Category Archives: Good faith exception

TN: Riley would not be applied retroactively on post-conviction

In a post-conviction case, Riley wouldn’t be applied retroactively by statute to defendant’s cell phone search incident legal before it was decided. Sayles v. State, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 193 (Mar. 28, 2019). The stop was based on a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN: Riley would not be applied retroactively on post-conviction

D.S.C.: Byrd on standing in a rental car not retroactively applied to search 7 months before

The officer was diligently pursuing the traffic stop albeit with a mixed motive about defendant being a drug suspect. Under Whren, this was reasonable. Byrd was decided seven months after the stop. Under pre-Byrd law, defendant had no standing, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Byrd on standing in a rental car not retroactively applied to search 7 months before

CT: 2010 CSLI in violation of state statute and later Carpenter suppressed

The state got prospective CSLI in 2010 which it ultimately admitted was obtained in violation of state statute. The statute, moreover, permitted the state’s discovery of CSLI on reasonable suspicion. Carpenter was violated, although it came in 2018, as well … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CT: 2010 CSLI in violation of state statute and later Carpenter suppressed

N.D.Ga.: Even if Carpenter applies to a cell phone tower dump, the GFE applies

Even if Carpenter applies to cell phone tower dumps, which isn’t a certainty, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Pendergrass, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222190 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 11, 2018), later opinion on reconsideration, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Even if Carpenter applies to a cell phone tower dump, the GFE applies

E.D.Mich.: Two affidavits of 51 and 72 pages showed they were not “bare bones” and GFE applied

“In this case, Special Agent Dosch, a 22-year veteran of the DEA, submitted a 51-page and 72-page detailed affidavit in support of the search warrants which were based on surveillance, information from confidential informants, financial records, evidence including drug contraband … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Two affidavits of 51 and 72 pages showed they were not “bare bones” and GFE applied

CA7: While the circumstantial evidence might support a SW or wiretap, it didn’t support guilt; reversed and dismissed

“We assume the government’s circumstantial evidence here might have supported a search warrant or perhaps a wiretap on Garcia’s telephone. It simply was not sufficient to support a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for distributing cocaine. We reverse … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA7: While the circumstantial evidence might support a SW or wiretap, it didn’t support guilt; reversed and dismissed

TX11 applies GFE to SW based on a statute later held unconstitutional

In an opinion on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Davis good faith applies to a search warrant issued under a provision of the Texas Penal Code later declared unconstitutional. Siller v. State, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 2227 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX11 applies GFE to SW based on a statute later held unconstitutional

Tennessee finally adopts the good faith exception under Herring

Tennessee finally adopts the good faith exception. State v. McElrath, 2019 Tenn. LEXIS 100 (Mar. 12, 2019) (concurring-dissenting 1; concurring-dissenting 2):

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on Tennessee finally adopts the good faith exception under Herring

CA1: Cell phones are not tracking devices, following CA7 & 3

“In affirming, we reject his arguments that there was error in the issuance of precise location information warrants (‘PLI warrants’) by a magistrate judge in Maine on a finding of probable cause, which allowed monitoring of the locations of Ackies’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA1: Cell phones are not tracking devices, following CA7 & 3

IN: Carpenter applies to a week of CSLI, but GFE and harmless error applies

In a case GVRd after Carpenter, Indiana finds Carpenter would be followed, but the good faith exception applied. Moreover, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Zanders v. State, 2019 Ind. LEXIS 46 (Mar. 8, 2019):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IN: Carpenter applies to a week of CSLI, but GFE and harmless error applies

NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

The search of defendant’s person at the jail after his arrest was valid as an inventory search. State v. Garcia, 302 Neb. 406 (Mar. 8, 2019). “As set forth above, the undersigned does not agree with Defendant that the affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NE: Search of the person here was valid an an inventory at the jail

D.Mont.: Federal telephonic SW not subject to suppression without bad faith

The stop, as told to defendant, was for a traffic violation, but there was reasonable suspicion for drug trafficking considering all that the officers knew. Therefore, using a drug dog was reasonable because a drug investigation was legally supported. Use … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Federal telephonic SW not subject to suppression without bad faith

CA9: CSLI warrant was issued without PC, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE should not apply

The government’s pre-Carpenter search warrant for CSLI was issued without probable cause, but it wasn’t so deficient that the good faith exception should not apply. United States v. Elmore, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 6507 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2019):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA9: CSLI warrant was issued without PC, but it wasn’t so lacking that GFE should not apply

N.D.Cal.: Despite 2011 violations of statute on real-time CSLI and trap and trace orders, GFE requires no suppression for isolated negligence

Seven years before Carpenter, Salinas CA police violated statute in getting real-time CSLI and a trap and trace order to find defendant after a robbery. The statutory violation was negligence, but it was isolated and not systemic, and the other … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Despite 2011 violations of statute on real-time CSLI and trap and trace orders, GFE requires no suppression for isolated negligence

AZ: Police relying on binding appellate precedent was subject to GFE

Police following state appellate precedent at the time of defendant’s blood test, later changed, was subject to the good faith exception. State v. Weakland, 2019 Ariz. LEXIS 56 (Feb. 25, 2019). Defendant filed what’s treated as a successor 2255 over … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AZ: Police relying on binding appellate precedent was subject to GFE

D.S.D.: SW affidavit merely referred to but not fully incorporated satisfied GFE on particularity

For the good faith exception to apply, it is only necessary that the affidavit be referred to in the warrant to save the warrant from a failure of particularity; it doesn’t need to be completely incorporated by reference. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.S.D.: SW affidavit merely referred to but not fully incorporated satisfied GFE on particularity

N.D.Cal.: GFE doesn’t apply to protective sweeps which must be objectively reasonable

The good faith exception cannot be applied to an overbroad protective sweep. [Yet, the court finds the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply for other reasons.] United States v. Garcia, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27861 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2019):

Posted in Good faith exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: GFE doesn’t apply to protective sweeps which must be objectively reasonable

N.D.Ga.: No nexus shown for Facebook SW, but GFE applied

The District Court disagrees with the USMJ that there was probable cause and nexus for a search warrant for defendant’s Facebook page. But, reasonable judges disagree, and that is enough for the court to conclude that the good faith exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No nexus shown for Facebook SW, but GFE applied

D.D.C.: Knotted plastic bag of drugs in waistband was in plain view

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and his tinted windows were way too dark and the officer couldn’t see inside. Defendant was told to lower the window, and he did. The officer could immediately see a knotted plastic bag … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Knotted plastic bag of drugs in waistband was in plain view

CA6: No successor 2255 for Carpenter

Petitioner seeks a 2255 successor habeas petition based on Carpenter. It’s denied because: It’s not newly discovered, and it wouldn’t even apply because of the good faith exception. In re Gipson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4457 (6th Cir. Feb. 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: No successor 2255 for Carpenter