Category Archives: Good faith exception

SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

TX: Dissent added to Texas’s adopting Davis good faith exception to statutory exclusionary rule

Back in March was this post: Texas finally adopts the Davis good faith exception to its statutory exclusionary rule reporting on McClintock v. State, 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 291 (March 22, 2017). A dissent was just added in McClintock … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX: Dissent added to Texas’s adopting Davis good faith exception to statutory exclusionary rule

N.D.W.Va.: GFE generally doesn’t apply to warrantless searches

Defendant’s wife did not voluntarily consent to the police entry into the basement of her bar. First, they detained defendant behind the bar. Then police came to the bar in great numbers (6-15, depending on the witness) while the bar … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: GFE generally doesn’t apply to warrantless searches

E.D.Va.: While def’s Navy commander in CA couldn’t authorize military search on a base in VA, GFE applies

Defendant was in the Navy, and, due to a potential rape allegation against him, a pretext text message was sent to him by NCIS on behalf of the alleged victim. Defendant was stationed in San Diego, but he was in … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: While def’s Navy commander in CA couldn’t authorize military search on a base in VA, GFE applies

CA8: (1) In drug conspiracy case, the govt overcame staleness because of ongoing crime; (2) Issuance of SW in D.Neb. by non-cross designated USMJ in N.D.Iowa was subject to GFE

First, the search warrant in this drug conspiracy case wasn’t stale, although a long time had elasped during and between the times recorded in the affidavit of things that happened. While the evidence wasn’t strong, the deference accorded the issuing … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA8: (1) In drug conspiracy case, the govt overcame staleness because of ongoing crime; (2) Issuance of SW in D.Neb. by non-cross designated USMJ in N.D.Iowa was subject to GFE

D.Minn.: PC for SW doesn’t even need to be decided if the GFE would apply

Probable cause doesn’t even need to be decided if the good faith exception would apply. “Even assuming without deciding that the search warrants lacked probable cause, the Court concludes that the evidence is nonetheless admissible under the good-faith exception to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn.: PC for SW doesn’t even need to be decided if the GFE would apply

C.D.Cal.: Even if Carpenter reverses, Davis GFE will apply to searches occurring before

Even though CSLI is before SCOTUS in Carpenter, this court had sustained seizure of CSLI before, so, even if Carpenter reverses, the Davis good faith exception will sustain this seizure. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126504 (C.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Even if Carpenter reverses, Davis GFE will apply to searches occurring before

CA8 upholds Playpen warrant strictly on GFE despite Rule 41 violation

Playpen warrant upheld purely on good faith exception of Davis and Herring. Rule 41 was violated, but the court finds the costs of exclusion outweight deterrence, particularly where the rule was modified to permit such later warrants. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8 upholds Playpen warrant strictly on GFE despite Rule 41 violation

IL sustains arrest for firearm where statute authorizing arrest was later declared unconstitutional

Defendant was stopped under a statute later declared unconstitutional. Distinguishing prior authorities applying state law, the court holds that the “void ab initio” doctrine does not apply here, and the arrest, valid at the time, did not require suppression of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL sustains arrest for firearm where statute authorizing arrest was later declared unconstitutional

CA10 assumes Playpen warrant violated Rule 41 and upholds it solely on GFE

Assuming that Playpen search warrant for child pornography in this case issued in the Eastern District of Virginia was unlawful, the good faith exception would still apply to them. There was no reason the officers would not rely on them … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA10 assumes Playpen warrant violated Rule 41 and upholds it solely on GFE

FL declines to to apply Davis GFE where cell phone search issue was being actively litigated all over

Where everybody knew that the law wasn’t settled at the time of the search of defendant’s cell phone before Riley because the issue was being litigated everywhere and in this state, the state doesn’t get the benefit of the Davis … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on FL declines to to apply Davis GFE where cell phone search issue was being actively litigated all over

PA can’t decide (tie vote) whether GFE permits use of product of a search where the underlying probable cause proves completely false

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirms on an equally divided vote whether suppression is required under the state constitution where the officer relied in good faith on an affidavit that turned out to be completely wrong. The opinion supporting affirmance notes … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA can’t decide (tie vote) whether GFE permits use of product of a search where the underlying probable cause proves completely false

CA7: State court following Davis GFE for pre-Jones GPS hardly unreasonable application of federal law under § 2254(d)

District Court [inexplicably] granted CoA for appeal of Wisconsin planting a GPS device a year before Jones which the state court of appeals held was saved by Davis good faith exception. State v. Oberst, 2014 WI App 58, 354 Wis. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA7: State court following Davis GFE for pre-Jones GPS hardly unreasonable application of federal law under § 2254(d)

TN: TN SCt has to adopt Herring under exclusionary rule; Ct.Crim.App. can’t

Despite the Tennessee Supreme Court’s recent changes in exclusionary rule jurisprudence, the court has not yet adopted Herring on good faith reliance on an out of date list. This court will not do it–that court has to. State v. McElrath, … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN: TN SCt has to adopt Herring under exclusionary rule; Ct.Crim.App. can’t

TN: Blood draw without consent was valid at the time it happened; therefore valid

Obtaining defendant’s blood draw without consent was a practice authorized by binding appellate precedent at the time it occurred. Therefore, the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress was appropriate because the officer was acting under a good faith belief that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN: Blood draw without consent was valid at the time it happened; therefore valid

MO: Systemic negligence in officer’s preparation of SW affidavits showed GFE couldn’t be relied upon

On remand from State v. Robinson, 454 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. App. 2015), the only evidence in the record showed that the officer who prepared the affidavit was systemically negligent in the preparation of search warrant affidavits, and that precludes application … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on MO: Systemic negligence in officer’s preparation of SW affidavits showed GFE couldn’t be relied upon

S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure during SW wasn’t so bad this was a general search

In a forfeiture case of a building worth about $1B, the good faith exception applies to a prior search where there was an overseizure. This overseizure wasn’t enough to make the search a general search. In re 650 Fifth Ave. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, General warrant, Good faith exception, Overseizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure during SW wasn’t so bad this was a general search

N.D.Ohio: SW affidavit was so bare bones it never showed nexus or particularity; no GFE

The affidavit for search warrant here failed to show nexus between defendant’s house and drug dealing. There was some suspicion involving others and a stale anonymous tip never corroborated. Nothing implicated defendant except that one co-defendant was driving defendant’s van … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: SW affidavit was so bare bones it never showed nexus or particularity; no GFE

AR: Officer’s three week old knowledge of def’s suspended DL was RS for a stop

Reasonable suspicion doesn’t require certainty of facts. Here, the factual belief was that defendant’s DL had been suspended weeks earlier. Williams v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 291, 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 301 (May 10, 2017). There was enough probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Officer’s three week old knowledge of def’s suspended DL was RS for a stop

D.Minn. USMJ finds Playpen warrant constitutionally defective and no GFE

“Accordingly, the NIT warrant is void ab initio. Without an identifiable warrant exception (the Government offers none and the Court is aware of none) the Court concludes that the NIT warrant’s violation of Rule 41(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(a) … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn. USMJ finds Playpen warrant constitutionally defective and no GFE