Daily Archives: April 3, 2020

VT AG: Attorney General’s Directive to Law Enforcement on the Enforcement of the COVID-19 Emergency Order

VT AG: Attorney General’s Directive to Law Enforcement on the Enforcement of the COVID-19 Emergency Order: The Executive Order 01-20 does not authorize road closure or the establishment of roadblocks, checkpoints or the authority to demand identification. You will continue … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on VT AG: Attorney General’s Directive to Law Enforcement on the Enforcement of the COVID-19 Emergency Order

Corporate Counsel: Microsoft Chief Legal Officer Applauds Washington’s Recently Signed Facial Recognition Law

Corporate Counsel: Microsoft Chief Legal Officer Applauds Washington’s Recently Signed Facial Recognition Law by Dan Clark (“Washington’s new law shows how regulation and market forces can move forward together in a way that advances innovation to meet public needs,” Brad … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Corporate Counsel: Microsoft Chief Legal Officer Applauds Washington’s Recently Signed Facial Recognition Law

The Intercept: Privacy Experts Say Responsible Coronavirus Surveillance is Possible

The Intercept: Privacy Experts Say Responsible Coronavirus Surveillance is Possible by Sam Biddle (“In less than a decade, whistleblowers like the NSA’s Edward Snowden and Cambridge Analytica’s Christopher Wylie helped spur a global sea change in the public’s attitude toward … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: Privacy Experts Say Responsible Coronavirus Surveillance is Possible

PA: Calling police to report burglary and theft of firearms was invitation to come to house and he let them in

Calling the police to report a burglary and theft of firearms was an invitation for them to come to the house, then he invited them in. This was implied consent to enter. Commonwealth v. Fredrick, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on PA: Calling police to report burglary and theft of firearms was invitation to come to house and he let them in

W.D.N.Y.: SW for telephone records not required instead of a subpoena

Defendant was entitled to a search warrant rather than a search warrant to obtain his telephone records. United States v. McClain, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55427 (W.D. N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020). The search warrant application for child pornography wasn’t at … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Staleness, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for telephone records not required instead of a subpoena

CA11: No REP in a police interview room where def was recorded confessing to his wife

There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interview room where defendant was recorded confessing to his wife. Lundberg v. Secretary, Fla. Dep’t of Correction, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9953 (11th Cir. Mar. 31, 2020). Police received a … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: No REP in a police interview room where def was recorded confessing to his wife

TX5: SW for blood didn’t have to say it could be tested, too; why else was it drawn?

A search warrant for a blood sample doesn’t have to say that it could be tested, too. Otherwise, why draw it at all. Common sense dictates it would be. Suppression order reversed. State v. Staton, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 2610 … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Pretext | Comments Off on TX5: SW for blood didn’t have to say it could be tested, too; why else was it drawn?

OH9: Medical records allegedly unlawfully seized weren’t in appellate record, so prejudice couldn’t be determined; held waived

Defendant claimed his medical records were unlawfully seized and admitted at evidence as an admission at this DUI trial. Without them in the appellate record, the appellate court can’t determine prejudice. Thus, this is waived. State v. Miller, 2020-Ohio-1209, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH9: Medical records allegedly unlawfully seized weren’t in appellate record, so prejudice couldn’t be determined; held waived

CA10: Def’s prior drug arrests by the officer contributed to RS when in a high crime area and other things

“Serna was ‘seized’ under the Fourth Amendment through a Terry stop when Sergeant Silva told Serna to keep his hands where he could see them, and Serna placed his hands on top of his head. … The district court ruled … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s prior drug arrests by the officer contributed to RS when in a high crime area and other things