Category Archives: Good faith exception

TN: 2012 cell phone search had to be evaluated by law at that time on PCR

Defendant’s post-conviction claim on the 2012 search of his cell phone fails because it wouldn’t have been granted back then. Blunkall v. State, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 11 (Jan. 4, 2019).* The CI’s information was significantly corroborated by observations … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: 2012 cell phone search had to be evaluated by law at that time on PCR

W.D.N.C.: Defendant has standing in rental car under Byrd but loses under GFE under binding circuit law

On remand from the Fourth Circuit, the court determines that Byrd applies and defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car he rented. As for the good faith exception, the court finds that it is bound by circuit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Defendant has standing in rental car under Byrd but loses under GFE under binding circuit law

E.D.Ky.: The affidavit for a search warrant does not need to allege a specific statute was violated

The affidavit for a search warrant does not need to allege a specific statute was violated as long as the issuing magistrate can conclude that a criminal offense likely occurred. The facts alleged determine the scope of search. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: The affidavit for a search warrant does not need to allege a specific statute was violated

IA: Def answered door in underwear with apparent semen stains; police there with SW for sex abuse with minors

Defendant was under investigation for sexual abuse of minors. “[T]he police went to Heggebo’s house to execute a search warrant. Heggebo answered the door wearing only shorts. The police seized Heggebo’s shorts because the shorts had apparent semen stains on … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IA: Def answered door in underwear with apparent semen stains; police there with SW for sex abuse with minors

CA6: GFE applies to evidence of nexus, too

While this court has struggled with what is sufficient nexus, the evidence of nexus here is more than minimal and clearly satisfies the good faith exception, too. United States v. Ardd, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 35389 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: GFE applies to evidence of nexus, too

TX7: Carpenter applied retroactively where def preserved issue

Defendant raised a Carpenter CSLI issue pretrial, and he prevails. Carpenter held retroactive (despite citing Davis). Dixon v. State, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 10340 (Tex. App. – Amarillo Dec. 13, 2018):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX7: Carpenter applied retroactively where def preserved issue

Cal.2: SWs must be executed reasonably, and facts determine who has the burden of proof

A search warrant must be executed reasonably, and it depends on which side has knowledge of what for the burden of proof. Here, the issue involves a blood draw at a hospital, and defendant has access to that information, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.2: SWs must be executed reasonably, and facts determine who has the burden of proof

CA9: PC was so lacking for two tracking warrants that GFE does not apply

Probable cause for two tracking warrants was so completely lacking that it was unreasonable to rely on them, and the good faith exception does not apply. United States v. Lopez-Zuniga, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 33096 (8th Cir. Nov. 26, 2018):

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA9: PC was so lacking for two tracking warrants that GFE does not apply

TX1: No REP in a contraband cell phone in a halfway house

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone possessed by a sex offender in a halfway house. The phone was subject to search like any other personal property, and defendant had a prohibition against possession of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX1: No REP in a contraband cell phone in a halfway house

W.D.N.Y.: PC was a close call, so the court finds GFE applies instead

Probable cause is a close call here. The USMJ found probable cause and that the good faith exception applied. On review of the R&R, the court applies only the good faith exception to find the search valid. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: PC was a close call, so the court finds GFE applies instead

FL4: Violating statute obtaining CSLI in 2001 suppressed, and no GFE

Police obtained defendant’s CSLI in 2001 by subpoena and without a court order contrary to statute. Defendant argued a search warrant was required. Then Carpenter was decided in 2018 requiring a warrant. The state violated the statute requiring a court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on FL4: Violating statute obtaining CSLI in 2001 suppressed, and no GFE

CA10: 17 hour seizure of def’s home while investigating wife’s OD was unreasonable; consent was product of the illegal seizure; exclusion required

Defendant’s wife had a seizure and stopped breathing at 5 am. He called 911. The police secured the home and denied him access. They obtained alleged consent after a few hours. They didn’t get a search warrant until 10 pm … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: 17 hour seizure of def’s home while investigating wife’s OD was unreasonable; consent was product of the illegal seizure; exclusion required

ID: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to be signed in judge’s presence

The search warrant was properly issued on affidavit. It didn’t have to be signed in the presence of the judge. An oral affidavit has to be, but this isn’t. State v. Hensley, 2018 Ida. App. LEXIS 49 (Nov. 16, 2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on ID: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to be signed in judge’s presence

D.Minn.: Second SW cured defects in first

First search warrant probably violated the Fourth Amendment, but another was sought that omitted everything about the first search warrant, including what was found. The second was valid, and the good faith exception applied. United States v. Eggerson, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Independent source | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Second SW cured defects in first

CA4: Info known by officer but not included in affidavit can be considered in applying GFE

Defendant’s phone was lawfully seized incident to his arrest and then geting a search warrant. “We agree with the district court that the evidence obtained from Thomas’s phone is admissible under Leon. Our precedents make clear that in assessing an … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Info known by officer but not included in affidavit can be considered in applying GFE

M.D.Fla.: Whether a state court judge could issue a ping order that crossed state lines is governed by GFE

A state court judge issued a ping order and the phone crossed state lines. Was it a tracking order or an SCA order? “The Court sees no need to venture further into the quagmire of tracking devices, the SCA, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Whether a state court judge could issue a ping order that crossed state lines is governed by GFE

CA6: Affidavit for SW failed both PC and nexus, but GFE applied: affidavit was detailed and 62 pages

The affidavit for the search warrant here failed to show both probable cause and nexus, and the court details why. However, the 62 page detailed affidavit detailing the whole investigation was not bare bones by any means, and the good … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit for SW failed both PC and nexus, but GFE applied: affidavit was detailed and 62 pages

OH5: To prove GFE doesn’t apply, the defense has to show bad faith [never mind that the burden is on the govt in GFE]

Officers could conduct a protective sweep when executing a search warrant. “In the case at hand, there was no testimony regarding bad faith on part of the officers who searched the residence where Appellant was hiding.” State v. Davis, 2018-Ohio-4368, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: To prove GFE doesn’t apply, the defense has to show bad faith [never mind that the burden is on the govt in GFE]

CA6&4: There clearly was PC for the SWs

“The affidavits supporting the searches of Sullivan’s apartment and vehicle overwhelmingly established probable cause to believe that Sullivan committed voyeurism, burglary, and possession of criminal tools.” “The search warrants for Sullivan’s vehicle, apartment, and computer were all sufficiently particular. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6&4: There clearly was PC for the SWs

CA9: Playpen warrant violated Rule 41(b)(1), but GFE still saved it

A Network Investigative Technique (NIT) warrant (“Playpen” warrant) issued by a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia exceeded the general territorial scope identified in Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(b)(1) and was thus void ab initio because it authorized … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA9: Playpen warrant violated Rule 41(b)(1), but GFE still saved it