N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

Officers arrived at the house the subject of an open 911 call during the emergency, and that authorized entry. United States v. Bray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63142 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25, 2026).*

The court can’t tell from the body cams whether the injury on plaintiff was intentional or accidental. That’s going to be a question for trial. Steinhoff v. Malovrh, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8627 (7th Cir. Mar. 24, 2026).*

Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim on habeas is barred by Stone. Wilfred H. v. Frame, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62003 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 27, 2026).*

Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim fails on the merits of consent. Cain v. Dir., Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Just.-Corr. Insts. Div., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62028 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 16, 2026).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.