of jail cell seizing legal materials violated 6A; dismissal of indictment required

MO: Recording def’s conversation with attorney in police station interview room violated 6A and privilege; mandamus granted against unsealing

Defendant’s attorney met him at the police station to confer, and they put them in an interview room which recorded their meeting. The trial court appointed a special master to review it. The recording violated defendant’s attorney-client privilege and right … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on MO: Recording def’s conversation with attorney in police station interview room violated 6A and privilege; mandamus granted against unsealing

MN: Seizure of blood sample by SW to a hospital doesn’t violate doctor-patient privielge

“The seizure of a patient’s blood sample pursuant to a search warrant addressed to a hospital does not violate the statutory physician-patient privilege because a blood sample collected by the hospital as part of medical treatment does not constitute ‘information’ … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on MN: Seizure of blood sample by SW to a hospital doesn’t violate doctor-patient privielge

The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications

The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications by Alan Dershowitz: The Fifth Amendment merely prohibits the use of illegally obtained self-incriminatory information at the defendant’s criminal trial. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unlawful intrusions into the privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications

ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?

No, the attorney-client privilege isn’t dead, and neither is the crime fraud exception. ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids? by Stephanie Francis Ward:

Posted in Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?