CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Garza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026).

Petitioner’s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party records he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in. United States v. Rembert, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8558 (3d Cir. Mar. 24, 2026).*

Police waiting two days to get a search warrant after lawfully seizing defendant’s cell phone wasn’t unreasonable. State v. White, 2026 Mo. App. LEXIS 207 (Mar. 24, 2026).*

Petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and didn’t put anything on. [That’s on him.] Allen v. Brantley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61226 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Third Party Doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.